Go Home

Due to a recent server outage, our video archives are currently unavailable. We are working as fast as we can to remedy this. Thanks for your understanding.

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (912)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (11881)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Bill Maher sat down with CNN's Fareed Zakaria to discuss President Obama's first term in office and how he's reacting to the mid-term elections, the hypocrisy of the teabaggers and Glenn Beck's move from pundit to preacher among other things.

ZAKARIA: "Politically Incorrect" was the name of the show Bill Maher hosted in the 1990s. It's also an apt description of the man himself. Now host of eighth HBO's hit show "Real Time", I find Maher to be one of the sharpest observers of American politics and life in general out there. It doesn't mean I always agree with him. I always find him funny, though.

Several times over the past few years, he has asked me questions. This time it's my turn. Welcome to the show, Bill Maher.

MAHER: Nice to be here.

ZAKARIA: So Obama. How do you think he's responded to the shellacking so far?

MAHER: He looks beaten down. That's what disturbs me. You know, I thought when we elected the first black president, as a comedian, I thought two years in I'd be making jokes about what a gangster he was, you know. And not that he's President Wayne Brady. I thought we're getting Suge Knight.

And, you know, for him to be talking about compromising with the Republicans on the Bush tax cuts, where -- where are they going to draw a line in the sand? When are they going to remember who they are? I'm so disappointed and I still like him and still think there's hope. He could get it yet, but I'm so disappointed that he just seems to be another in a long line of Democrats that come across as wimpy and woozy and whatever word you want to as describe to it of not standing up for what they believe in enough.

The Republicans seem to continually stake out a position further, further to the right and then demand that the Democrats meet them in the middle except that that's not the middle anymore.

ZAKARIA: Yes.

MAHER: That's the near right.

ZAKARIA: But, you know, you say Democrats keep doing this. Is there a possibility that the reason they do this is the electorate is further right than you would like it to be.

MAHER: No, I -- I reject that entirely. It's because the Republicans are much better at sticking by what they believe in and they all get on the same page. I mean, a good example, and I think where this administration really went off kilter, was the public option with the health care debate. That was his big issue that's what he staked his administration on. That debate should have started from we're the Democrats, we're the party of the people. We want a single payer plan. Of course that would never pass, but that should have been their position.

The Republicans would be, no, our -- our health care plan is called drop dead or they maybe would have improved it, go screw yourself plus perhaps, meet in the middle at the public option. It is after all an option. To see these people dressed up as the founding fathers who want more freedom, but you don't want an option? It's actually more freedom for you, you see there. That should have been where they stuck it.

And the public option was polling at around 70 percent popularity when the debate started. But see that's what the Republicans do. They take something that's polling at 40 percent and they say, OK, we'll all get on the same page, we'll hammer it home, we'll get it up to 55. The Democrats, they abandon what they -- they didn't run on health care in this last election. This was a big thing that presidents going back to Teddy Roosevelt have tried to get the American people. They got it done and they ran away from it.

Now, the American people don't follow issues that closely. What they follow is who's dominating, who's -- who's standing by what they believe in. What they see is Democrats not standing behind what they passed in health care and so to them, they say to themselves there must be something wrong with it if these people aren't standing up for it.

ZAKARIA: But the big shift if you look 1996 when the Democrats sweep into power, 57 percent of independents voted Democrat. In this election, 57 percent of independents voted Republican. What does that tell you?

MAHER: That tells me independents don't pay that much attention. Independents are people who just throw out the party that's in power because Obama got elected and it didn't immediately start rating 20s. So throw the bums out. By the way, the same bums that they just, you know, threw out two years ago they wanted to put back in. No wonder we can't get anything done in this country.

So, you know, this idea that the independents are these -- these careful thinkers who assess what's going -- I don't think that's who the independent voter is. I just they're -- they're cranky people who want change. They voted for change in '06. They voted for change in '08. They voted -- I don't blame them for being impatient with Obama. He did promise us change and he's delivered some of it. I mean there has been change.

In other ways, he looks too much like what we had before. I could name a whole list of issues where the Democrats and the Republicans really are the same party. When people say, you know, there's not enough bipartisanship, I very often think, no, there's actually too much. On Afghanistan, too much. We have two parties, we have one policy. Gun control, two parties, one policy. Marijuana, two parties, one policy. Lot -- there's a lot of that in this country.

ZAKARIA: But it'd be fair to say that, I mean, your -- your views represent -- wouldn't you say when you want to legalize marijuana, you want -- you're -- you are to the left of the American public.

MAHER: I don't -- again, I don't know about that. I mean, the last poll I saw, 44 percent of the American public wanted to legalize marijuana. Now, that's without anybody in one of the major parties backing that. We had Prop 19 out in California which was on the ballot and it was polling above 50 percent, but no Democrat in the state would get behind that.

I mean, it's really not that controversial an issue to -- to legalize marijuana if you look at the facts. And yet, if it was polling at 44 percent with no Democrat, nobody in either major party getting behind it, don't you think it could be over 50 percent if somebody said, yes, this is the right thing to do? So I think the American public is a lot more left leaning than people think.

ZAKARIA: You know that one of the charges against Obama is he's trying to make America look more like Europe.

MAHER: I hope so.

ZAKARIA: But I think you would say -- you would say good.

MAHER: Of course. Yes. Europe does a lot of -- I mean, we don't want to look like the Greek economy or the Irish economy at this point, but let's be honest. One reason that those two economies are in such bad shape is the banks in America. Not that they didn't, you know, get into it themselves.

But in many ways, I think we would be a much better country if we acted a little more like Europe. We would have, you know, gay marriage, we would be able to, yes, have marijuana. We arrest something like 750,000 people for marijuana. They don't do that in Europe. Healthcare for people, you know, this idea -

ZAKARIA: But the argument is that they're sclerotic, they -- they don't grow as much, we have a dynamic economy.

MAHER: Do we? We have a dynamic economy.

ZAKARIA: Not -- not maybe right this moment.

MAHER: Yes.

ZAKARIA: But the argument -- Silicon Valley, you know, there's entrepreneurship.

MAHER: Yes.

ZAKARIA: There's so much more dynamic place.

MAHER: Oh, there are great things about this country. You know, why can't we take the good from here and not the bad? Let's not take the sclerotic part. Let's take the, you know, the part of -

ZAKARIA: Let's take the (INAUDIBLE).

MAHER: But, you know, there is one major -- oh, yes -- there is one major party in this country, the Republicans, who will never listen to an idea that comes from another party. You know, their idea of American exceptionalism, that's all they care about.

If you -- if you look at Sarah Palin, what she says, all of them, Mitt Romney's book is called "No Apologies." Not that anybody asked for one. The case for American greatness I think is what it's called. And, you know, they live in this fantasy world where it's always 1945. America's always number one.

Marc Rubio, who's the new teabag senator from Florida, the new -- the new Bobby Jindal, I think, he made a speech, it was astounding. And this is not uncommon for a Republican to talk about this at the CPAC Convention. He said this is the only country in the world where an idea that started out as an idea on a cocktail napkin could wind up being traded on the stock exchange. No, other countries have napkins and stock exchanges. But you see, this is their room full of balls at Chuck E. Cheese. Their fantasy world they live in.

ZAKARIA: And if they actually look at the data and say, well, America is actually 20th on Internet in social world (ph) --

MAHER: In so many -- I mean, we're like 65th in infant mortality, 19th in literacy. You know, one of the big arguments during the health care debate that the Republicans put forward, one of their major talking points was why are we messing around with the greatest health care system in the world? I don't know. Maybe because the U.N. ranks it 37? You know, these people, they love the truth, they just hate facts.

ZAKARIA: When we come back, we will talk more about facts and we will talk about Republicans when we come back with Bill Maher.

[...]

ZAKARIA: And we are back with Bill Maher talking about American politics and lots more.

The Republicans, the Tea Party, is there anything about it, any pleasant surprises?

MAHER: For comedians, many pleasant -- they're one a week. I guess , you know, if you want to look at the silver lining, is that in the election we just had, they did not -- the American public did not elect any of the people we thought were the most extreme. Carl Paladino didn't win, Sharron Angle didn't win. Christine O'Donnell didn't win.

America I would never say is burden by being an intellectual country, but they did draw a line in the sand somewhere. They said, you know, some stupidity is just a bridge too far even for us. So that -- that's the good news. The bad news, of course, is that the teabaggers are ascendant. We see that they are already making rank and file Republicans change the way they view things like on earmarks and so forth. I think they're always going to have to answer to the Tea Party because they -- they worry about a Tea Party rebellion against them.

But, you know, what I think makes the teabaggers such a non- credible organization is that they pretend to be all about the deficit and taxes, you know. They're named after a tax revolt after all. And, first of all, almost none of them understand that their taxes have gone down under Obama. So they're named after a tax revolt, but they don't know anything about taxes. That's one thing.

The other thing is, if they're so concerned about the deficit, where were they when the deficit was going up mostly under Bush? I mean, again, these are those inconvenient things called facts. But most of the deficit was the Bush tax cuts for the rich which were urgently not needed and, of course -

ZAKARIA: Prescription drugs for the elderly.

MAHER: -- prescription drugs for the elderly, the two words that we put on the credit card. That's where the money went. Dick Cheney said during the Bush terms deficits don't matter and they seemed to go along. But suddenly when President Nosferatu takes office, deficits matter very much.

ZAKARIA: How much do you think the Tea Party is about, you know, taxes and libertarianism and how much is it about religion? I ask this because, a, I know how much you love the -- the issue of religion.

MAHER: I do.

ZAKARIA: But when you watched Glenn Beck's rally, what's fascinating is it was mostly about religion.

MAHER: I think he's doing what some people before him have done like L. Ron Hubbard, who's a novelist and decided, you know what, it's a much easier gig to be a religious leader.

ZAKARIA: And tax exempt.

MAHER: And tax -- tax exempt. And you already have people -- I mean, there's a reason they call them the flock, because they're sheep and they'll believe anything. So I think Glenn Beck is seguing (ph) from what he was mostly a political preacher, to a preacher preacher. It is an easier gig and you make more money, you know, Jim Baker kind of money. And so, yes, I think that could be something.

But, you know, the Tea Party -- I'm not the first one to notice this, is really an amalgam of a whole bunch of different types of people and it's some old school John Bircher types, it is some racists, it is actually people who care about the deficit and the debt as I do, as you do, we all do. And I think there is an element -- there was an article in the "New York Times" about a month ago that said an article of faith of all the teabaggers is to believe that global warming is a hoax. And you mentioned religion. I saw one of the guys quoted in the article, a teabagger guy said I've read my Bible. God put the earth here for us to utilize it.

And, you know, we can laugh that off exempt that the guy who's going to be taking over the energy commission, Shimkus, you know this guy. He's Republican John Shimkus. He's a real winner. He says that we don't have to worry about global warming, because in the Bible, God promised Noah after the flood, you know, Noah, the 500-year-old man who got two of every animal on the ship and got them to -- OK. He promised Noah after the flood, he wouldn't wipe out the world again, so why are we worrying about global warming.

I mean, what -- you're a man of the world. What does the rest of the world think of this country? It is embarrassing that we have these yokels who are in charge. They must be laughing at us in almost every world capital when they hear something like that.

ZAKARIA: Bill Maher, always a pleasure.

MAHER: Good to see you.

ZAKARIA: We will be right back.

Share This Post

Link To This Post


36 Comments
Daddio478's picture

the world laughing at us, time to pull this out of hiding again.


"No man is so foolish but he may sometimes give another good counsel, and no man so wise that he may not easily err if he takes no other counsel than his own. He that is taught only by himself has a fool for a master." - Hunter S. Thompson

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

Diabolus est Deus Inversus

fastfeat's picture

"Parachutes are allowed in checked or carry-on baggage, but may not be worn in flight."

---Southwest Airlines

fastfeat's picture

Now I can go back to bed.


"Parachutes are allowed in checked or carry-on baggage, but may not be worn in flight."

---Southwest Airlines

...the dummies for ratings(with imaginary equivalencies like Stewart and Cooper).

Taarak's picture

I can appreciate what Stewart was trying to say after his rally.

What does analysis sound like in America, IF you remove the politically oriented he said/she said from the discussion? The politics cannot be removed from Fox – that’s a given. But it’s not necessary to resort to their level of ‘left vs right’ in every effort to refute them. That’s their game and their rules and playing that way validates the game.

Stewart went on Maddow to try to explain this, but I don't think he succeeded.

ixnay's picture

... is another man's proof of faulty logic.


CTHULHU 2012 "Why vote for a lesser evil?"

CaliforniaMike's picture

There are so many things we don't know or understand, and the problem is that we don't know that we're ignorant. That's the worst way to be, and when Republicans say, "No, no, you're not ignorant, you're smart," they're eating right out of their hands.


CaliforniaMike blogs at All Voices and at his own blogs, http://www.mikerappaport.net/onevoice and at http://oneminutewithmike.blogspot.com.

osage's picture

The Obama White House has done more to enable and validate corporate funded Republicans, bankers, wall street, the military industrial complex, big energy, big insurance, big pharmaceutical, big medical and big media than he has to help liberal and progressive Democrats hold them accountable and expose their dishonesty, corruption, irresponsibility and their usurious monopolistic abuses of American citizens and American values.

reluctant leader's picture

It's time Maher and the MSM wake up and smell the coffee. Only a handfull of Democrats believe in Democratic Party principles and a progressive agenda. Even Obama, who ran on that very platform, is more a conservative than a liberal. Democratic Party leaders are more conservative than liberal. Committee chairpersons are more conservative than liberal. If they want to be competitive, they have to kiss the financial elite's asses, which means they'll give tax cuts to the rich, keep the wars going, cut social services, and let our corrupt financial sector continue to have carte blanche with our wealth.

It's painfully honest this government ignores the will of the majority of the people. They only listen to people who have money and power. Maybe it's always been this way in America, but I've never seen it so bad as it is now.

cund_gulag's picture

Wellstone and Kennedy are dead. Feingold and Graystone didn't get re-elected.
That leaves Al Franken.
Al Franken for President!
Yes, I'm serious.
If we can have a 3rd rate actor like Reagan, and the Republicans Party a joke, why can't we have a 1st rate comic as President?
Yeah, believe me, I do know...

Tucsonlib's picture

But don't forget Bernie Sanders! And there are still several progressives in the House: Kucinich, Grijalva, etc...

Geronimo.'s picture

I feel the same way about Bill Maher. When Geraldo and Fox News' Judge Napolitano can take on a topic but Bill Maher can't, it says more about Bill Maher than it does Fox News. He is Weak in my opinion.

But I agree with a lot of his other sentiments.


"Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people." ~ Eleanor Roosevelt

nwbrelic's picture

I lost any respect for his opinion when he threw those people out of the audience.

Scottie's picture

That moment wasn't about his opinion.

His show is not a town hall meeting. It's his show. He has a time slot to work to. I don't want to sit and watch a panelist TV show with hoons yelling out from the bleachers and trying to take over the dialogue. Regardless of whether or not their point had any substance to it, there is a time and a place to have a cross-conversation. A panel-formed TV show isn't it when you have to give time to the guests that you have on.

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

He had sex with ann colter...

At least he has intestinal fortitude.


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

Gary's picture

Maher must be good at reach arounds.

ikalbertus's picture

The laws of physics are against that

Dradeeus's picture

If we hear a story about people hunting witches in Uganda... we chuckle or are saddened at the absurdity.
Witches? You are so behind the times.

We hear about women forced to wear headgarbs because of a religion, and think, my god. It's the year 2010.

...And our leaders think that Global Warming is a hoax because god ALREADY drowned the world once, and promises never to do it again.

Why is that not JUST AS laughable as the others.

Its Me's picture

He could get it yet, but I'm so disappointed that he just seems to be another in a long line of Democrats that come across as wimpy and woozy and whatever word you want to as describe to it of not standing up for what they believe in enough.

An unfair criticism unless Maher had a brilliant idea for how to convince 2 Senate Republicans and one Independent to ignore their personal and political agenda and provide the 58th, 59th and 60th vote required to pass anything of value over the past 2 years.

The Republican Party has mastered the art of choosing their moment to obstruct. Minority obstruction has little impact after a Republican president or Congress takes the majority over from a Democratic one, typically into an environment of a stable or growing economy, thanks to the efforts of those outgoing Democrats.

But when Democrats take over from Republicans, typically into a hellish world of one crashing disaster after another thanks to the efforts of the outgoing Republicans, all it takes is one or two stubborn participants to dig in their heels and resist all efforts at recovery for them to control the agenda. Republicans know how that works and have played their game accordingly for decades.

Dradeeus's picture

I've said it before. You can simultaneously criticize Obama's weakness, while still acknowledging the obstructionist nature of the Republicans. It's not one or the other.

Canceling the taxes for the rich was polling at around 66% (yes) to 20% (no). And yet Democrats were saying in papers, before the vote... "We're going to take a vote, and when that fails, we'll vote for all tax cuts."

...That's INSANELY weak. Jesus, man, if ever there was a time to say "WE WILL NOT BUDGE", it is when two and a half times more of the country agrees with you.

We don't live in conventional, informed times. The average American doesn't give a shit who voted what. They see what passed, and what didn't.

If the Republicans vote down taxes, tell the Americans that their Christmas paychecks will be smaller because of Republicans. That's FIGHTING. That's drilling it into the minds of the American people that the Republicans would tear down a small village if it blocked the view of a rich guy's manor.

They will of course be paying for them in reduced entitlement programs because an "adult" conversation will be required about out of control spending. The wealthiest will keep all of their tax cut windfall and everyone else will be paying the tab. For Obama and the dems to vote for this Trojan horse tax is their concession of even a greater future transfer of wealth as austerity programs, which will have to be coming, never ever target the wealthy.

Its Me's picture

"WE WILL NOT BUDGE" would have been a joke by January of next year. For one thing, by then, the "WE" would no longer have meant a Democratic House majority. And a new, far more "Republican" tax proposal originating with Boehner and his "tea partiers" would be put on the table.

I heard Chris Matthews say Obama should have had Congress put the extensions of the unemployment benefits up for a separate vote on Christmas Eve, as though the aura of Dickens' "A Christmas Carol" would have forced Republicans to vote for them.

He's wrong. They would not have voted for them in a separate vote then or any time. Meanwhile the country would have lost a huge contribution to stimulus for continued economic recovery.

Voting against economic recovery, expansion and the ultimate generation of wealth for most Americans is what Republicans do for a living. It is how they get elected and re-elected by their base.

But it is not what Democrats do.

He's favorite position is to pass negotiations off to the senate and the house and see what they accomplish while he secretly negotiates (read, give away) with republicans or industry leaders behind closed doors. The most practical way to look at this is he's not what he portrayed himself to be prior to election - and he is governing exactly the way he envisoned. He's not a liberal, not a progressive, and is barely, if at all, a democrat.

ixnay's picture

... he is just not leading where you wanna go.


CTHULHU 2012 "Why vote for a lesser evil?"

Rich H's picture

but certainly, if he has leadership skills, he hasn't shown any.

ronhohn's picture

... for trip to Utopia, but he is leading us to hell.


If you need funds to pay for essentials, you have a revenue problem
If you need funds to pay for frivolity, you have a spending problem

Cell's picture

So basically your saying that the repubs have been playing this game for decades, but that the dems have failed to effectively counter it, yet we are supposed to still back the dems for some reason. That's a long history of failure your backing.

I think you need to come to grips with the fact that the electoral system is corrupt and broken. Until there are demonstrations, riots and general strikes, the corporatists will continue to kick our asses.

The Glenn Beck Review's picture

I think that riots will play right into Beck's hand. Demonstrations? Yes. General strikes? Yes. Boycotts? Yes. Riots will only turn people we need on our side off.

The corporatists have the upper hand, I fully agree with you. Taking the country back will be a challenge as great as the Civil War. The question is how best to proceed. Beck is betting on and predicting riots, like what they had in Greece.

We need to educate the voters, even if that means door to door campaigning with literature. We have this great Internet tool, but so does the right.


"The antidote to bad speech is more speech." ~~J.S. Mill

Cell's picture

Your right of course. It was more a figure of speech than calling for actual property destruction. But they will call it a riot when the cops start beating the hell out of the demonstators for not dispersing.

If the demonstrations are not disruptive enough to bring on confrontation, then there will be crickets from the msm like they never happened at all. There will be no fawning coverage like the teabaggers recieved.

And your also right that they will use it as an excuse for a crack down. I never said it would be easy, but I don't believe the electoral system will work anymore unless heavy pressure from political unrest is brought on. The trick is to figure out how to parlay the crack downs into political solidarity so we are no longer divided and conquered. Then maybe general strikes and mass banking withdrawals can have an effect. The pocket book is the only place the corporatists feel any pain.

GeorgetheMaleAmazon's picture

Cell, I am in agreement with you on general strikes as a possible show of dissatisfaction, and that would be a way to obtain attention for the cause. Yet there are so many on the right who would call us troublemakers and then use truncheons - not to mention tear gas - to try to break us up.

This is where we must stand in solidarity and form a new progressive organization - for the good of the whole country.

As for mass banking withdrawals, I have already learned to keep my money in a community bank or a credit union, where they don't play credit default swaps or other items such as that. Yet there are so many on the right who would liken that onto socialism.

Wee need someone from our side who can kick some right wing keester, especially at the polls.

The Glenn Beck Review's picture

Maher is correct that people on the right are largely yokels. It's not just embarrassing, it's dangerous.

How long do we have before the permafrost thaws and creates a positive feedback that accelerates global warming and climate change?

One irony is that News Corp is a relatively green company, but Murdoch allows his overpaid, under-informed minions to spew nonsense about climate change that favors the petroleum companies.

I don't think that Beck is "turning into a frickin' televangelist" (his words) for the money or the ease of being a pseudo-preacher. I suspect that Scott Rasmussen was hired by Beck to determine some facts about Beck's flock. Beck then regeared his act (and it is an act) to match his audience. Beck is many things and among that list is "opportunist."

Not on that list is historian:
http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/201...


"The antidote to bad speech is more speech." ~~J.S. Mill

ikalbertus's picture

I think Beck's schtick although not overtly religious is targeted mainly at Christian fundamentalists. He uses very similar rhetoric to evangelical preachers who talk politics (and who should lose tax-exempt status for that). Examples are his rantings on social justice or progressives. So it's really not much of a stretch when Beck drifted toward the religious emphasis with his rally. I'm willing to bet that the vast majority of his dedicated listeners believe in the devil, to the point of obsession for many. Beck will do whatever he thinks will enrich him more.

Maher's observation that one thing the TP'ers all have in common is the belief that global warming is a hoax is spot on.

ikalbertus's picture

Prescription drugs for the elderly.

MAHER: -- prescription drugs for the elderly, the two words that we put on the credit card.

That's two wars on the credit card.

...believes in. The problem is WHAT does he actually believe in. Anything? Anything at all?

Comments are closed on this entry