Go Home

Jim Cramer

17 documents found in 0 seconds.

Norquist: 'Tea Party' Two is Going to Dwarf 'Tea Party' One

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (165)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (1488)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

On this Sunday's Meet the Press, Grover Norquist repeated his claim that the so-called "tea party" is going to come back stronger than ever now that President Obama has been re-elected: Grover Norquist's Fascinating Theory:

Grover Norquist, despite what some might construe as recent evidence to the contrary, is nothing if not bullish on the future of his brand of radical anti-tax ideology:

“We are about to have a Tea Party second wave that will dwarf the first wave and that is because while ‘spend too much’ brought the Tea Party into existence, we’re about to walk into ‘spend too much, regulate too much, and tax too much,’ all together. It’s going to be a perfect storm of annoying government behavior, which is devastating to the economy, and I think the small business community which is particularly hit by Obama’s tax increases are going to lead the fight bigger, stronger, tougher than the last Tea Party.”

Yes! And then this will happen.

Look out everybody! Grover's coming with another army of angry seniors playing dress-up again! Be afraid... be very afraid! Who needs Fox when we've got Meet the Press, with two CNBC hacks, an anti-tax zealot lobbyist, and a moderator who parrots Republican talking points at every opportunity, balanced out by one Democrat.

And as a reminder, there is no "tea party." It's an AstroTurf rebranding effort designed to try to get the Bush-stink off of the word Republican.

Continue reading »



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (204)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (383)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

As Rachel Maddow noted on her show this Tuesday night, if you happen to be lucky enough to be related to a television host and celebrity like Jim Cramer, have a huge Twitter following, or lucky enough in some other way to garner enough national attention to embarrass their Gov. Tom Corbett, there's no problem with that voter suppression in Pennsylvania at all.

On the other hand, if you're one of the hundreds of thousands of unlucky schmucks who do not have the proper identification that the state is now trying to require, well, you're on your own and at the mercy of the courts as to whether they're going to allow Pennsylvania to attempt to steal the presidential election for Mitt Romney.

Now if we could just get all of the voters there a famous son like Jim Cramer's dad, and problem solved!

How Jim Cramer Solved His Dad’s Voter ID Mess In 7 Hours:

Are you one of hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvania voters who lack the type of photo identification required by the state’s voter ID law? If your son is a rich cable news personality with a big Twitter following, the state of Pennsylvania is on the case.

As TPM reported earlier, CNBC’s Jim Cramer tweeted on Tuesday morning that his father — a World War II veteran named Ken — would lose the ability to vote under the state voter ID law because he “does not drive, he is elderly, and can’t prove his citizenship.”

Less than seven hours later, the “Mad Money” host tweeted that authorities with Pennsylvania’s transportation office “came directly to the rescue” of his father.

So how did it happen so fast? Needless to say, the reach of the younger Cramer, who has more than a half million Twitter followers and a net worth reportedly in the tens of millions of dollars, had a lot to do with it.

Jan McKnight of the Pennsylvania Department of Transporation told TPM that a fellow staffer alerted her to Cramer’s tweet with an email. McKnight was then able to contact Cramer’s publicist. The publicist gave Cramer’s family a phone number for McKnight.

“I can’t go into the details because of privacy issues, but we were able to help him,” McKnight told TPM. She also said she has helped other people get IDs after reading accounts of their struggles in the news.

McKnight said the agency recently began offering a “safety net” form of photo identification, which is given to voters lack a birth certificate but have a Social Security number. The agency issued 472 of those IDs from the first day they were available on Aug. 27 through Sept. 7. PennDOT’s Philadelphia branch alone issued 286 of them.

Besides transportation officials, a congressional staffer also reached out to Cramer on Tuesday and offered to help the cable host’s father. The staffer never got a response. But he later said the case was another example of the problems created by the rush to enact restrictive voting laws.

“Cases like Mr. Cramer’s show that ID laws are about disenfranchising eligible voters, not preventing fraud,” staffer Gregory Abbott told TPM. “Many don’t yet realize that its affecting them or someone they know.” [...]

Pennsylvania’s voter ID law was upheld by a Republican judge last month. It will go before the state Supreme Court on Thursday. Justice Department officials are also investigating whether the law is discriminatory under the Voting Rights Act. The state has admitted that more than 750,000 registered voters lack an adequate form of state-issued photo identification.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (117)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (1112)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Here's some of how CNBC hosts John Harwood and Maria Bartiromo opened up the GOP debate in Rochester, MI tonight:

HARWOOD: The candidates will have 60 seconds to respond to questions, 30 seconds for follow-ups and rebuttals. Those will be at the discretion of the moderators.

We also want you, the candidates, to help us out a little bit, by answering the questions as directly and specifically as you can. I know you want to. You have proven that. But just in case you get off topic, maybe by accident, we may have to interrupt you.

BARTIROMO: Throughout the evening tonight we will be joined by an all-star lineup of the smartest people on CNBC.

First up tonight, Jim Cramer, the host of "Mad Money."

Jim, welcome.

CRAMER: Thank you, Maria.

Their lineup also included mister king of the "tea partiers" himself, Rick Santelli. For a little reminder of how either of those two should be treated here is John Amato's post on Jon Stewart making mincemeat of Cramer from March of 2009 on The Daily Show.

And as Think Progress reminded us in their live blog of the debate tonight:

Moderator Jim Cramer asks a question premised on his position “at the front lines” of the stock market. For the record, following his stock advice is slightly worse than picking stocks by flipping coins.



Gingrich Attacks #OWS Protesters as Clueless About History

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (227)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (2149)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Repeating his questions to Mitt Romney and Rick Perry on whether companies can both be profitable and create jobs, CNBC's Jim Cramer followed up by asking former Speaker Newt Gingrich if companies can do both as well. Gingrich responded by slamming the media and Occupy Wall Street protesters for not understanding American history and Newt's view that apparently it's corporations that have made the United States the greatest country in the world.

GINGRICH: Look, obviously, corporations can and should do both and what is amazing to me is the inability of much of our academic world, much of our news media and most of the people in Occupy Wall Street to have a clue about history.

In this town, Henry Ford started as an Edison Electric supervisor who went home at night and built his first car in the garage. Now, was he in the 99 percent or the 1 percent? Bill Gates drops out of college to found Microsoft. Was he in the 99 percent of the 1 percent. Historically, this is the richest country in the history of the world because corporations succeed in creating profits and jobs and it's sad that the news media doesn't report accurately how the economy works.

BARTIROMO: Mr. Speaker, What is the media reporting inaccurately about the economy?

GINGRICH: What?

BARTIROMO: What is the media reporting inaccurately about the economy?

GINGRICH: I like humor disguised as a question. That's terrific. I have yet to hear a single reporter ask a single Occupy Wall Street person a single rational question about the economy that would lead them to say for example who's going to pay for the park you're occupying if there's no businesses making a profit?

(Publisher's Note: Please don't forget about our Sollidarity Pizza funder)



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (279)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (936)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

After explaining all of the terrible things that would happen if the U.S. debt ceiling was not raised, CNBC's Jim Cramer said Sunday that all the "fear" and "panic" had actually been caused by President Barack Obama.

"Now we're talking about a recession," Cramer told NBC's David Gregory. "We will be in recession if this is not resolved. Recession means many fewer jobs, means far fewer tax receipts, trillion dollars lost -- IRA, 401K -- trillion dollars lost in job creation. I'm hearing about little amounts being saved here versus what will be lost in the next six months if this is not resolved."

"I'm tired of hearing all the media talking about how this is a crisis," Rep. Raul Labrador (R-ID) replied. "We will solve this problem."

"I want to talk about what the congressman said about the media exasperated or even caused the problem," Cramer complained. "We were all hopeful in Wall Street and in Main Street that the president would come out and say a few things that said compromise."

"He came out and panicked the heck out us. He talked about the higher interest rates for mortgages. He talked about the spiking credit card. He talked about how hard it's going to be to get student loans. He took us all aback because we felt he would be a compromise leader. Instead, he created tremendous fear. Tremendous fear means uncertainty. Uncertainty means no spending. Uncertainty means no spending by business. Uncertainty means to hiring. It was a setback. He caused the panic, not the media."



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (1351)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (3823)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

MSNBC's Morning Joe co-host Mika Brzezinski accused former Mayor Rudy Giuliani of coming on the show to "vomit out complete baseless lies" Monday.

Appearing on the show last Thursday, Giuliani said that the Obama administration had not talked with oil industry experts about how to stop the leaking well.

"Two days ago I had dinner in Houston, with several people who are top people in the industry. [The Obama administration] never reached out. Never, never asked, 'Gee, has Shell done this before? Has Exxon done this before?' If your father or mother was sick, you would go get a second opinion from an expert doctor. Not from an academician which is what he did. Go ask the question. Anybody does remediation before or better than BP? Bring them in. Make them your eyes and ears. Have them watching everything. Maybe they could have gotten the estimate right of the amount of oil coming out," said Giuliani.

"And people in the industry believe that [Obama] hasn't talked to the industry because they are bad guys," Giuliani continued.

Brzezinski accused the former mayor of taking "cheap shots" because he had "an axe to grind" with the Obama administration.

A viewer wrote in to the show Monday complaining about Brzezinski's criticism of Giuliani. "I think Mika should be given a small desktop lectern like the one Robert Gibbs uses for his daily White House briefing. Clearly, she deserves some recognition from the executive office for the unending enthusiasm to regurgitate every talking point they send her," wrote one viewer from North Carolina named Gary.

Brzezinski defended herself. "I'm glad that there is someone on the set asking questions when people come and vomit out complete baseless lies on our set," she quipped.



These F@#king Guys - Goldman Sachs

The Republicans respond to the Goldman Sachs fraud charges by announcing they'll filibuster any financial system regulation.


Indecision 2010 - The Re-Changening

From The Daily Show Jan. 20, 2010. Stewart nails it as usual.

STEWART: So there you go. Democrats have lost one special Senate election in our nation's 15th most populous state. Let me see if I can break this down for you in mathematical terms: there has been a two percent swing in the power differential for 50 percent of our legislative branch of government, which of course makes up 33 percent of the federal hierarchy, so it's... let's put it another way.

[...]

What the f*#ck? Two percent of 50 percent of thir-... oh right, I forgot! As the 41st member of the minority party, Brown will now be imbued with near limitless power over financial, military, and social policy, just as our founders had intended.

And so it is at ah... 11:04 fake Eastern standard time we at The Daily Show are gonna call it. Scott Brown is now apparently the 45th president of these United States Of America! Wooo! Yeah baby! Welcome. It has been a long incredibly grueling couple of days since we first heard of this man. And now he's in charge of everything.



CNBC's Cramer predicts "gigantic rally off a Coakley loss"

Via Media Matters--"Pelosi Politburo emasculation": CNBC's Cramer predicts "gigantic rally off a Coakley loss". Since this guy is wrong about everything I guess we can predict a blowout by Martha Coakley now, right?

Just for a little trip down memory lane, here's Jon Stewart taking him apart last March--Jon Stewart creams Jim Cramer on the Daily Show.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (1146)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (1655)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Chris Matthews and Jim Cramer praise President Obama, Ben Bernanke and Tim Geithner for saving us from another Great Depression while failing to note a number of things. One, what caused the financial collapse in the first place that resulted in the need to rescue it. Two, that we still don't know where all of our tax dollars went. And three, that the system is still not safe and as Simon Johnson just pointed out on Bill Moyers Journal, things could worse because the system has not been reformed.

Matthews: Well, I guess the big question I would have Jim is if you had to look say five, ten years from now, looking back to now with the clarity of history, does Barack Obama deserve credit for a) avoiding a second Great Depression as he came into office with a strong stimulus of almost two trillion dollars in fiscal stimulus, huge printing of money, the bailouts etc. and secondly has he really put us on the course to recovery from this recession?

Cramer: Alright, I think it’s a team effort. Chris, first of all Ben Bernanke was late, but really went into high gear and the transition from Bush to Obama was really saved by Bernanke’s actions. Second, Bernanke did a good thing, but also Tim Geithner did a good thing and you could argue well Tim Geithner’s totally Obama’s man. Geithner made everybody feel that the banking system was safe. Once we had the banking system safe we began to have the recovery. So Obama should get a lot of credit for that.

Matthews: Well you know when the politicians wag and the right wing goes after them as they do—that’s the way politics works—they say bailouts, bailouts, bailouts as if there’s something wrong with the guy. They say deficits, deficits, deficits as if there’s something wrong with the guy. But everything I studied on college and grad school was that you’ve got to do those things, both in terms of the sectors of the economy which were in trouble, the financial sectors, the auto industry and you had to do something with regard to the over all economy in terms of printing the money, monetary policy, fiscal policy. The very things he did are things you’re taught you have to do. Am I wrong?

Cramer: No! You’re totally right. I hear those people criticize and I think, did they ever read any history about what this country did wrong between 1929 and 1932? This was exactly—what these pundits are calling for is exactly what created a multi-year depression. No! I mean, Bernanke, Obama, Geithner…they got it right!

Matthews: Well, all you hear from on the right is like Terry Jeffrey’s my pal who sits there like from Human Events on the far right, they come on here as if all you had to do was laissez faire. Step back; let the invisible hand solve the problem. Say’s law is still in effect, everything’s going to clear—they actually say this crap… so loudly they must believe it or else they’re just desperate. But they do believe that doing nothing was the right answer. Just balance the budget.

Cramer: They’re dreamers. Look!

Matthews: Let business solve the problem.

Cramer: Here’s the hand. It wasn’t invisible. It was choking America. We are very lucky that these guys understood history. Now the reason why it’s easy to criticize Obama and why he doesn’t take any credit is we haven’t created any jobs yet Chris.

Matthews: Yeah.

Cramer: And that is bad.

Sadly being humiliated by Jon Stewart was not enough to keep Jim Cramer from ever appearing on my television set again. He was right back on the air pretending it didn't happen. I don't know why anyone would take this guy's advice about anything. Later in the segment he also said this when asked about where we were headed with unemployment.

I think we are at the peak or within .1 [of the peak]. We are not going to breach 10%. I have my neck on the line on that.

Oy.