Go Home

David Shuster

85 documents found in 0.001 seconds.

Happy Turkey Day!

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (127)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (685)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Happy Thanksgiving everyone! Here's a rerun of a little blast from the past for your amusement this turkey day -- Sarah Palin's turkey pardoning fiasco from back in 2009.

The best to you and yours from all of us at C&L. Have a great day!



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (327)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (2959)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Conservative Washington Post blogger Jennifer Rubin, who has a reputation for reflexively defending Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, falsely claimed on Sunday that President Barack Obama had not mentioned the attacks in Benghazi, Libya that killed four Americans in the same paragraph with the phrase "acts of terror."

During last week's second 2012 presidential debate, moderator Candy Crowley’s instant fact check had briefly stunned the GOP hopeful by undermining his claim that President Barack Obama had not initially referred to the recent attacks in Libya as “acts of terror" during his Rose Garden speech.

Speaking to CNN's Howard Kurtz on Sunday, Rubin said that Crowley "blew it" by correcting Romney.

"The substance of the question was not whether or not [Obama] said 'act of terror' or 'acts of terror,' but whether he specifically identified this attack as terrorism," Rubin opined. "He did not."

"In the last two paragraphs, he reviewed all of the acts of terrorism that we've gone through, and at the end he said, 'acts of terror' -- not in the same paragraph with Benghazi, never said Benghazi is a terrorist attack," she insisted. "For her to take sides -- and my interpretation may be wrong, I'll grant you that -- for her to take sides and intervene went well beyond [her duties as moderator]."

In fact, the president did refer to the attacks in Benghazi that left U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans dead in the same paragraph with the phrase "acts of terror," according to the official White House transcript:

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.

"I have no idea what you are talking about," Current TV's David Shuster told Rubin as he read Obama's words. "I'm reading from the transcript!"

"No, it wasn't that," Rubin said, shaking her head. "And by the way, I don't think this hurt Mitt Romney whatsoever. His campaign doesn't think it hurt Mitt Romney whatsoever. They're delighted to have this issue front and center."

"For you of all people to criticize Candy Crowley when she didn't get the precise language when everybody knew what the president was talking about," Shuster shot back. "I mean, it wasn't some sort of mistake like [you] suggesting the Norway attacks were some specific jihadist connection."

"He's the Joe Biden of Reliable Sources!" Rubin exclaimed, referring to a recent debate where Vice President Joe Biden interrupted Republican vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan.

Media Matters' Simon Maloy on Sunday questioned why Rubin was "so blatantly lying and mischaracterizing the president's words" when she had nearly a week to read the official transcript.

"The answer can be gleaned from a comment she made towards the end of the video above about the 'acts of terror' flap: 'I don't think this hurt Mitt Romney whatsoever. His campaign doesn't think it hurt Mitt Romney whatsoever.' That lock-step synchronicity with the Romney campaign crystallizes the broadly held opinion of Rubin's increasingly embarrassing work for the Washington Post," Maloy wrote.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (88)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (427)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Current TV correspondent David Shuster on Sunday joked that John Sununu "hasn't taken his medication" because the former New Hampshire governor told a CNN host to "put an Obama bumper sticker on your forehead."

During an interview on CNN last week, Sununu, who chairs presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s national steering committee, had lashed out a host Soledad O'Brien after she tried to fact check Republican claims about Rep. Paul Ryan’s (R-WI) plan to overhaul Medicare.

“Soledad, stop this!” Sununu shouted. “All you’re doing is mimicking the stuff that comes out of the White House and gets repeated on the Democratic blog boards out there.”

“I’m telling you what Factcheck.com tells you, I’m telling you what the CBO tells you, I’m telling you what CNN’s independent analysis says,” the CNN host explained.

“Put an Obama bumper sticker on your forehead when you do this!” the frustrated surrogate shot back.

On Sunday, CNN's Howard Kurtz noted that others in the Romney campaign and at Fox News had also accused the "liberal media" of covering Ryan unfairly.

"John Sununu seems like some who hasn't taken his medication and can't hear very well," Shuster quipped. "And if that's the message that the Romney campaign wants, if that's the kind of surrogate, keep putting him out there."

"I think the problem that a lot of journalists have had in trying to figure out where Romney's position is, is Mitt Romney," he continued. "Because on the one hand, one day he'll say, 'Oh yeah, I support the Paul Ryan budget.' On the next day, 'Well, I have my own plan for Medicare.' On the next day, 'But I support his budget plan.' And the next day, reporters say, 'What are the details?' [And Romney says,] 'Well, we're not going to tell you until after the election.'"



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (252)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (867)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Suspended Politico reporter Joe Williams on Monday accused conservative publications like the late Andrew Breitbart's Big Media and Tucker Carlson's The Daily Caller of acting like a "schoolyard bully" by deliberately targeting him after he said GOP hopeful Mitt Romney was more comfortable around "white folks."

Speaking out for the first time since Politico suspended him indefinitely, Williams told Current TV's Bill Press that Big Media used "selective evidence" from comments about Romney on MSNBC and his Twitter account because they were in the business of "gathering scalps" from the so-called liberal media.

"It became about me and not about what I said," he explained. "And that was something that was common to a lot of what you talked about earlier: Chris Hayes, David Shuster, the list goes on. And, you know, now my name is on that list. But the problem I see here is it's not going to stop there."

"Part of the issue here is the fact that we have an organization -- we have a couple of organizations that have very clear agendas," Williams continued. "They're funded -- we don't quite exactly know how, but, certainly, they get their money to do what they do. Their agenda is quite clear. Their agenda is to make enough noise, to push back hard enough that organizations -- independent organizations, independent news organizations that have foundations, that have credibility to their name -- fold."

"Basically it's the schoolyard bully concept where if you make enough noise, if you push back hard enough, people are not going to fight back. ... They're in the business of gathering scalps."

When it comes to the comments about Romney, Williams did not seem eager to apologize.

"If I apologize for that, there are going to be many other people who have to as well because this is not a new sentiment," he pointed out, noting that the phrase "white folks" had been like waving a red flag in front of bull. "To me in my personal opinion at this point, those two words were the ones that set people off. You know, 'white folks,' 'Mitt Romney.' It's a match to a tender keg to certain segments of people who decided they want to push back on what they believe is the liberal media."

Williams also wouldn't say if he wanted to stay on at Politico.

"That's a question that we're working on," he told Press.

The Daily Caller on Monday revealed a March 30 tweet where Williams had accused Politico of an "overlay of blatant racism," calling it the "secret sauce in the Politico shitburger."

"Certainly at that point I was venting, I was spouting, I had frustrations at work, there were frustrations in some of the things that I saw that was going on on the Politico landscape," he recalled. "And I vented and in error and I vented in a public place and that was a huge mistake."

"There are a lot of frustrations in Washington, a lot of things that have racist kind of aura," Williams added. "Politico, by and large, has a lot of things to deal with, questions as far as that's concerned. Well, [minority] representation. Diversity is a problem for the entire D.C. press corps and I don't think Politico is an exception in that regard."



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (322)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (662)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Keith Olbermann sat down with David Letterman this Tuesday to give his side of the not-entirely-unexpected firing from Current TV. I don't think Keith Olbermann did himself any favors with the $10 million chandelier reference, but he did give us a bit of insight into his take on everything from problems with the set, to his drivers not being paid for by the network, to why he had some problems appearing on the air and problems with losing his voice.

Obviously, Olbermann will present his side as contritely as possible that he tried to make it work, but he missed a whole lot of days besides the ones he addressed here. And I think it's a bit ridiculous to claim that he didn't know before he signed that Current had limited viewing access across the country and much lower budgets than the networks he had previously been on.

I regret the loss of both his MSNBC and Current TV shows, mainly because he was one of the few willing to speak out about the excesses of the Bush administration years ago and risk getting fired or publicly shamed. He did it anyway when we sorely needed not just Keith, but others speaking out in the same manner. This site was always very supportive of his show and he had been generous to us as well, even acknowledging C&L in one of his books.

That said, he was famous for being prickly and difficult to work with and work for. I'm not so sure how much of a chance he was willing to give Gore's network, nor how much Gore and the others there let him down with promises not kept of production standards and professionalism. It's sad that what looked to be another potential news network not governed by right wing corporate talking points is going through this sort of turmoil. Hearing about all of it aggravates me just as badly as when I found out about the problems with Air America.

Continue reading »



Shuster: 'The Republican Party Works for Fox News'

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (170)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (628)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Current TV correspondent David Shuster says that it should not be a surprise to Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum or anyone else that Fox News is "shilling" for former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney.

Last week, Santorum complained to Fox News host Brian Kilmeade that the conservative news network was in the tank for Romney.

“He has Fox News shilling for him every day,” the former Pennsylvania senator explained. “No offense, Brian, but I see it.”

Shuster told CNN's Howard Kurtz on Sunday that it only makes sense because "Mitt Romney is the Republican establishment candidate and... Fox News is the Republican establishment."

"It used to be that Fox News worked for the Republican Party," the Current TV correspondent observed. "Now the Republican Party works for Fox News."

"Fox News is convinced that Mitt Romney has a better chance at beating Barack Obama than Rick Santorum or Newt Gingrich," he added. "So, they decided, 'Look, Mitt Romney is going to be the guy and we think he's the one to make it the best competitive election.' And I think, therefore, the coverage naturally becomes more pro-Mitt Romney."

Daily Caller contributor Matt Lewis contended that there was "no conspiracy" because some of Romney's toughest interviews had come from Fox News anchors Bret Baier and Megyn Kelly.

"Fox folks are predisposed to favor Mitt Romney because -- I think David's right -- they tend to be establishment," he explained. "It's not a conspiracy."

In an interview on Thursday, Romney dismissed the idea that Fox News was backing his campaign.

"I don’t think you are shilling for anyone to tell you the truth," the candidate told Kilmeade.

“I think it’s, as you say, pretty fair and balanced,” Romney insisted. “The truth is you report it all and you give us a chance to respond. That’s all we can ask for.”



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (321)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (2437)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

David Shuster filling in for Keith Olbermann on Countdown this Wednesday evening spoke to comedian and Daily Show co-creator Lizz Winstead about the dust up with the Susan G. Komen foundation's decision to pull their funding from Planned Parenthood. Lizz has been out there doing terrific work trying to raise money for Planned Parenthood for some time now and she didn't mince any words when it came to her feelings on the recent assault on the group from the right.

WINSTEAD: Well, I think she said it herself when she was running for governor when she said, "I don't support the mission of Planned Parenthood." And the mission of Planned Parenthood is to provide affordable heath care for low-income women. And, if you don't support that mission, I really don't know how you can call yourself pro-life in the least.

And I think it's very suspect that, within the last year, this woman who was running for governor — who got Sarah Palin's endorsement, she was so conservative that she got the endorsement of Palin, — ran for Governor of Georgia the same year this legislation comes to be in Congress. And Susan Komen's new edict is "we can't support any organization that has legislation before Congress that's investigative."

Where are those dots? How do those connect? It does seem like — conservative person needed to put a piece of legislation in place so that Susan Komen could conveniently withhold their funding. It might sound tinfoil-hat-y. But I would like to, at least, know that there is not connection, or, if there is, I'd like to know that too.

Lizz has a new article in The Guardian with more you can read here -- By defunding Planned Parenthood, the Susan G Komen Foundation betrays women.

Full transcript below the fold.

Continue reading »



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (297)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (1564)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Countdown's David Shuster talked to The Guardian's Adam Gabbatt who broke this story of yet another Iraq War veteran being the victim of police brutality at the Occupy Oakland protests -- Occupy Oakland: second Iraq war veteran injured after police clashes:

Kayvan Sabehgi in intensive care with a lacerated spleen after protests in Oakland, a week after Scott Olsen was hurt. He says police beat him with batons

A second Iraq war veteran has suffered serious injuries after clashes between police and Occupy movement protesters in Oakland.

Kayvan Sabehgi, who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, is in intensive care with a lacerated spleen. He says he was beaten by police close to the Occupy Oakland camp, but despite suffering agonising pain, did not reach hospital until 18 hours later.

Sabehgi, 32, is the second Iraq war veteran to be hospitalised following involvement in Oakland protests. Another protester, Scott Olsen, suffered a fractured skull on 25 October.

On Wednesday night, police used teargas and non-lethal projectiles to drive back protesters following an attempt by the Occupy supporters to shut down the city of Oakland.

Sabehgi told the Guardian from hospital he was walking alone along 14th Street in central Oakland – away from the main area of clashes – when he was injured.

C&L's Occupy America has decided to start raising money to help pay for costs and other treatments Scott Olsen might need to aid in his recovery with Occupy America's Scott Olsen Solidarity Fund. As Michael Moore proclaimed the other day up in Oakland: "We are all Scott Olsen!"





Continue reading »



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (297)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (3971)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Current TV guest host David Shuster Sunday ripped the Fox News hosts who moderated last week's Republican presidential debate.

Shuster, who formerly worked for Fox News and MSNBC, told CNN's Howard Kurtz that Chris Wallace, Megyn Kelly and Bret Baier did ask a few tough questions, "but there were also some questions, Howard, that were, frankly, incredibly silly and stupid."

"For Megyn Kelly to suggest -- for her to ask Mitt Romney, 'Oh, are you going to call President Obama a socialist too?' or for Bret Baier to say, "Wait a second, you know, how are you going to turn this country around? Candidate, you have 30 seconds.' I mean, it is not that simple."

He added: "If you're going to have journalists as moderators, at least pick people who have experience covering politics. Brit Hume, Carl Cameron, there are folks at Fox News who bring a certain level of sophistication to their understanding of politics. And I think when Fox News goes to the Megyn Kellys, the Bret Baiers, people who don't have much experience, who haven't covered campaigns, the result is sometimes you have inane questions that come out and, frankly, waste everybody's time."



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (292)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (2263)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Sadly the latest news on Rupert Murdoch and his son James and the recent developments in the News of the World phone hacking scandal haven't gotten a lot of play recently in the United States, but David Shuster filling in for Keith Olbermann on Current TV gave it some coverage this Tuesday.

Shuster talked to former Nixon staffer and author John Dean and got his thoughts on the recent developments on the story and whether Rupert Murdoch will be held accountable for the actions taken by his company in light of these phone hackings. Dean seemed to think, and I agree with him, that his son James is probably not going to come out of this as well as his father and will probably be the one taking the fall for this as he's likely to be called back again to appear before the UK parliament, this time, under oath.

Here's the latest from The Guardian -- Phone hacking: News of the World reporter's letter reveals cover-up:

Disgraced royal correspondent Clive Goodman's letter says phone hacking was 'widely discussed' at NOTW meetings

Rupert Murdoch, James Murdoch and their former editor Andy Coulson all face embarrassing new allegations of dishonesty and cover-up after the publication of an explosive letter written by the News of the World's disgraced royal correspondent, Clive Goodman.

Continue reading »