Go Home

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (521)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (3954)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Rachel Maddow does an excellent job laying out just how badly Republicans hate the unemployed and she summed it up pretty nicely at the end of the segment.

MADDOW: We've got the worst long-term unemployment since the Great Depression. This is going to have repercussions in our country and in our culture for generations. The political leadership we’re seeing on the right in response to that called the unemployed animals, drug test them, call them bums, say they're only out of jobs because they're lazy and want to be. Insult, insult, insult. To add real injury to all of that insult today every Republican in the Senate plus our friend Ben Nelson, blocked a vote on a bill to provide badly needed help to the long-term unemployed in this country.

And as a result, starting tomorrow, more than a million Americans will lose their unemployment benefits. This might sound like something you've heard before. This is the sort of thing that's been knocking around in and out of the headlines for months now. And it's true. It’s because Republicans have blocked extensions of unemployment benefits before. It’s kind of been a Republican hobbyhorse lately.

But in the past, the measure has always been saved at the last minute. That didn't happen this time. Senate Republicans and Ben Nelson really are cutting off the benefits for 1.2 million unemployed people and probably tossing at least some of them out on the street. And as an added bonus, they're giving up the opportunity to stimulate the economy in the most efficient way we know how. Ta da.

We'll see how they behave once they start hearing from their constituents now that the Republicans have actually followed through and stopped the benefits. I'm sure they're counting on as Debbie Stabenow noted voters blaming the party in power for their economic woes and hoping they benefit politically from this, which is truly disgusting. I hope they're wrong because although voters don't always pay a lot of attention to politics, they do tend to pay attention when something directly affects them, and this is going to affect a whole lot of people, both directly and indirectly. All of those people's friends and families are going to feel the brunt of this decision as well. Time will tell if this costs them at the voting booth. This is class warfare and the have-nots are losing it, badly.

Full transcript below the fold.

MADDOW: In 1935, President Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law, which among other things created the bones of unemployment insurance for us as a nation. The idea was you pay into it while you're employed so if you lose your job, there will be money available to help you out. It’s not a coincidence that unemployment insurance was created in 1935. The people who created it and folded it into the Social Security Act and got it passed and signed into law, they knew a thing or two about unemployment.

The backdrop for the creation of unemployment insurance was the Great Depression. unemployment insurance was created not just because the people waiting in the soup lines at the time thought it would be awesome to have some walking-around money. It was created because it was sound economic policy. Obviously having a system of unemployment insurance is in the best interest of anyone who might ever for any reason lose their job. It’s also in the best interest of the country, of our entire economy. For one thing it’s better for everyone if we don't have people who lose their jobs immediately falling off a financial cliff, ending up on the street after their last paycheck. That’s just not good for society, even if you're not personally the person who's on the street.

But unemployment insurance is also a way to stimulate the economy. In the kind of economic situation that we have been in since the deep recession that started in George W. Bush's second term, in which there isn't enough demand in the economy in which there aren't enough people buying things, the government is looking for ways to stimulate economy, to stimulate demand, for ways to get more money into the economy to keep businesses open, to sustain and create jobs, to generate growth. And one of the most efficient, most effective ways to do that talking in economic terms, regardless of your politics, one of the most effective ways to do that, to stimulate the economy, is to put money in the hands of people who need money really badly and who will therefore spend it right away, which is what unemployment benefits do.

Because of the crisis that was caused by the financial collapse, we have the highest rate of unemployment in this country since when we first got unemployment insurance, since the Great Depression, since the '30s. There are nearly six job seekers for every available job in America right now.

One of the most surprising things about politics since the crash happened and since unemployment spiked is how many politicians apparently hate people for being unemployed, hate the unemployed; hate the unemployed, or at least they’re willing to voice that for political reasons. After you pay for unemployment insurance when you have a job, a bunch of politicians apparently think that you are a leech and a bad person for taking those benefits when you need them.

ANGLE: That's what's happened to us, is that we have put in so much entitlement into our government that we really have spoiled our citizenry and said you don't want the jobs that are available.

MADDOW: That's Sharron Angle, the republican running to place Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in Nevada. She thinks people on unemployment, as you just heard, are spoiled.

KYL: And that it doesn't create new jobs, in fact, if anything, continuing to pay people unemployment compensation is a disincentive for them to seek new work.

MADDOW: That's Republican Senator John Kyl of Arizona, who thinks people are unemployed because of unemployment insurance. Same reason I burn down my own house regularly, ever since I got the fire insurance.

Republican Congressman Steve King of Iowa has a similar take about being jobless. He offered up this warning about unemployment benefits in February. “We shouldn't turn the safety net into a hammock. It should actually be a safety net.”

Republican Congressman Dean Heller of Nevada had a take on unemployment benefits that’s twice as derogatory and 17 times as bizarre as that. Here’s how a local newspaper reported on Dean Heller’s position.

Heller said the current economic downturn in policies may bring back the hobos of the Great Depression, people who wandered the country taking on odd jobs… “I believe there should be a federal safety net,” Heller said but he questioned the wisdom of extending unemployment benefits yet again to a total of 24 months, which Congress is doing. “Is the government now creating hobos?” he asked.

If you're out of a job Congressman Heller thinks you may be a hobo.

Republican Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah thinks you're even worse than that.

HATCH: You know, we should be giving people cash who… who basically are just going to blow it on drugs.

MADDOW: Senator Hatch actually proposed an amendment to the jobs bill earlier this month, to force anyone getting unemployment benefits to submit to a drug test, because, you know, land of the free and all that. Now pee in this cup.

Andre Bauer the Republican Lieutenant Governor of South Carolina, compared people on assistance famously earlier this year to stray animals.

BAUER: My grandmother was not a highly educated woman but she told me as a small child to quit feeding stray animals. You know why? Because they breed. You’re facilitating the problem if you give an animal or person ample food supply. They will reproduce, especially ones that don't think too of further than that. And so what you’ve got to do is you’ve got to curtail that type of behavior. They don't know any better.

MADDOW: We've got the worst long-term unemployment since the Great Depression. This is going to have repercussions in our country and in our culture for generations. The political leadership we’re seeing on the right in response to that called the unemployed animals, drug test them, call them bums, say they're only out of jobs because they're lazy and want to be. Insult, insult, insult. To add real injury to all of that insult today every Republican in the Senate plus our friend Ben Nelson, blocked a vote on a bill to provide badly needed help to the long-term unemployed in this country.

And as a result, starting tomorrow, more than a million Americans will lose their unemployment benefits. This might sound like something you've heard before. This is the sort of thing that's been knocking around in and out of the headlines for months now. And it's true. It’s because Republicans have blocked extensions of unemployment benefits before. It’s kind of been a Republican hobbyhorse lately.

But in the past, the measure has always been saved at the last minute. That didn't happen this time. Senate Republicans and Ben Nelson really are cutting off the benefits for 1.2 million unemployed people and probably tossing at least some of them out on the street. And as an added bonus, they're giving up the opportunity to stimulate the economy in the most efficient way we know how. Ta da.

Share This Post

Link To This Post


84 Comments

They coitenly dissed Clenis's stain.


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

Liberal AND Proud's picture

Hopefully the rest of you will remember that after the Democrats retook the majority, the GOP basically BEGGED that the Dems not engage in "class warfare". Of course, the weak kneed and striving to out corporatist the corporatists Democrats complied.

How'd that work out for us.

Rahm Emanuel will remain Chief Of Staff just long enough to fuck up this election and the next one.


"If things don't change, they'll probably remain the same."

LockeNessMonster's picture

I can't believe these members of the GOP are so disconnected, even cruel. I don't know the family and financial histories of all, but I'm guessing none grew up poor, and probably even priviledged. Reminded me when Barbara Bush commented how the Katrina refugees should be happy to be living in the Astrodome because it was an upgrade from their homes in New Orleans. If you are out of work it is obviously because you are lazy and nothing to do with the domestic policies of the previous administration and/or the business practices of the corporate elite.


I've seen some stuff, man. And some thangs...

ixnay's picture

... the GOP knows a significant portion of our population is made of assholes, people who are fundamentally mean spirited selfish pricks.

Part of the secret for success in business involves understanding one's market. And honestly I can't deny the success of the GOP, a party which represents the interests of 5% of the population tops and yet gets 50% of the vote consistently.

So these republicans may seem "disconnected" from an empathetic functional human, but they are fairly well tuned into what their intended voting base wants to hear.

Blue Lensman's picture

I don't doubt that they'll still be able to convince large numbers of citizens to vote against their best interests.

Peter G's picture

devil take the hindmost philosophy is limited to the Republicans? Sure that's core philosophy to the Republican party but it strikes a chord with those who have jobs and are struggling. It comes with a side of "lower taxes cures everything" and it only has to partially work with enough voters in the mid term election to be succesful.


Never attribute to malice...

surfjac's picture

..as does deregulation. Look how well it worked out for w. Not so much for us but we don't really count now do we?


Go away and never darken my towels again!

..republicanism is what won the second world war and if they could do that, why hell, they must the right way to go! I've got news for those folks, this ain't the party of IKE any more!


Go away and never darken my towels again!

Blue Lensman's picture

..for the other side!

bullwinkle_66's picture

...let's hope that these people learn that Ike wasn't president during the Second World War. FDR and Truman were.

Otherwise I agree. Bill Clinton would have made a wonderful Eisenhower Republican.

LockeNessMonster's picture

Sure, they knowingly use guns, god, and gays to get folks to vote against their own economic interests. They all "agree" on those issues and for some reason place those concerns at the top of their list. But here they are basically calling many of those same people low-lifes because they are unemployed. Of course, maybe it's coded in some way to read "not you, god-fearing gun-totin' gay hatin' white folk, but the blacks and the Mexicans and the hippie liberals. But I really can't see how such language is a vote-getter in this economic climate.


I've seen some stuff, man. And some thangs...

Right wing xynophobes have been spouting the same mantra about the poor for eternity. The same old bullshit...lazy, ignorant, childish...it was said about the Irish, the Germans, the Italians, EVERY ethnic group that came to this country seeking opportunity. Blacks hold a special place because they were brought here as slaves, so they are viewed as especially subhuman. Latinos and Hispanics because they look and speak differently.

It's so very old and disheartening that "one step out of the gutter" whites still cling it.


"If things don't change, they'll probably remain the same."

I admire your allegations and concur accordingly. Though I find your claim "especially subhuman", odd in the broader scheme... though not without merit given the facts. Sincerely yours, Orrin Hatch. ;)

surfjac's picture

!


Go away and never darken my towels again!

Tax the Rich's picture

YEp! And dumb a** Obama will make sure he stays right where he's at!

karlo5's picture

Take the money out of politics and NONE of these assholes would have a job either.

Shadowgm's picture

... but it's a good bet they'd still be assholes.

glogrrl's picture

..

dnyknot's picture

to be an asshole 40 hours a week the rest of the time I do it for free !

glogrrl's picture

Rethuglicans in office get paid very well to be assholes....Hey, if they continued to pay us, the great unwashed unemployed, unemployment benefits, we could certainly take extra classes in "assholery"--or we could just observe the collective behavior of the Rethuglican politicians and punditry--finally, a free education!!

dnyknot's picture

how many votes ( from congresscritters ) that would get 1 ? , 2 maybe .

willymack's picture

Yeah, they'd follow the easy money elsewhere, such as drug companies, health insurance companies, or used car lots.

Blue Lensman's picture

I think the class war turned when SCOTUS gave corporations unlimited "free speech".

zorbear's picture

A corporation is a legal fiction that has all the benefits of a person and none of the responsibilities.

Where do I go to stop being a person and become a corporation?

Zach's picture

This could, and should, blow up in the GOPs face. We had a layoff at our company, a high-tech firm, about 18 months ago. Some of the engineers that were laid off are still looking for work. I'd say a majority of them are Republicans or certainly right-leaning. If they would apply their reasoning skills, they would see that they are acting against their own self-interest by supporting the GOP. One more group that the GOP has alienated.

On the other hand, if they can't figure out that they're hurting themselves, then I have a hard time feeling sorry for them.

If they would apply their reasoning skills,

That's the problem...obviously they have no reasoning skills because if they did, they would never have become Rethuglicans in the first place. Let 'em rot with the rest of us.

Seattle_Truthseeker's picture

people that are otherwise brilliant (middle class), spew Repiglick'n talking points from their cubes, and discuss the finer points of Beck! Talk about a disconnect!!! I can't get my ear-phones over my ears fast enough some days.

John S's picture

The best analogy I can think of is the abused wife. "If only I could keep my mouth such, and other people don't do anything to upset him I wouldn't get beat."

Really there is no getting past this reasoning. This is the prism through which they see the world. They're victims of abuse, and after attempting to make it clear to them they still choose to remain republican... We'll there isn't much you can do. Is there?

I'm a software engineer and I honestly don't see how you can have the critical thinking skills required for the job and be a republican.

Yet, my story is much the same as yours. We've been downsized quite significantly over the last two years. But hey, at least the gays can't marry in California...

..a political question and all you get is talking points. No substance, no solutions merely platitudes and talking points. It plays well in Pittsburgh, Peoria and Pleasantville but doesn't do much for America.


Go away and never darken my towels again!

Replace the word "republican" with "Democratic Politician" and it works quite well too...

What they do is, they stop being Rethuglicans, and start being Libertarians...and a few become Tea Baggers. The one thing they DON'T do is start to think...

lewmanbubba's picture

American people want jobs The GOP don't like unemployed why don't we send the american people to where the jobs were sent China, Pakistan, India,Russia. Maybe the GOP will be happy then

surfjac's picture

..(insert out-sourced job company here). How may I fix your problem?


Go away and never darken my towels again!

Handypants's picture

The party of hate strikes again and this time against many of their own.

This is likely to hurt them.


"I know that there are people who do not love their fellow
man, and I hate people like that!
" ~ Tom Lehrer (1928 - )

surfjac's picture

..the republican'ts are probably counting on the fact that all republican'ts are still employed. What?..they're not? Well, then..


Go away and never darken my towels again!

Jack Canuckski's picture

The right wing has always had nothing but disdain for ordinary working people. To them, we are tools, a means to an end, i.e., their further enrichment. Once we find ourselves out of work, since they don't need us any longer, their main concern is to dispose of us with the rest of the garbage.
Still, we continue to believe them and their endless fantasies about "democracy" and "free markets" and the evils of socialism and class warfare.
Unfortunately, they have succeeded so well that we have come to believe them and have come to the point where we have been looking up to them, and down on our fellow working people and ultimately ourselves. That is a large part of the answer to Thomas Frank's question "What's the Matter with Kansas".

mike71654's picture

You are one hundred percent correct!

Is a good thing for America.
As long as we allow republicans to fully participate in government it will be a total loss for everyone. The are just to greedy, ruthless, and stupid, to be in a position of decision making that effects others.

zorbear's picture

Shouldn't that be: "As long as we allow Politicians to fully participate in government..." ?

Remember: no matter who you vote for, a politician gets in.

It not just the republicans...Everyone Senator and Representative is owned by corporate America. They would not piss on you and I if we were on fire. THEY DO OT GIVE A DAMN about us!
Until we finally accept this fact and decide we have had enough nothing will change.

...unemployment benefits...NOT ONE REPUBLICAN SENATOR VOTED TO EXTEND.

I'm willing to bet that if a couple Rethugs had crossed the line, two more Democrats would have run across to the other side.

Don't believe me? Re-check the voting pattern. This time, only one Democrat voted with the GOP. But whenever some of the GOP cross over, more Democrats always vote against their own side...

dnegri's picture

I really wonder what motivates these sophomoric claims that there's "no difference" between the parties.

Maybe it's because I'm 69 years old, a veteran, etc...and have been around long enough to know that there are major differences. And minor ones too, of course.

But I really do wonder what motivates these no difference people. Certainly not experience.

Samson-'s picture

"no" is too sweeping... i think "few" would be more accurate

LockeNessMonster's picture

You can't tell me had Al Gore won, er, I mean, actually been placed in office in 2001 by the Supreme Court things would be exactly the same now, or just slightly different. I will never forgive Ralph Nader for his "no difference between Bush and Gore" self-promotion.
And on the same line, if Bush 41 had been re-elected and then Dole the nation would have still experienced the greatest economic grown in its history. Please.
And thank you for your service.


I've seen some stuff, man. And some thangs...

LockeNessMonster and dnegri:
On the surface with all the talking points of the Dems and Repubs, they do appear different. Then you add the different shades of Repubs and Dems, but underneath, who owns them? In the end they're all bought and paid for. Just follow the money trail. Occasionally you'll get a trail blazer not afraid to shake things up, but the two parties have one thing in common. They both support the philosophy that we should only remain a two party system. Judging both of your comments, you bought into this ideology. Explain to me why the Commission For Presidential Debates exists? Explain to me why third parties have to fight for ballot access in our states? I thought this was a democracy! But I'll be damned and blamed like Ralph Nader for stepping into the political arena if I have a good idea outside of the two party system! Heaven forbid we have a more dynamic political system as they do in European countries. I thought democracy is what we fight for, but we'll be damned and blamed if we don't do it within the confines of the failed two party system. What complete BS! This is not a democracy, and has not been since Ross Perot came along. Remember a time when the Women's League of Voters ran the debates? That ended the minute they told the Dems and Repubs that they had to debate with a third party candidate. Democracy, I think not! Sham, I think it is! I'm open for comment.

LockeNessMonster's picture

not the individual party platforms, which I believe was dnegri's point, and which I agree. Of course neither the Dems or the Repubs want a third party that could take votes from them. Allowing third party candidates in presidential debates is difficult. What should the standard be? It think now it's 15% in polling, and that doesn't seem outlandish to me. Anyone can start a political party and want access. But, apparently, the American public doesn't want third party candidates, either. Nader was on 44 state ballots and DC in 2004, and still only got 2.7% of the vote.


I've seen some stuff, man. And some thangs...

surfjac's picture

..all of them owned by corporate America got to go. I would say vote Progressive but are they any better? The thing is voting is to be used as a force to get the country what it needs: the greatest good for the greatest number. I think that should be the motivating factor but a large part of the population don't see it that way and vote for their own self-interests not the interests of the country nor the consequences of their vote on the future.


Go away and never darken my towels again!

Falmouth's picture

Rachel suggests and raises hell with their Congressman and Senators. Overload their switchboards and computers. And take the stories to the press about it all.

dnegri's picture

More evidence Republicans just use crises for political purposes....
check this CBS Report demonstrating Jindal is lying about the gvt not responding to oil clean up:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/06/24/eve...

Daily kos also has the story up...

HA! I couldn't resist that silly question.

glogrrl's picture

a Rethuglican who politicizes a disaster? What a concept!!

dnegri's picture

or (name your name).....

glogrrl's picture

she brooks no fools and gets straight to the point. For my money, she's the hardest workin' woman in newshow business. You go, girl.

Patriot Actor's picture

I love her "ta da" at the end.....brilliant.

glogrrl's picture

her specialty.

cund_gulag's picture

instead of moving in under the overpass.
I understand you have free medical, dental, and 'three hot's and a cot,' in prison. I know there are some downsides, but the same shit can happen under the overpass.

Eat the rich! I'll take mine medium-rare, 'with a fine chianti, and some fava beans...'

so I'll have to pass.

cund_gulag's picture

Those vermin are full of other vermin.
It's just, if it's well-done, I won't see blood.
And
I
want
BLOOD!

Just kidding, for those who are a bit too literal out there.

Mike K.'s picture

You're right. They are totally insane.

These actions are individually based, ideologically based and values based... take it from there. What motivates them accordingly? What explains the political parties noted anomalies?

Old Billy's picture

For people who keep talking about "entitlements":

After you pay for unemployment insurance when you have a job, a bunch of politicians apparently think that you are a leech and a bad person for taking those benefits when you need them.

Love the Orin Hatch answer. Yep, the new, improved "limited" government wants you to submit a urine sample every twelve hours. By the way, the only good reason to advocate for more drug testing (in 95% of cases) is if you own stock in the testing companies - or maybe if you own stock in the prison industrial complex.

Random teabagger, "Hey! If you don't do drugs, you've got nothing to hide. I'm taxed enough already! Keep your BIG GOVERNMENT hands off my guns and Medicare!"

garcia's picture

and I'm that a only a few of you kind of have spurt what the whole deal is about. Remember that a few weeks ago Beck mention that this summer might be very hot. He meant and also said it, that Liberals will take to the streets with their weapons and create havoc and destruction. He, actually might be onto something. I think that's what the GOP is aiming and expecting. If havoc takes place in this summer, that's the perfect excuse to launch a total devastating campaign of fear of a Communist or Socialist take over in the United Stated. That's exactly what Hitler did in Germany. Remember that the Bolshevik Russian revolution took place in October 1917. The Versailles Armistice was signed on 11 November 1918. Germany was hungry, people were unemployed, and the only hope for them was the promises coming from Russia. In fact the Communist took over Bavaria for a couple months. Hitler with his oratory started to scare the shit out of the Germans which end up being also a Socialist state with German folklore and taste. Hence Die Deutsche Nationalsozialismus Partei. Basically, the Russian Socialism and the German differ and that the Russian is for the proletariat, the German is only for the Germans, Arians, and nobody else. The political situation got really worse in Germany, namely the unemployment. Hitler used that a tool night and day until he finally got what he wanted. What’s the moral of the story? Of course there is no Russian revolution or Communism that we know of. But we have the same symptom: Unemployment. And the GOP is using it to scare the shit of American right wingers of a possible takeover of the Government by the poor people: Socialist. Remember that that is the everyday mime of right-winger press and cable. I have mentioned in several occasions that there is a segment of the American population who would be more that static if a right-wing Government enters the White House. Bush's Government was one. But that was mild in taste. They wouldn’t hesitate to impose a German 1930 type of Government in the United State. All they are doing is patiently waiting for the right time. The minute the eighteen millions Americans try to revolt in the American cities, the militias will come into action. All I pray to God is, that we are able to remain calm and under tight discipline. All they need is an excuse to unleash the NRA on us. Remember that 30% of American always faithful supporters of Bush for the entire eight years? I always wonder who in the fuck these people are. Well, now we know who they are, don’t we?

Seattle_Truthseeker's picture

I am continually amazed at how many people seem to disregard the lessons of history. It is the same over centuries and millenia. It is easy for people to ignore hjistory, to say its just old text book stuff, no longer relevant, however it is as relevant today as it was in past centuries. The NSDAP was the exact and measured result of the German people being put in the same sort of place "merkins" are being placed in today. Fear of the "other" the untermench - the superiority of the Aryan (a fictitious race of people from German mythology), economic collapse, the Reichstag fire, the rise of the fascist nation state, blending corporatism and state in an ugly alliance.It goes on and on. Yes, there are differences, of course! The situation was exacerbated by the embarrasing Treaty of Versaile, by a more direct method of elimination of political competition, and those they no longer needed (in the current case the pee-baggers, in 1939 Germany, the Brown Shirts). Just as 1939 Germany had the night of the long knives, the pee-baggers may very well suffer the same or similar fate, when no longer needed. The differences seen are likely the result of different (somewhat) cultures, and lessons learned from the mistakes made during the third reich.

It might prove to be an interesting exercise to take a sheet of paper, divide it in half and in one column heading write "US 2010" and the other "Germany 1939" and start adding in events. I fear the number of similarities would be glaring, and the number of dissimilarities relatively few. Those who do not learn the lessons of the past are doomed to repeat them.

garcia's picture

The parallels and similarities between and now the 1930's are simply scary. The rich people are wihtholding the money and the jobs with expectation starving the needy with the intention of toppling the Government. I have always said:"America is no banana republic", but if we had uprisen in 2000 against the Supreme Court, we would be a happier nation today.

bullwinkle_66's picture

...I am probably even more disappointed in the Democrats. When push comes to shove, why do the Democrats always give in??? Seriously why won't Reid force those sleazy Republicans to stage a REAL filibuster and make them talk and talk and talk and talk and talk...? The Republicans are able to filibuster because the Democrats let them get away with it.

And in my email box is yet another appeal from the DSCC for more money. Apparently I am supposed to help them keep their jobs, yet they won't fight for the rest of us to keep (or gain/regain) our jobs.

Yes, I will take Democrats any day over Republicans (and twice on Sundays). I just really wish they would learn to play some real hardball, indeed, I wish they would finally treat the GOP the way the GOP treats them.

zorbear's picture

In spite of the news networks overworking the word, there is no "filibuster" in the Senate. That's the House. In the Senate, they have to vote prior to voting. That is, if you want to bring a bill up for a vote, first you have to ask if it's okay. If you don't get at least 60 people saying "yeah, let's vote on it", then you can't vote on it.

The whole Jimmy Stewart thing of talk, talk, talk is a nice riff, but that ain't the way it is in the Senate.

Chickenbone Will's picture

All the Dems that voted for extention in both the House and Senate should answer their offices phones like this:
Office: Good Afternoon,this is Sen/Rep so and so, How can I assist you?
Voter:What happened to my unemployment benefits, they've been shut off, we have nothing to eat...?
Office: If you will call this number,(a Republican Rep. or Republican Senator's telephone number, in their home state)They will be able to assist you, more than this office can!
In otherwords, just start giving out to the voter who called looking for help any Republican officeholders number in the state or DC!

Malleus's picture

Oh, and don't forget the rail, too.

What is it with these people? What do they have for blood, liquid nitrogen? Guess it helps to maintain their cryogenically cold hearts.

Interesting about how you hear nothing at all anymore about 'compassionate conservatism'. Now, the mask is off, and the sneer and the snarl that was always hidden by it is seeing the light of day.

willymack's picture

And a true people's advocate.
Armed with nothing more than the FACTS, she cuts through the layers of bullshit laid down by corporate crooks, and exposes their evil.
She could use our support, folks; she can't do it all alone.
Go to her website and thank her for her valuable service.

Oh, yeah; that website is www.rachelmaddow.com

Roninkai's picture

Christian Values?
Me thinks Jesus would be for helping the poor.

Sunlogic's picture

What Christian values? Would Jesus help the man laying at the side of the road in need, or the man who needs not?

zorbear's picture

What are you, some kind of Commie Terrist?

/snark

fronco's picture

odd and not convincing suprisingly,and no constitutional principles when it comes to the unemployed.just cruel and paralyzing strategy to call an American workers drug addict's.he is old with aging anger and in need of a board certified psychologist.

rider3's picture

I've been out of work since November 09. Since then, I've applied for 53 -- yes, 53 -- jobs. I've interviewed, been called back. However, there are so many applicants that the prospective employers don't even have to follow up with you, even if you made an effort to meet and interview with them. It used to be that I could quit my job before lunch, and have a new job by 5:00. Not any more. And, I'll be taking about a $25,000 reduction in salary no matter where I end up. At this point, I just want to get a job in order to get on a schedule. These politicians have no clue what it's like out there. They should be voted out of office for their insults and non-compassion.

Shit. Ta da indeed.

Mike in Milwaukee's picture

She's the only reason I wish I still had cable.

JohnnyBravo's picture

Billions for corrupt banks: Check.
Billions for war invasion: Check.

Any money or jobs for the hurting Americans:
Not a chance.


Peter: Oh my god, Brian. There's a message in my Alpha Bits. It says, 'Ooooooo.'
Brian: Peter, those are Cheerios.

chervilant's picture

Time for these heartless, clueless, hedonistic parasites to take a pay cut, and to cut their benefits to the bone so we can reduce the national debt even MORE!

The radical income inequity that characterizes our contemporary economy seems to be a part of the calculated effort by the exceptionally wealthy to compel the exceptionally poor (and exceptionally well-armed) among us to 'eradicate' the gay-loving, communist-leaning, fascist, socialist, damned liberals who are 'ruining our nation.' Since liberals tend to be pacifists, modern conservatives seem most likely to respond to this economic crisis with deadly force. Too bad these easily-manipulated, under-educated, and misinformed masses do not understand that they do NOT have a membership in the uber elite.

chervilant's picture
OH,

and, BTW, I am unemployed and struggling to become certified as a teacher. Dubyah's "No Child Left Behind" legislation forces me into the unenviable position of having ONE and ONLY ONE person's opinion determine when and even WHETHER I can sit for my certification!

Since my first administrator decided I was the "worst first year teacher [she] ever worked with," I must now overcome that black mark, which was based solely on her opinion and not on my proven ability to teach (math, ironically!). A word of caution: never use a word in front of your principal that he or she is unlikely to recognize.

If I don't get a teaching contract for the coming school year, I will be homeless AND I will have to begin my certification process all over again. Isn't that just rich?

zorbear's picture

Billions for Banks!
Billions for Wall Street!
Billions for Oil!
Trillions for War!
(and nothing for you...)

Tax the Rich's picture

All of my unemployed republican in-laws are now considered lazy low-lifes by their GOP buddies. I love pointing this out to them.

I'm sure there are plenty. Perhaps the GnoP figures that once the unemployed are thrown out in the streets they won't be eligible to vote.

karneos27's picture
[Comment Deleted By Administration For Violation Of Terms Of Service]