McLaughlin Group: Poor John McLaughlin
By bluegal Monday Nov 24, 2008 5:30am
Shorter McLaughlin Group:
Pat Buchanan - Obama needs to take over the economy before Inauguration Day or disaster will strike!
Monica Crowley - Government spending bad!
Mort Zuckerman - I'm the token liberal on this show? Bwa ha ha! I sold short? Double bwa ha ha!
Eleanor Clift - As the real token liberal on this show, poor people suffer more than you, McLaughlin!
John McLaughlin - Do NOT!






Login or Register to post comments.
why has this dinosaur of a show not gone the way of crossfire?
it has, tho, been a reliable weathervane of conservative failure ever since i can remember...
oh, and frist!
"why has this dinosaur of a show not gone the way of crossfire?"
Darn good question. And bravo bluegal, for getting this offensive Wall Street lovin' main street hatin' old bastard's name in a headline.
He and the AARP are duping millions of seniors and other people who believe they're more neutral than they really are, while privately benefiting from every Insurance or health related corporation out there.
Take a look at the website of this 'star' of PBS. It's a damn billboard deserving of your SPAM file -but nothing else.
McLaughlin is a tired old Republican stack of shit. He allows fellow old white man bigot Buchanan rant bullshit on and on, and lets that dumbass Crowley do her best Palin imitation each week all while cutting anything Eleanor Clift has to counter short. I had to stop watching that right wing bullshit show.
I like what Pinky and the Brain called the McLaughlin Group, the McLoudness Group.
It started with the Brain trying to take over the world when Bill Clinton is caught jogging in shorts, and somehow ends with Joyce DeWitt being sworn in president.
I'd have followed Joyce DeWitt in her 70's gym jogging shorts to the gates of hell.
Technically you still have that opportunity. But why will you be wearing her jogging shorts?
"Last night I shot an elephant in my Pajamas and how he got in my pajamas I'll never know." Groucho Marx.
Yes - same essential joke. I've always loved that one.
Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
Groucho's full pajama joke...
"One morning I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got in my pajamas, I'll never know. ... While shooting elephants in Africa, I found the tusks were very difficult to remove. But in Alabama, the Tuscaloosa."
and for the hell of it a little lite entertainment...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wtc9a4TgRus
I'm sure Larry was eager to get into Janet's shorts.
Jack too for that matter.
But I oft thought that his shorts were shorter.
...When Mr. Roper came in and caught us going at it, I accidentally pulled her shorts on as we scrambled around comically.
Oh man, that's enough material for a two-part episode!
that was the basic material for the whole series :)
First season though, she was kind of plain. But within a couple of seasons she had these bangs and mascaraed eyes.
You ever seen the movie Stay Tuned starring John Ritter and Pam Dawber? They starred as a couple sucked into their TV satellite system, appearing in multiple shows. At one point Ritter's character finds himself on what looks like the Three's Company set and dead ringers for Chrissy Snow and Janet Woods and he screams.
Now Pam Dawber... *sigh*
http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/blurbex/file...
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3199/241141450...
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http:/...
What about
http://www.robotsandwrestlers.com/wp-content/...
Too 80's?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6d...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem...
The only reason for watching "Buck Rogers in the 25th Century"...Col. Wilma Deering!
about Erin Grey's anatomy!
Some more Grey's Anatomy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsI2WkribXo
Though the current financial crisis is well and truly Bush's fault, and Bush will continue to be president until 1/20/09 everyone is talking about how either Obama can or can't fix it.
WTF?!?! Its like they've all agreed before hand that Bush can't do it, so no need to discuss it. Thats fine for the liberal pundits on the panel, but for the conservatives to ignore their own guy's monumental failure and focus on how Obama's not going to be doing the right thing to save the economy, that Bush should be doing right now, is just disgusting.
how the fuck did crowley get a gig on this show
how much government expenditure under bush was an investment in the future?
and werent these aholes just a few months ago panning obama's speech in germany as him acting like a president before he had won anything?
the beltway boys tried this on sunday too
he isnt prez until innaugeration...end of story
bush is inept? we have known that for 7 years
my wife and i agree that the only way crowley got the gig was to sleep with the old man.
...but she's not stupid - she's just adopted stupid political views.
She and McLaughlin both have PhD's from Columbia University - his in philosophy, her in international relations. And, she used to work for Richard Nixon in some capacity, so that's likely where she went astray.
...gives them a automatic pass to intelligent thought. I've met and worked with lawyers from Stanford, Northwestern, Georgetown, etc. who outside of their academic element, were as bright as a bag of nails.
If Crowley is intelligent, she doesn't sound like it and surely hasn't been as of late....she's been dead wrong on every fucking thing.
how the fuck did crowley get a gig on this show
my wife and i agree that the only way crowley got the gig was to sleep with the old man.
As with Larry King and every other old wealthy fart/shark, money is bait and McLaughlin used it to nabbed himself a very very very young wife.
As for Crowleys role, as we saw with him and Buchanan -who go way back together- when Palin came on the scene their slobbering over her proved the only thing that matters to old wealthy men is more money and tits. She has both.
Excellent points, Uncle Joe!
However Bush has been spending, a lot! His wars are increasing in costs yet are totally off budget. Plus, these bailouts are also Government spending. Sure, those that received the bailout money will take it and replenish their balance sheets. Then, they will turn right around and continue with business as usual and when they fail again they will be right back there with their hands out asking for more. George Bush and those like him have never been and are not fiscally Conservative. The difference between George Bush's spending and Obama's is that Obama's Government spending will actually bear fruit at some point. Bush's spending has been just flushing taxpayer money down the toilet.
hiring at the time.
Is there a Sunday political show that isn't a Rebublican stroke-fest?
Fox News Sunday = Lets rehash all last weeks Republican talking points.
Meet the Press = Lets see what the comming weeks Republican talking points are going to be.
This Week = Lets let a centrist on to discuss an issue, then rip apart everything they just said, and proclaim the nation a center right country.
Face the Nation - Nobody watches us, but we'll still lob softballs in there for the Republicans to hit em outta the park, 'cause America is great.
I don't think bush gives a damn about the economic mess he has created. After the last yelling of "wolf" by Paulson and his telling us the banks would fail if the giant stimulus package wasn't passed, only now to watch one bank after another fail, why the fu*k would anyone believe anything today?
there is no reason for him to care about anyone else.
What does it feel like to be on the wrong side of history? I ask you, Pat Buchanan!"
I really don't think Pat gives a crap. With the money he's making on NBC, MSNBC, McLaughin, etc., he'll just keep spewing as long as his lips will move.
JOHN, YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT JOHN, WHATEVER YOU JUST SAID ...CAN YOU HEAR ME OK,.. JOHN?? JOHN, NEVER DID ANY OF US BELIEVE OUR COUNTRY WOULD BE RULED BY A BLACK TERRORIST AND AN ARMY OF POOR DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS. I'M SCARED SHITLESS JOHN... IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT ...WE'RE ALL DOOMED, JOHN!
I've been a watcher of McLaughlin for over 3 years now, every sunday when it plays back here locally.
Zuckerman - While I know he is no progressive, he is terribly pragmatic and understands economic issues better than most. Well before anyone was publicly talking about economic troubles he was all doom and gloom on the show. They use to mock his rants. Now he was right and liquidated most of his assets in anticipation of the crisis. I take his advice on how to fix it very strongly.
Crowley - A joke.
Buchanan - My second favorite conservative to George Will. I definately disagree with both, but can we not be civil? At least they can be debated with.
McLaughlin - Somewhat of a laugh himself, but occasionally he impresses.
I've loved the show, it is my favorite pundit show out there. The exchange about them being "hurt" by the economy was pretty silly, and I'm glad clift told them that...
http://www.zippyvideos.com/5171469584804106/t...
I can't help but watch the show - it's a train wreck.
Dana Carvey is outstanding as McLaughlin. Thanks for giving me a big laugh this morning!
Its been a long time but if I remember correctly at one point he asks: Why do I conduct my show in this manner?
Great bit.
Dana Carvey - one of the best ever.
D'ja hear after their cable access show was cancelled Wayne and Garth became Feng Shui consultants? "No Shui," "Yes Shui!"
I honestly want to know, because judging from the posts on this site, it would appear that the left supports government bailouts of these transnational corporations.
Is that a fair assessment, or is there some opposition on the left to these government bailouts?
Please, no flames, I'm not trying to troll, I honestly want to know where the opinion stands on this issue.
Problem is the current situation is the fault of conservatives. Now you want to saddle the Left with the blame if we do what needs to be done to keep everyone from losing their homes or jobs?
I HATE the bailouts. I think the TARP is the biggest case of theft in human history but lets also remember that the TARP plan was a republican plan.
EDIT: I can't speak for others obviously. For me, I'm against it, but as I said, I'm not happy about applying my likes or dislikes to decisions that could result in lost jobs or homes. Bottom line I hate the bailouts. If companies can't fail in a free market, then we have no free market. So I'm willing to let a hopefully competent Obama administration handle it, but always with recognition about who got us here and that I never want to hear conservatives talk about free market again.
bailouts.
Personally, I support helping the automakers to some extent, far less so to the "saving" of the AIGs and other financial institutions.
I don't think there is a single position on any issue that is uniformly embraced by "the left," whatever that is.
I'm not exactly for just handing out taxpayer money to every failed business out there. From my perspective that business, be it a bank, automaker or what have you had better come up with a strategy to improve their profit margins if they want any sort of Government bailout. After all, it does no good to throw money at a failed enterprise. Sure, that bailout money will keep that business afloat a little longer. However, if that business doesn't change its operations, improve its product or reduces its expenditures (I.E. slash wages, etc.) to remain competative on the global market then that business is doomed to fail no matter how many bailouts you give it.
I should clarify when I say posts on this site, I don't necessarily mean posts by commenters, rather, the main posts/topics/articles and what is written with them. For example, the Ben Stein/Cavuto post a few posts down from this one.
I can see the point of supporting the bailouts to fix a republican problem, however, I fear that we are working towards the idea that more insanity can cure insanity.
I say the following as a currently unemployed individual, we need these large corporations to fail. We need the economy to restructure, and we need to move on to a new economic structure that will survive this new globalized marketplace. The longer we cling to the past, the harder it will be to adapt to a new world in the next crisis.
Yes I realize this means many will lose their jobs, their homes, fall into bad health, etc. I realize this will drag down the economy to points not yet imagined. I am extremely sympathetic to that sentiment and I am fully cognizant that it may be several months before I myself find a new job if we let all these corporations fail. However, I would rather wait several months for a good job that won't disappear anytime soon rather than get a job next week only to get laid off again in another month.
So again, we as a nation brought ourselves to this point. All of these issues can be traced back decades based on political, economic, monetary, and fiscal policies supported by both parties (yes, more geared to the right, but banks and automakers butter both sides of the bread). The only cure for this ailment is to let it all fall now before the next crisis is much worse.
I think a large part of the problem, especially when it comes to the automakers is that they have lost their competative edge. There has been little to no competition for them for decades and now we see foreign automakers moving up fast.
Ya think?
The BIG problem is that NOBODY knows for sure what will work. The smartest economists disagree on what to do. It is so very complex that it would take days and weeks of just thinking about it and talking about it and discussing it with people who really understand it to have a decent idea of how difficult it is. How to fix it? Like John McCain and finding Osama bin Laden, I will tell you when I am elected President. In the mean time I think that maybe there is a lot of credit card debt that will have to be wiped out before this is done. People need money to spend and making interest only credit card payments on an insane amount of debt is taking away people's discretionary spending now that people cannot borrow any more money because they are maxed out ( see how complex it gets in just a couple sentences?). Find a dart board and write some "postits" and paste them on the board and throw a dart and try that solution.
Everytime this administration has cried panic and demanded a fast vote, it has turned out bad for the country. I think many in congress didn't believe this sort of bs would come from the treasury, but it did. Once again the people lose.
If the top guys at the auto industry were replaced by someone who knows how to run a company rather than people who knows how to rob a company, I would be in favor of a loan for them. As for the banks, they looked the other way while mortgages and credit cards were handed out like candy to hungry children. They made their bed, now let them sleep in it. Maybe that's not possible, but it's my attitude right now.
Disaster Politics
or maybe its Compassionate Conservatism, I forget.
I'm sure glad someone else watches any of these shitty shows, so I don't have too. I can come on C&L Monday morning and see and hear all the things I didn't miss.
The administration has been behind the curve of this economic disaster. Here in my area of Florida, people have already lost their homes and their jobs. Companies are already failed and gone by the wayside. Sure there will be more trouble to come, but what about those who have already lost everything, what of them and what of their future? Their credit has already gone down the tubes and I have no idea how long it will take them to recuperate or how they will do it. It appears to be a lose lose for these people no matter what goes on in DC.
I wonder when the Nevada brothels will be asking the government for a hand?
Honestly, does anyone with a life watch that show?
I know Obama has Buffet, and I know what Roubini and Krugman are saying, but there are great number more economists and business leaders saying we can't spend our way out of this, you can't add debt to debt and expect it to work. I hope this is the info Obama is getting behind the scenes.
The bailout will not work folks, but I am going to add info here that will help people understand why it won't. Their has not been a good explanation put forward as to how a bail will work (not even by the 3 well respected fore mentioned) and there are better detailed proposals that will work, so I put one forward now. At the bottom of my post, in just today I have added links reaffirming what I have pounded out directly below, I hope C&L readers receive this well, it is intended as an appeal.
Some time back I read a book titled ‘The Dollar Crisis – Causes, Consequences, Cures’ by Richard Duncan published in 2003 updated in 2005 that discussed the issues we were facing then, and what might happen today. If I could type the whole book and post it here I would. You might find the excerpts I have typed below interesting, I include the issue we are facing now, ‘Deflation’ which just happens to be the chapter title and how a bailout in our current situation will not work.
I also wanted to add some solutions so I included a small part that lays out better alternatives, what good is bitching if you have no solutions? I hope everyone reads this and enjoys.
If you think the bailout or stimulus packages will work, he goes onto explain a dynamic called a liquidity trap we are likely to experience as a result, his conclusion:
If we persist in the direction that is now being embraced our options to avoid a global depression is hyperinflation or resort to war. However he presents the following to alter our course.
About the Author: Richard Duncan has worked as a financial analyst in Asia for more than 16 years, conducting research and publishing investment reports on companies, industries, and economies from India to Korea.
In 1993, Mr. Duncan was one of the first to warn of the impending collapse of the Thai economy and the Thai stock market in a series of published reports and speeches directed at institutional investors. At the height of the Asian crisis, he worked as a consultant for the International Monetary Fund in Thailand. Subsequently, he joined the World Bank in Washington DC as a Financial Sector Specialist focusing on issues related to the economic crisis in Asia.
http://www.business-in-asia.com/books/dollar_...
FT - Bring back the link between gold and the dollar - By Richard Duncan just this morning
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ba673d22-b977-11dd-...
WSJ - The Fed Is Out of Ammunition
A discredited dollar is a likely outcome of the current crisis.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1227489125335...
Market Watch - Dramatic downturn seen for economic data
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/harsh-e...
Breitbart - Worst of financial crisis yet to come: IMF chief economist
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=08112...
Just doing my best to give C&L readers a different perspective.
:)
Obama Has Buffet?
There goes the slim figure.
Interesting. I thank you and I appreciate it.
"The Ghetto Walk" is a pretty good track, and John rips a really raunchy/gutsy solo.
Nyuk.
I wonder how they would have reacted if Eleanor Clift asked if any of them has to live paycheck to paycheck or if they are in danger of loosing their homes. Perhaps they wouldn't have been laughing so hard.
The discussion on this show is very thin. None of these people really have much indepth knowledge on what they talk about. Although they think they do.
Mostly just a shout feast of egos.
These people are not the best minds in America.
Usually, just a very cheesie discussion of their interpretation of the politics of the issues. I am not sure they even have the politics right. I think Obama has changed the rules of the game and has rewritten the play book. All of the guests on this show still think in a very old and behind the times way. No really interesting analysis or ideas here.
This show should be replaced with something fresh and something that really reflects the times.
Pat is trying to change sides for employment reasons
Monica doesn't know if she'll still have her radio job, but fines it hard to except a Black President.
John is just still in shock but trying to fake it.
Mort just says anything as he thinks of ways to be an insider
Eleanor is the only person who has been right every week and calls it as she sees it. She makes all of them look like what they are complete idiots.
I have to say I have been enjoying Robert Kuttner on these talk shows lately. He looks like a meek Wally Cox-like person but he takes no shit from the wingnuts and he does it in a calm manner. He is the first progressive I have seen on these circle jerk pundit shows who absolutely doesn't let RW talking points go unanswered, no matter how casually they are thrown out by people like David Brooks. He had George Will in a tizzy yesterday. Mother Superior George Will is not used to being challenged by smart, articulate, calm-speaking dissenters who happen to be right and who won't let Will get the last lying word. I like Mr Kuttner and I will read the online American Prospect for a while to see how I like it.
Oops. My previous post was supposted to be posted in reply to someone else's thoughts about pundit shows in general, not just the McLaughlin Report. I don't know why it showed up separately.
The American Prospect is an excellent magazine. I highly recommend it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KMV3dc2PbI
Has anyone ever thought to him/herself, "I wonder what Pat Buchanan has to say about this subject, I sure hope he's on teevee"?
Then there is Monica Crowley.
Apparently, there's a very thin bench for the Sunday nooz* shows.
*may contain news-like substance.
is DESPARATE to lay the blame for all of this at Barack's feet... they make me sick! They blamed Clinton for EVERYTHING for eight years... and now that W has CRASHED AND BURNED our military, our good standing in the world, and our economy too... they all want to shift responsibility AGAIN to Obama WHO DOESN'T EVEN TAKE OFFICE TILL JANUARY.
They are all pugnatious assholes.
Blame this on George W. Bush.
Login or Register to post comments.