Go Home

Habeas Corpus

4 documents found in 0 seconds.

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (374)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (4345)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell drew the ire of The Daily Show's Jon Stewart this Thursday evening after he decided to briefly join Sen. Rand Paul's thirteen hour filibuster of John Brennan's nomination to head the CIA. As Stewart rightfully pointed out, any of these members of Congress who sat silent during the Bush years pretty well forfeited their right to feign concern over the civil liberties of Americans now.

STEWART: Those other senators are recent additions to the Senate, so I don't mind them jumping into Paul's filibuster, but you don't get to jump in on the concern the executive branch might be trampling the Constitution train. If I remember correctly during the Bush torture, suspended habeas corpus, see if you can get the Attorney General to sign off wireless wiretapping while he's in a coma years, I believe your response to that was... yeah.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (1282)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (10261)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Well, this is something you don't see every day. Ralph Nader hosted this interview segment with Fox News' Judge Andrew Napolitano and discussed his book, Lies the Government Told You. I'm surprised the judge is going to be allowed on Fox after making the statements he did about Bush and Cheney during the interview.

Nader: What about the more serious violations of habeas corpus. You know after 9-11 Bush rounded up thousands of them, Americans, many of them Muslim Americans or Arabic Americans and they were thrown in jail without charges, they didn't have lawyers, some of them were pretty mistreated in New York City. You know they were all released eventually.

Napolitano: Correct.

Nader: Is that what you mean also about throwing people in jail without charges violating habeas corpus?

Napolitano: Well that is so obviously a violation of the natural law, the natural right to be brought before a neutral arbiter within moments of the government taking your freedom away from you. And the Constitution itself, as the Supreme Court in the Boumediene case pretty much said, wherever the government goes, the Constitution goes with it and wherever the Constitution goes are the rights of the Constitution as a guarantee and habeas corpus cannot be suspended by the president ever. It can only be suspended by the Congress in times of rebellion which in read Milligan says meaning rebellion of such magnitude that judges can't get into their court houses. That has not happened in American history.

So what President Bush did with the suspension of habeas corpus, with the whole concept of Guantanamo Bay, with the whole idea that he could avoid and evade federal laws, treaties, federal judges and the Constitution was blatantly unconstitutional and is some cases criminal.

Nader: What's the sanction for President Bush and Vice President Cheney?

Napolitano: There's been no sanction except what history will say about them.

Nader: What should be the sanctions?

Napolitano: They should have been indicted. They absolutely should have been indicted for torturing, for spying, for arresting without warrants. I'd like to say they should be indicted for lying but believe it or not, unless you're under oath, lying is not a crime. At least not an indictable crime. It's a moral crime.

Nader: So you think George W. Bush and Dick Cheney should even though they've left office, they haven't escaped the criminal laws, they should be indicted and prosecuted?

Napolitano: The evidence in this book and in others, our colleague the great Vincent Bugliosi has amassed an incredible amount of evidence. The purpose of this book was not to amass that evidence but I do discuss it, is overwhelming when you compare it to the level of evidence required for a normal indictment that George W. Bush as President and Dick Cheney as Vice President participated in criminal conspiracies to violate the federal law and the guaranteed civil liberties of hundreds, maybe thousands of human beings.

They go on to discuss how these crimes have gone on unpunished and how the practices have continued under Obama and that as long as our citizens are willing to accept government deception and as long as the Justice Department and the lawyers in this country are not going to pursue these cases in court it's never going to stop. It's a topic that our media is happy to help brush under the rug as well.

UPDATE: If you would like to watch the entire hour long interview from Book TV, C-SPAN has it available in their video library here.



The Colbert Report: Obama Denies Habeas Corpus

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (254)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (597)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

From The Colbert Report April 15, 2009.

Stephen Colbert takes President Obama to task for his decision to preserve the habeas corpus policy of the Bush administration at Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan.

Colbert: You see, the President is fighting a federal court's ruling that the detainees at Afghanistan's Bagram Air Force Base have the right to habeas corpus. That they have the right to challenge their detention. But he's just following the long-standing principle of American justice: guilty until proven forgotten about. That is essentially the same stance taken by George Bush with one important difference: Obama makes the kids like it.

Now I don't know why he's denying them habeas corpus. I can only assume the guys they've got detained over there did something really unforgiveable. Like remind Obama he was once a professor of Constitional law. That is cold.

Stephen Colbert is correct to criticize the President for this. We need to support the President when he's right and not act like the right wing did with Bush and their blind support of him no matter what, and call him out when he's wrong.



Obama Takes Bush Position On Habeas Corpus

April 13, 2009 MSNBC Rachel Maddow Show