Go Home

Nullification

2 documents found in 0 seconds.

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (126)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (668)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

A Texas state representative says that a bill banning the enforcement of any new gun control laws is constitutional because it would only prosecute police and other state officials.

Fox News guest host Peter Johnson Jr. on Monday asked state Rep. Steve Toth (R) why his bill to moot any new federal assault weapons ban would not violate the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which says that state laws are trumped by federal laws.

"This is not a nullification bill," Toth insisted. "We target a very specific portion of where the Obama administration's proposed legislation is infringing on our Second Amendment rights, and it only deals with those two things. For example, the size of a magazine and the type of weapon. We're very specific about it, and we're not going after federal officials. We're simply saying state officials within the state of Texas are are not allowed to violate our Second Amendment as it pertains to these two things."

"The way you eat an elephant is one bite at a time, and we're going to start first with state officials that are also dual -- a state official that acts both as a federal and state official," he added. "These are people that are county sheriffs and so on."

"Law enforcement officials in the state of Texas could be charged with a crime themselves if they enforced those federal provisions?" Johnson pressed.

"Correct," Toth agreed.

The Texas lawmaker argued that he had to act to protect law enforcement officials who had vowed not to enforce new gun control legislation because "they would be subject to prosecution" by the Justice Department.

"So, we had to protect them," he said.

A Public Policy Polling survey last month found that 49 percent of Texas voters supported a federal assault weapons ban, while 41 percent opposed it.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (186)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (693)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

As Rachel Maddow noted in this segment tonight, sadly 150 years after the start of the Civil War in the United States, we've got wingnut politicians in the South who are pushing nullification laws in their states and those themes are sadly still resonating in this day and age after... and potentially because of the election of our first black president.

It's a damn shame we've still got wingnut politicians whipping up these divisions in the South, but apparently 150 years later, we haven't come nearly as far as we should have with racial tensions in the United States and with politicians who are willing to take advantage of them.

From The Maddow Blog, here are some links on her segment tonight:

McDonnell's Confederate History Month proclamation irks civil rights leaders

House: nullify health reform

Citizens line up to urge 'nullifcation' of health reform law

Nullifcation backers eye next move on anti-health reform plan

Arizona bill on nullifying U.S. laws revived

The 10th Amendment Nullification Movement

This Act shall be known and may be cited as the "Georgia Food Freedom Act."

Lawmakers Seek to Exempt Guns, Coal from Federal Regulation

Kentucky threatens to give boot to federal EPA

Confederate currency on eBay

North Carolina RLC Representative Glen Bradley Says State Needs Alternative Currency

South Carolina Lawmaker Seeks to Ban Federal Currency

At Least 10 States Have Introduced Gold Coins-As-Currency Bills

Bogus coins, bullion seized in CdA focus of federal action

Health Care Law Has Wamp Hoping Against Secession Palin's secession flirtation