Fiscal Responsibility

You can view this video right here by getting the latest version of Flash Player!
DOWNLOADS: (960)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (7428)
Play WMV Play Quicktime

You all remember how the wingnuts exploded in joy at the news that Chicago had been denied its bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics. Rather typically, our RedState pal Erick Erickson crowed:

So much for improving America’s standing in the world, Barry O. Maybe now perhaps we can hope he will mature a bit on the issues of foreign affairs. But I doubt it.

Well, now their heads are exploding at the news that President Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Here's what Erickson tweeted in response:

EricksonTweet_ee485.JPG

(Via ThinkProgress.)

Then there was Fox News. As you can see from the video above, it was like Scanners on steroids on Fox & Friends this morning, with Brian Kilmeade noting that this was the third honoree whose name was not George W. Bush. (Maybe those Swedes' "pure genes" got the better of them, eh?)

Even Michael Steele and the Republican National Committee got into the act:

“The real question Americans are asking is, ‘What has President Obama actually accomplished?’ It is unfortunate that the president’s star power has outshined tireless advocates who have made real achievements working towards peace and human rights. One thing is certain – President Obama won’t be receiving any awards from Americans for job creation, fiscal responsibility, or backing up rhetoric with concrete action.”

Congratulations? Perish the thought!

Blue Texan at Firedoglake has a nice roundup from around the wingnutosphere.

Meanwhile, Media Matters has compiled a handy video of the early reaction:



You can view this video right here by getting the latest version of Flash Player!
DOWNLOADS: (1236)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (3153)
Play WMV Play Quicktime

Marsha Blackburn who never had a problem with George Bush's wars and spending at the Tea Bag 9/12 protest in Washington D.C. saying the protesters want some fiscal responsibility. That's rich. And they want their "country back". From who exactly Marsha? Their elected representatives, or from the black man they think was born in Kenya?

Gotta' love Fox for staying classy with the "Don't Barney Frank Me" sign they were showing while they were interviewing her.


Weekly Address: Calling for Fiscal Discipline

From the White House blog:

This week the President reiterates a theme that has been a hallmark of his career, namely that "old habits and stale thinking" will simply not help us solve the new and immense problems our country faces. Listing off several specific changes he intends to bring, he describes his guiding principle: "To help build a new foundation for the 21st century, we need to reform our government so that it is more efficient, more transparent, and more creative. That will demand new thinking and a new sense of responsibility for every dollar that is spent."

Transcript below the fold:

Continue reading »


DOWNLOAD (56)
WMV QuickTime
PLAY (92)
WMV QuickTime


You Tube

From the Cafferty File.

In the Republican response to President Obama’s speech last night, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal called the stimulus package “irresponsible”. He said it will grow government, increase taxes in the future and saddle future generations with debt.

“Who among us would ask our children for a loan, so we could spend money we do not have, on things we do not need? That is precisely what the Democrats in Congress just did,” said Jindal.

Interesting, after the last 8 years, it would seem that Republicans are hardly in a position to lecture anyone about fiscal responsibility. When President Bush took office in 2000, the national debt was about $5.7 trillion dollars, which after two wars and lots of other spending, is now approaching $11 trillion. President Bush ran up more debt for this country than all previous presidents combined.

Jindal acknowledged last night that in recent years, “our party got away from its principles.” No kidding.

Keep in mind, Jindal — who some see as a possible contender for his party’s presidential nominee in 2012 — is one of the Republican governors talking about rejecting stimulus funding for his state. Jindal says he plans to turn down $100 million because it would require his state to change its unemployment laws. I guess when you’re a wealthy state like Louisiana you don’t need no stinking stimulus money.

Here’s my question to you: Are the Republicans in any position to lecture President Obama on fiscal responsibility?

Continue reading »


DOWNLOAD (50)
WMV QuickTime
PLAY (88)
WMV QuickTime


You Tube

During a discussion on how the stimulus bill got passed where Chris Matthews wants to frame the discussion on whether there was a "win" or a "loss" for President Obama, Andrew Sullivan calls out the GOP for their hyprocrisy on when they're concerned about fiscal responsibility.

Matthews: The Republicans have taken a rather unusual position here. Well maybe not unusual but certainly a stark one Andrew. They're voting "No". That's a bet.

Sullivan: They're also saying "We are the party of fiscal conservatism". Now they managed....

Matthews: Since when though?

Sullivan: I think like ten minutes ago. I mean they spent for future debt of this country, they added thirty trillion dollars in a period of boom. We are now in the swiftest down turn in employment in decades and they're quibbling over something like four hundred billion dollars worth of spending. It doesn't make any sense. The hyprocrisy of these people, their ability to turn on a dime and not even acknowledge their own responsibility. If they hadn't spent the amount they spent in the last eight years we wouldn't have this crisis in the sense we'd have much more leeway to spend our way out a recession.

The one moment you don't want to be a fiscal conservative is when the global economy is headed down into a down draft. And yet that's the one moment these Republicans pick to allegedly stand up for their principles. It's insane I think and frankly all these news cycle spins, that's the old politics. The new politics is we're in a terrible economic crisis. Have we done enough to get ourselves out of it?


John Boehner Suddenly Cares About Fiscal Responsibility

DOWNLOAD (30)
WMV QuickTime
PLAY (61)
WMV QuickTime


You Tube

Bob Schieffer asks John Boehner whether they're likely to pass Obama's stimulus package and whether the rest of the TARP funds should be released. Of course after his years of concern about how Republicans have driven us into a financial ditch, Boehner is suddenly now all about fiscal responsibility. Even after admitting we've got some severe problems that need to be addressed quickly Boehner doesn't seem to have many real reservations about slowing the passing of the stimulus package down and uses his "Democrat" colleagues for cover.

Boehner: We need to do this quickly but we need to do it in a responsible way. Whether we can do it in a responsible way that quickly is unknown. Earlier this week I thought surely we could have it to the President's desk by the middle of February. [..] As I begin to hear comments from my Democrat colleagues in the House and Senate you know they're raising real questions. [..] ..we have a budget deficit that we need to be concerned about. And I think a lot of members of Congress on both sides of the aisle know that we can't borrow and spend our way to prosperity. That we can't bury our kids and their kids under a mountain of debt. And so, what is responsible?

Yeah. NOW he's worried about our deficit and the debt left to the next generation. I'm so glad to see that timely concern on your part Rep. Boehner. And of course first and foremost Boehner is concerned about keeping those tax cuts in place. Notice how he doesn't mention keeping the ones in place for the richest in the country but talks about working people and small businesses? He talks about Americans using tax breaks to invest. Right now most Americans are either afraid to invest (since they haven't cleaned up the regulatory mess and no one knows what's safe) or don't have any money to invest in the first place. He mentions people saving the money but that's not going to do much to stimulate the economy is it?

Boehner: I think that clearly the most important part is allowing American families and small businesses to keep more of what they earn. If we allow them to keep more of that they earn they're going to spend it. They're going to save it. They're going to invest it. All of which is good for the economy and it can begin immediately. We don't have to wait for some government program to work or some government check to show up. We can do it quickly. And so I think the bigger point here is what's going to be in the package.

He goes on to say that most Americans are a "little skeptical" about government spending. Well gee..why do you think that is? It couldn't be because the Republicans have been completely irresponsible with how they've spent our tax dollars could it?

And lastly Boehner is asked whether the other half of the TARP funds should be released or not.

Boehner: I don't think so. I voted for the economic rescue package. I clearly thought it was necessary. I certainly raised a lot of concerns over the last several months about how it was spent and the TARP board we set up in the legislation to oversee this came out with a report late last week highly critical of the Treasury Department and the way they've proceeded. And I think until there is a demonstrated need in our economy, a plan to address that need I think it would be irresponsible for Congress to release the additional money and I frankly think there are Democrats and Republicans alike who have great concerns about this.

I'm so glad you're willing to do the right thing and actually care that the TARP money is not wasted now that a Democrat is coming into office Rep. Boehner. We could have used a little bit of that while Bush was slipping provisions into the way the money would be allocated for the first half. As usual with everything you do IOKIARDI but if it's a Democrat in charge, you're all about oversight and fiscal responsiblity as are the rest of your cohorts.

Maybe if you'd shown a little more concern over doing one iota of oversight on how our tax dollars have been spent while Republicans were in charge we would not be in the mess we are now.