Read time: 2 minutes

West Virginia Paper's Anti-LGBT Column Wants Death For 'N*ggers, Spics, Kikes And Wops'

A newspaper in West Virginia is defending its decision to publish a reader's racist and homophobic comments, which called for "queers" to be put to death along with "n*ggers, spics, kikes and wops."
8 years ago by David

A newspaper in West Virginia is defending its decision to publish a reader's racist and homophobic comments, which called for "queers" to be put to death along with "n*ggers, spics, kikes and wops."

WCHS-TV reported on Wednesday that the Lincoln Journal had come under fire for printing a transcript of a reader's voice mail comments in the "Gripe and Gratitudes" section of the paper.

The reader referenced a recent report about how the Lincoln County Board of Education had terminated lesbian teacher Kelli Burns from her job at Guyan Valley Middle School teacher after she accused board officials of forcing students to write complaints that she had tried to "turn them gay."

"We were really glad to hear that School Board is getting rid of them queers," the voice mail said. "The next thing is we need to get rid of all the n****rs, the spics, the kikes and the wops."

"You know even them Catholics, they are wrong as baby eaters," the reader continued. "We need to clear them people out and have good, white, God fearing Christians and everybody else needs to be put to death for their abominations."

"We'll keep Lincoln County white and right. Thank you."

Some West Virginians told WCHS-TV that the column was offensive.

"That's not nice," Hamlin resident Melissa Rogers insisted. "I support the gays, and I'm not racist at all."

But other readers agreed with the bigoted opinion.

"I don't have to read it all, I already agree with that," Hamlin resident Leroy Ramey opined. "Get rid of them."

Lincoln Journal managing editor Sean O'Donoghue, who is a Roman Catholic, agreed that the comments were offensive, but said that he had no regrets about publishing them.

"We felt it was the right call to publish it, given the ongoing story we covered over the past three weeks," he expained.

Marshall University's School of Journalism interim dean Janet Dooley, however, said that the paper had crossed a line by printing the anonymous remarks because they amounted to hate speech.

"If you look at hate speech, it does hit several of the markers of hate speech, that it is directed at a particular group of people," Dooley told WCHS-TV. “It is not only offensive, but it goes beyond that to threaten certain groups of people.”

Can you help us out?

For 17 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

More C&L Coverage


New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team