Go Home

Due to a recent server outage, our video archives are currently unavailable. We are working as fast as we can to remedy this. Thanks for your understanding.

BP Plans to Get Rid of Safety Watchdog

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (564)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (803)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Another day, another reason not to trust BP to handle anything properly in the response to this disaster in the Gulf of Mexico.

GRIFFIN: For 26 years, Jean Pascal was a lawyer for the Environmental Protection Agency, investigating and helping to prosecute some of the worst environmental polluters in the northwest, including oil companies in Alaska. The worst of the worst, she says, is British Petroleum.

You describe BP as a serial environmental criminal.

JEAN PASCAL, FORMER EPA LAWYER: I have.

GRIFFIN: You believe that?

PASCAL: I do.

GRIFFIN: BP has pled guilty to illegally discharging oil in Alaska and also faces a criminal complaint, alleging it violated clean air and water laws. Pascal retired earlier this year, so she is now free to speak out about a company she says repeatedly violates environmental laws.

PASCAL: From my perspective, BP has, for a long time, been a company that is interested in profits first and foremost. Safety and health and environment are subjugated to profit making. And I do not think that has changed.

GRIFFIN: In congressional hearings after the fatal explosion at BP's Texas refinery in 2005, lawmakers asked BP's then CEO, did workers warn about safety issues at the plant? He said they had not.

Then there were questions about whether they feared retaliation for speaking up.

Bottom line, after pressure from lawmakers, BP opened an independent ombudsman's office to manage and to hear the safety concerns of its workers. It's run by a former federal judge, just not here in Alaska.

It's a very small office, tucked away inside this office building here in Washington, D.C. But British Petroleum has been running this employee complaints program for several years.

The independent former judge who runs the unit refused to comment to CNN.

Michigan congressman Bart Stupak was one of those who pressured BP.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The entire reason that office came to fruition was because of safety.

REP. BART STUPAK: Was because of safety, yes, and safety concerns continue yet today.

GRIFFIN: Since the ombudsman's office opened, 112 BP workers have come forward to file reports, 35 of them deal with, quote, system integrity or safety issues and the ombudsman's office says they are extremely serious.

But "Keeping Them Honest," sources close to the ombudsman's office tells CNN BP doesn't like it, and its independent investigators and that it doesn't like employees reporting safety problems outside the company.

A union representative says some BP workers who complained have faced retaliation. Jean Pascal agrees.

PASCAL: Many of the employees who have actually reported safety, health, environmental and safety issues, particularly in Alaska, have been retaliated against. They've been demoted. They've been terminated, and they've also been blackballed.

GRIFFIN: A BP spokesman tells CNN the company has, quote, "a zero tolerance policy regarding retaliation." The company, he says, "is unaware of any unresolved cases that violate the policy."

And there's this. Not long after he took over as chairman of BP America, Lamar McKay met with Congressman Stupak.

STUPAK: One of the first things Mr. McKay said was, "I'm going to replace the ombudsman. I'm going to shut her down."

And we said, "What do you mean?" He wasn't even on the job but a few weeks and maybe a month or two. And he started wanting to shut down the ombudsman, and we encouraged him not to do so.

GRIFFIN: Doesn't it stun you that he would make that remark?

STUPAK: Yes, it did. We were shocked that they would even bring it up in like the first meeting and then in the second meeting we had with them.

The logic was, well, we'll make things better. Well, we don't see...

GRIFFIN: Their logic was "trust us"?

STUPAK: Trust us.

GRIFFIN: You don't?

STUPAK: No.

GRIFFIN: BP has said it can do a good job investigating complaints through an established internal system without the ombudsman's office.

I think at some point a reasonable person has to come to the conclusion that this is a company that has no intention of changing its mode of operation, that the dollar is going to be paramount and that the health, safety and safety of American workers and the American environment are a secondary or tertiary concern.

GRIFFIN: Before the Deepwater Horizon disaster, BP promised Stupak in writing, that its watchdog unit would be in place for at least another year. But a source inside the ombudsman's office tells CNN, "Frankly, I'm surprised we're still here."

Drew Griffin, CNN, Seattle.

Share This Post

Link To This Post


16 Comments
project's picture

We don't need know stinking safety!

project's picture
BP!

BP same as the GOP!

Stupid Git's picture

There was a safety watchdog? Well, maybe they already made sure everything is safe and they're not needed anymore? :)

Gene214's picture

The "watchdog" was busy doing crystal meth and watching porn.


If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders.

George Carlin

Evet's picture

oil gusher has vanished from the front pages of The New York Times and even The Huffington Post. Nobody gives a shit anymore.

Handypants's picture

"BP has, for a long time, been a company that is interested in profits first and foremost."

As opposed to those companies who put profit somewhere down the list?

*scratches head*


"I know that there are people who do not love their fellow
man, and I hate people like that!
" ~ Tom Lehrer (1928 - )

Evet's picture

Once the wave action drops below about 3 – 5 ft then the cap on the well will be replaced. They have to undo 24 bolts to do this and that will need almost a calm sea to get the old riser end off the well, and the new cap in place

Leave it to our government to plant palm trees in the middle of an oil spill.

http://gcn01.com/

Gene214's picture

That's Obama. During the G20 summit, Obama and David Cameron agreed that BP must not be forced to collapse. That's right. Fuck the Gulf; Fuck the environment; Fuck the Gulf residents who have lost their livelihoods. What really matters to this President, is that BP not be punished too severly. Mark my words - this fucking guy is a one-termer. Don't punish BP - shit! If we had a President with real balls, he would have told Cameron that, if the Oil Spill isn't stopped, like yesterday, and if the Gulf and it's people are not made completely whole, we'll crush your company with lawsuits. But that will never happen because, as the title of my post suggests, Obama is less than useless (by the way, I'm one of those suckers who bought the hope and change bullshit in it's entirety. That will never, ever happen again).

Here's the link to the Telegraph UK article:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysect...


If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders.

George Carlin

skycypher's picture

Formula: Break up BP BEFORE they have completely fulfilled their responsibility in this and you have a high probability of NEVER getting the comprehensive money and effort out of BP for their disastrous fuck up! Your idiotic rant about Obama appeases only the remorse you pretend to feel about your choice for President. Obama and Cameron are not knee-jerk decision makers like you. The article you reference presents no "less than useless" indicators as you suggest. Grow up, and leave the big decision making to the adults.

upchuck's picture

I hate to say this, but as a voter that voted for Nader everytime he ran for President.

I TOLD YOU SO!

This is what it all boils down to;

The Democrats and Republicans accept the same bribes(I mean campaign contributions) from the same people.

Something all of you should of thought about when you voted for Gore or Obama.

Gene214's picture

That's how corporate CEO's and politicians say "Fuck You!"


If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders.

George Carlin

Abbybwood's picture

Yeah?

Well, I say let's GET RID OF BP!!!!!!!!


"The US has an army of 90,000 soldiers in Afghanistan and is spending $100bn a year, but has still been unable to defeat 20,000-25,000 Taliban who receive no pay at all." - Patrick Cockburn

Excelsior's picture

It's a frigging OIL COMPANY. Of COURSE they don't care about safety or the environment. Ruining the environment is what the oil industry is ALL ABOUT. Their business is sucking petroleum out of the ground, a process that involves pollution and environmental destruction as a matter of course, in order to create products that by their very definition POLLUTE and DESTROY THE ENVIRONMENT.

That any and every oil company will ALWAYS put profit first is simply the logical corollary to their business. How can any of this be a surprise or a puzzle to anybody???


There's always free cheddar in the mousetrap, baby. - Tom Waits

thebassguy's picture

Let's make sure to let the admin know we want them to STOP the Alaska
offshore projects. For a few months worth of oil, we can destroy the
area for a hundred years, with just one small accident. Read the Rolling Stone piece.

Comments are closed on this entry