Another day, another reason not to trust BP to handle anything properly in the response to this disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. GRIFFIN: For 26 yea
July 1, 2010

Another day, another reason not to trust BP to handle anything properly in the response to this disaster in the Gulf of Mexico.

GRIFFIN: For 26 years, Jean Pascal was a lawyer for the Environmental Protection Agency, investigating and helping to prosecute some of the worst environmental polluters in the northwest, including oil companies in Alaska. The worst of the worst, she says, is British Petroleum.

You describe BP as a serial environmental criminal.

JEAN PASCAL, FORMER EPA LAWYER: I have.

GRIFFIN: You believe that?

PASCAL: I do.

GRIFFIN: BP has pled guilty to illegally discharging oil in Alaska and also faces a criminal complaint, alleging it violated clean air and water laws. Pascal retired earlier this year, so she is now free to speak out about a company she says repeatedly violates environmental laws.

PASCAL: From my perspective, BP has, for a long time, been a company that is interested in profits first and foremost. Safety and health and environment are subjugated to profit making. And I do not think that has changed.

GRIFFIN: In congressional hearings after the fatal explosion at BP's Texas refinery in 2005, lawmakers asked BP's then CEO, did workers warn about safety issues at the plant? He said they had not.

Then there were questions about whether they feared retaliation for speaking up.

Bottom line, after pressure from lawmakers, BP opened an independent ombudsman's office to manage and to hear the safety concerns of its workers. It's run by a former federal judge, just not here in Alaska.

It's a very small office, tucked away inside this office building here in Washington, D.C. But British Petroleum has been running this employee complaints program for several years.

The independent former judge who runs the unit refused to comment to CNN.

Michigan congressman Bart Stupak was one of those who pressured BP.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The entire reason that office came to fruition was because of safety.

REP. BART STUPAK: Was because of safety, yes, and safety concerns continue yet today.

GRIFFIN: Since the ombudsman's office opened, 112 BP workers have come forward to file reports, 35 of them deal with, quote, system integrity or safety issues and the ombudsman's office says they are extremely serious.

But "Keeping Them Honest," sources close to the ombudsman's office tells CNN BP doesn't like it, and its independent investigators and that it doesn't like employees reporting safety problems outside the company.

A union representative says some BP workers who complained have faced retaliation. Jean Pascal agrees.

PASCAL: Many of the employees who have actually reported safety, health, environmental and safety issues, particularly in Alaska, have been retaliated against. They've been demoted. They've been terminated, and they've also been blackballed.

GRIFFIN: A BP spokesman tells CNN the company has, quote, "a zero tolerance policy regarding retaliation." The company, he says, "is unaware of any unresolved cases that violate the policy."

And there's this. Not long after he took over as chairman of BP America, Lamar McKay met with Congressman Stupak.

STUPAK: One of the first things Mr. McKay said was, "I'm going to replace the ombudsman. I'm going to shut her down."

And we said, "What do you mean?" He wasn't even on the job but a few weeks and maybe a month or two. And he started wanting to shut down the ombudsman, and we encouraged him not to do so.

GRIFFIN: Doesn't it stun you that he would make that remark?

STUPAK: Yes, it did. We were shocked that they would even bring it up in like the first meeting and then in the second meeting we had with them.

The logic was, well, we'll make things better. Well, we don't see...

GRIFFIN: Their logic was "trust us"?

STUPAK: Trust us.

GRIFFIN: You don't?

STUPAK: No.

GRIFFIN: BP has said it can do a good job investigating complaints through an established internal system without the ombudsman's office.

I think at some point a reasonable person has to come to the conclusion that this is a company that has no intention of changing its mode of operation, that the dollar is going to be paramount and that the health, safety and safety of American workers and the American environment are a secondary or tertiary concern.

GRIFFIN: Before the Deepwater Horizon disaster, BP promised Stupak in writing, that its watchdog unit would be in place for at least another year. But a source inside the ombudsman's office tells CNN, "Frankly, I'm surprised we're still here."

Drew Griffin, CNN, Seattle.

Can you help us out?

For nearly 20 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

Discussion

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.
Mastodon