Phil Donahue on Media Consolidation and Being Taken Off the Air for Opposing Iraq Invasion
Phil Donahue joined Eliot Spitzer and Kathleen Parker to discuss his long career as a talk show host, the dangers of media consolidation and his ouster from MSNBC during the run up to the invasion of Iraq for daring to speak out opposing it. You generally don't find too many conversations like this one on cable news since I'm sure their bosses wouldn't want to shine a light too brightly on the need to bust these companies up. Every once in a while one slips through like this one though.
PARKER: If you think Oprah has the longest running syndicated talk show in history, think again. That particular honor belongs to our next guest.
SPITZER: Phil Donahue invented the daytime confessional format, aiming both high brow and low in his 29-year long career. We spoke to him earlier.
SPITZER: Thank you for joining us. It's an honor to have you here.
PARKER: I'm thrilled. I watched your show for years and years. I think my entire life.
DONAHUE: Well, I thank you. You turned out anyway, didn't you, watching me?
PARKER: Do you sometimes think maybe you created a monster?
DONAHUE: Well, I have said they are all my illegitimate children and I love them equally. But it is true that the game has changed, really quite something. In many ways it's changed from when I went often the off the air which was '96 with my daytime show.
And even the cable, nighttime, your arena, since 2002, when I was on MSNBC, it's totally different now, totally.
PARKER: Is it meaner? Is it coarser?
DONAHUE: Sure. First of all, I would never mention Bill O'Reilly on my MSNBC program in 2002. This is only eight years ago. Why would you mention the competition? People might -- today, this group --
SPITZER: They live off each other.
DONAHUE: The shows have fallen back on each other and we are now being entertained by watching them fight with each other.
PARKER: But guess what, you don't see women doing that, do you?
DONAHUE: I haven't thought about that.
SPITZER: Oh, sure you do.
PARKER: Not really?
SPITZER: I'm not going to name names. I don't think there is a gender divide here. Some of the more vitriolic names right now may not be women, but I don't think there's a gender division.
PARKER: I think some woman are vitriolic in their approach to interviewing and commenting. But I don't think they go after each other.
DONAHUE: You might want to watch "The View."
PARKER: Yeah.
DONAHUE: Well that's true, that is not a night time show. I don't know if that makes a difference, but certainly they push back.
SPITZER: I want to go back to Newt Minnow who way back in the 60s, I think it was, referred to TV as a vast wasteland. Are we doing better? Are the talk shows even though they're edgy and they're loud and the decibel level may be too high, do they contribute to our politics in a way or a bad way, do you think?
DONAHUE: Well, as you know, I'm a brilliant man.
SPITZER: We do know, that's why I'm asking you this hard question.
DONAHUE: Here's the thing I'm having trouble with. You know, I -- in -- my first job was in a radio station, and I was the news director. I had never been a reporter. I was the news director, by the way, because I was the only man in the news department. It was a small radio station.
And I covered the news, and I could stop the mayor. I was like -- I looked 12 years old, and I couldn't get over the power of this thing. And then I'm a slow learner. The First Amendment ensures that if anybody can be a reporter, even me, I took no test, I didn't pee in a bottle, I just said I'm a reporter, and I was, that's what you want, because you get a lot of people reporting then. And then somewhere in the middle of this large crowd will be found the truth.
Today, that middle is occupied by five companies. So you don't get to push back. There is -- I have 900 channels on my TV, but 700 of them are selling the Botox machine. That is not good diversity.
SPITZER: But right. But here's where the new media, the technology maybe our saving grace. There has been this diffusion, this explosion in terms of the number of channels and the YouTubes and social media so everybody is a journalist, because everybody can talk to everybody.
And you're right. There is this enormous and dangerous concentration, but out of that voices will emerge, can we not hope, sort of --
DONAHUE: You would hope. But let's remember this, governor -- every major metropolitan newspaper in this country supported the invasion of Iraq.
SPITZER: Right.
DONAHUE: I mean, think about that. This is the land of the first amendment. Cacophony of voices, arguing, growing --
SPITZER: Let me raise something then that --
DONAHUE: But this is corporate media. This is what you get.
SPITZER: I want to raise something then that we weren't going to raise, which is that you were pushed off the air because you opposed it.
DONAHUE: I opposed the war.
SPITZER: And is that one of the reasons they pushed you off?
DONAHUE: Read the memo published by the "New York Times," "Donahue's anti-war voice is not going to work against the flag waving on the other station." Donahue and any anti-war voice in 2002, remember, they're all doing what I did now. The whole channel is now. You could not criticize this war four months before the invasion. It was not good for business.
You had -- General electric had no interest in featuring an old talk show host who was against the president's war. It was -- it was unpopular. You weren't American. This is what you get with corporate media. It's going to happen again.
PARKER: Well, and, you know, when the Congress voted for it, too. But everyone did think there was something going on. It's not like they were just maliciously going after another country. People were afraid, don't you think? After 9/11 --
DONAHUE: Are we so insecure?
PARKER: Yes.
DONAHUE: That when --
PARKER: After we were attacked the way we were attacked, I think there was a low, low tolerance for any kind of risk. I'm not making a justification for war. I'm just saying what --
DONAHUE: Are you making a justification for this war?
PARKER: The mindset of the country at the time was such that -- I mean, I wish you had been on the air doing your old show.
DONAHUE: I do, too. But I didn't make it to the invasion. I was gone three months -- the invasion was March of '03 and I was gone like in January. And the president -- the president scared the hell out of the nation.
PARKER: The nation was already scared.
DONAHUE: He's under your bed, he's outside your window, he's got mass destruction weapons. You could feel the heartbeat of the nation accelerate. It was a bloodlust --
SPITZER: You are so right in what you're saying is so important about the lack of tolerance for dissenting voices and your voice not going to be silenced.
DONAHUE: Oh, thank you.
SPITZER: It won't be. I don't care who does what. It won't be silenced.
PARKER: Phil Donahue, thank you for being with us.
DONAHUE: Thank you both.
PARKER: We'll be back.





I'd never heard of Ms. Parker but after that I'm wish I never had. She is Palin-level stupid.
Woman anchors never say bad things about other anchors?
Everyone was scared of Saddam?
Seriously, pairing Spitzer with that moron is like if Lenny & George from Of Mice and Men had a news show.
Hopefully humanity will one day learn to be humane.
Love that line. I wish and pray it could come true. I have a feeling with this republican party they have lost their way of being humane. Hopefully people can open their eyes and see they have been played by Fox news. I know I don't like being told what to think, see, or watch on the news.
Southern Yankee
I like that "Of Mice and Men" reference! LOL!
People were scared. Obviously too scared and IGNORANT to see through the very transparent lies of Bush, Rice, Cheney and Powell, the snake oil hucksters. It takes more than a pretty face, Ms. Parker--it takes a brain. You are grossly unqualified to sit next to Eliot.
That day of terror merely primed the pump for the DC sniper, and especially the anthrax letters. IMHO, it was the anthrax "threat" (which was primarily directed at the Liberal East Coast Establishment) which pushed people over the edge, and paved the way for GW Bush's 3 pronged attack on the USA Constitution (Patriot Act, Afghanistan, and Iraq).
All that bullshit about nuclear mushroom clouds over Chicago (or was that Cleveland?) and Saddam's Nuclear| Biological| Chemical WMD would have been far less believable without those anthrax letters (which has never been solved). Of course, the USA knew all about Saddam's WMD programs -- George HW Bush held the USA receipts for those programs directed against Iran. (I suspect those receipts are now located in Tricky-Dick's man-sized safe.)
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
-- John F. Kennedy
After 9/11 the BushCo. administration terrorized its own citizens with a relentless campaign of fear. That simple.
Their aim was to reduce you to a blithering and fearful mob of idiots ready to go along with anything to "keep America safe". No reasoning required: America wanted revenge. Any revenge would do. Just make someone pay.
far left loon >.<
"It is necessary to issue caution, for the popular mind has grown so confused that it is no longer able to receive any statement of fact except as an expression of personal feeling."
Dorothy L. Sayers (The Mind of the Maker, 1941)
Hopefully humanity will one day learn to be humane.
Not every american was dumb enough or cowardly enough to fall into the trap laid by Bush. I can't even type his name without asking, why isn't he in jail yet?
Obama's regime struck a deal with the GW Bush regime, to not prosecute war crimes, even before his inauguration on January 20th, 2009.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
-- John F. Kennedy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tR5YVVqwv7U
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
I'd never heard of Ms. Parker but after that I'm wish I never had. She is Palin-level stupid.
Absolute dipstick. Who is this broad?
far left loon >.<
The media already speaks with only one voice. Consolidation will just make things worse. As it is now Fox dictates the entire course of discussion; the other networks simply follow with coverage and debate of the issues/agenda that Fox broadcasts.
Parker is what's wrong with the media. After all we know now she is still making excuses for our horrific and unjustified invasion. She should just leave the show. Spitzer is more than capable of making that show a hit all on his own.
... and then that's where the interview ends.
I think they silenced him all the same.
we all weren't afraid. That's BS. Those that were afraid were brainwashed by the media.
The thing that amazes me is that the media reports that support for Bush went to something like 99% (or some ridiculous figure) immediately after the 9-11 attacks. I watched them live on TV, and I immediately suspected an inside job because of the way the towers went down. Either way, I hated Bush as much one day before the attacks as one day after. So I am surprised to hear that he had such support. People really are stupid in this country. Like Parker.
just reported as 99%.
She is part of the brainwashed Villager media, who spout the same pre-chewed, tested, tried, and true BS whenever they open their mouths. And too often, they're the only ones allowed to open them.
I watched Phil at the time because HE WAS THE ONLY ONE who had guts not to to get in lockstep. And, it scared me when I saw him, with the highest rated show on MSNBC, be taken off the air.
I'm glad he said what he just said. I'ts true. There are only a handful of companies that control all access to information in this country outside the internet. AND THAT'S WHY NET NEUTRALITY IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE OF OUR TIME! And why WiliLeaks is so critical. WikeLeaks does what Congress and real journalists once did. Bring things out in the open. Without spin.
This brain Dead love child of the Racist,Nazi, Terrorist right should go home to FAUX Noise the Nit Wit noise station of twisted facts and manipulated news. Her dumb ass remark of being afraid, yeah she is rigtht I am afraid , afraid of these Racist
I like Elliott but he does dominate the conversation and BOTH THEIR NAMES are up there...she deserves to have the chance to show how shallow she actually is...and PLEASE give us back voices like Phil's and Bill Moyers and dump most of the media now operating...or at least diminish them...We are so screwed in this country and it is never more evident than when you watch the overpaid media celebrities on cable and network news who are, sadly, now joined by far too many in blogosphere who live off the "celebrity driven news" and simply recycle the first story out there each day. NO REAL REPORTING or presenting issues for the few in America who care...all pandering to the pass through audience who want/need to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK!!! Good luck with that bringing any good changes to this country...I feel for President Obama and feel the worst thing that would happen to him is NOT that he be a one term president...might be worst for US...but then when does that matter?
".... I want to raise something then that we weren't going to raise ..."
Whhhaaaaa? .... did a little truth accidently slip out?
I'm Boycotting NewsCorp! Heres what not to buy: http://www.cjr.org/resources/index.php?c=news...
Like totally?
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
Just don't.
I miss Phil.
I always struggle with the question "How do you tell the difference?" or more accurately, "How do you tell people the difference?"
There is a huge difference between what Phil did and what O'Reilly does. But to the "untrained" ear they sound the same. They use many of the same words and arguments (though not the same volume). They both argue two diametrically opposed positions, and people hear the same sounds.
Perhaps part of the problem is the emotional appeal of today's commentators. Phil asked his audience to think. No one asks that of any audience anymore. Today commentary is like the chase scene in a movie. It goes faster and faster, many fruit stands are overturned, and the sound of the crashes are almost realistic, but when it's over - it takes you nowhere.
It is increasing difficult to convince the majority if you ask of them anything. This includes asking of them to think. It's increasingly easier if you tell them how to feel (emotional appeal). That's not a good trend.
... when we lost "Politically Incorrect," one of the best shows on television, because Bill Maher pushed back against White House propaganda about the 911 terrorists. It isn't cowardly to sacrifice your own life -- it may be stupid or evil, but it isn't cowardly -- but it didn't fit the national monologue to admit that our enemies might be brave too.
CaliforniaMike blogs at All Voices and at his own blogs, http://www.mikerappaport.net/onevoice and at http://oneminutewithmike.blogspot.com.
the Fourth Estate has been dead and buried for decades. There is no more 'free and independent press' seeking out the Truth and informing the citizenry. There is only a bunch of mega-corps doing propaganda and marketing to Sell the American public whatever they and the rest of the Powers that Be PtB) wish to sell: Fear and Lies to keep us distracted and divided.
Real Democracy requires an Educated, Informed and Engaged citizenry to remain viable. The PtB have been working pretty hard for many decades (almost a century, really) to ensure the public is dumbed down and docile. The last 10 years are proof.....
Now, they are working on their "end game" - stealing the rest of the wealth in America and destroy the entire middle class, top-to-bottom. Once they get around to controlling the Inter-Tubes, we're toast.
"Egotism is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of Stupidity" - Frank Leahy
mcdepends has Eight.
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
We only quibble about the term middle class.
The Billionaires will have their Millionaire underlings. Are they part of the middle class?
Whatever, the rest of us will be pushed back into the mud.
statusquObama, change you can only pretend in
I'll never forget Kathleen Parker’s column on May 17, 2008 in the WaPo "Is America getting lost in dash to diversity?" when the villagers were swooning over Obama's family heritage (i.e. black, African father). This opinion column one of the most odious columns ever published in Kaplan and showed the real side of Parker- lily-white, southern girl from the privleged class.
I miss Phil's activism as much as his talk show from back in the 80s. He did so much for women's rights and just to help push America forward. Because of him, women have the right to say "no" inside their own marriage and not be subjected to rape. He showed the first live birth on television. Because of his activism, women have more Civil Rights today than they ever had, including the right to choose for themselves ... I wish he still had his show ...
The stupid (Kathleen Parker) it burns.
http://www.thealders.net/blogs
Just call me Dazed & Confused
I've read parker wants to quit, that will be a good move. If hannity can have his own show, spitzer can too.
Another female out to bring down the credibility of our gender. I wish these know-nothing-think-nothings would either educate themselves or shut up.
What's up with these shows (even if it's some super dumb right wing show) always having women on who are dumber than the men?
For christ sake, my mother's smarter than all of them, sisters too.
Won't be silenced?
This was 6 minutes out of the last 11 years.
Oh yeah, I think I saw Donahue in a segment about 3 years ago for about 4 minutes. So that's 10 minutes out of 11 years.
"Someday somebody related to some of these sufferers, these victims, these collaterally damaged souls, may try to kill you. And I have to tell you, I think you’ll have it coming." - Christopher Cooper
The fatal assumption was that Americans would choose to think and learn, instead of cherry picking the TV channels to reinforce their particular branded choice cultural ignorance, consumer, scientific or political, but especially political.
This is a CNN program for Chrisake! Without Parker we would not have Spitzer. It is a price worth paying. As conservatives go today, Kathleen Parker is about as sane and intelligent as you're going to find. One can at least admire her for not shilling for Fox for now. Once of twice a year I can even agree with her column. Without her I doubt CNN would have felt they could put on Eliot Spitzer due to his past hooker scandal. CNN wanted to avoid a blast of phony outrage from the right and succeeded with this team. With Eliot you get smart understandable presentation of liberal ideas and policies that even CNN viewers can understand. The show provides a platform for Eliot to begin rehabilitating his reputation so we can again have the benefit of his intellectual, policy, and political gifts. Who knows, he might come back enough to run for office again.
proving Donahue's point by taking the corporate defense: "But we were all scared and thought it was true." Except of course, Phil Donahue and the rest of us Dirty F*****g Hippies.
that Parker team up with Mika Brzezinski, but Jim Carey and Jeff Daniels already beat them to it.
"Someday somebody related to some of these sufferers, these victims, these collaterally damaged souls, may try to kill you. And I have to tell you, I think you’ll have it coming." - Christopher Cooper
The media always claims that they are only providing what the viewer wants. Canceling Phil's show is pure proof that ratings mean nothing to the Media executives.
Phil's show was the single top rated show on that network when the executives cancelled him for telling the truth.
America's "Free" Press is strictly controlled by the obscenely wealthy. For the most part they don't care what's on (see Simpson's constant lampooning of Fox 'News'). But that only goes within clearly proscribed limits.
The Obscenely Wealthy in America wanted Bush to start a couple of wars so they (the rich) could loot the Treasury. Phil's show, being the highest rated show at the time, was making a noticeable effect in the propaganda war against the American People: so Phil had to go!
The American Rich need the American Poor to fall for all those lies about Duty and Honor and the security of the Nation in order for them to go kill unarmed women and children for the sole purpose of profiteering from murder and death. Those soldiers wouldn't sign up if Phil's on TV telling the truth about how the wars of Afghanistan and Iraq were all fake from the start.
All war serves only one purpose: war profiteering. There's a reason that rural America has no jobs, it's so the poor kids have only one option: to join the military.
I propose that we all change our terminology. Instead of the War in Iraq, or the War in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and others, we tell the truth. It's War Profiteering in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.
which way to the next war?
We're already well into the fight of our lives, and we've lost.
Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
We're there. It's called "Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace".
Hopefully humanity will one day learn to be humane.
MONOPOLY: And you thought it was a harmless table game!
It all comes down to who controls the media now. Don't blame Parker as she is playing the part that CNN wants her to play. Just on CNN (most other digital/print media) you have the likes of Howie Kurts, Eric Ericson Parker, pick your a$$hat etc... They are bad at their jobs. They are apologists for what is wrong with this country. They still to this day spout debunked stuff as truth/reason/he said he said B.S., but that's what they are paid to do.
Comments are closed on this entry