Go Home

Franklin D. Roosevelt

4 documents found in 0 seconds.

The Daily Show: Vague Against the Machine

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (706)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (7578)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

The Daily Show's Jon Stewart took apart Mitt Romney's promises to both cut the budget deficit, lower taxes on everyone, increase military spending and somehow not raise taxes on the middle class, along with his running mate Paul Ryan -- the numbers guy -- and their complete unwillingness to give anyone any specifics about what they'd cut or what loopholes they would close.

After showing a clip of Ryan telling Chris Wallace that it "would take too long" to "go through all the math" that would supposedly prove their plan is "revenue neutral," Stewart offered them a little help in that regard.

STEWART: How about this? You're busy? Leave it with us. We'll look it over. Unless it's all... bullsh*t.

Stewart wrapped things up with a little reminder from one of our former presidents who was also "running at a time when we were recovering from a financial crisis and who was telling Americans about the need for the rich to sacrifice in order to help pay for social programs." The more things change, the more they stay the same.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (120)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (283)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Joe Scarborough seems to have a little problem understanding why people would be upset with Mitt Romney's great wealth and how much he pays in taxes, or at least he pretended to on this Monday's Morning Joe. Here's Scarborough doing his best to carry a little water for Mittens and downplay whether those things should be an issue in the general election.

SCARBOROUGH: John Heilemann, Americans didn’t care that Jack Kennedy was rich. They didn’t care that Roosevelt was rich. They didn’t even care that John Kerry was rich in ’04. People aren’t talking about that. But Mitt Romney has given the Obama team so many buzzwords, Swiss bank account, Cayman Islands, "I like firing people," 14 percent, "let the market bottom out"...

BRZEZINSKI: "I know what it's like to be unemployed."

SCARBOROUGH: ...pink slips, I know what it's like.. You could go on and on. He has set himself up for a November killing.

BRZEZINSKI: He's the 1 percent.

After John Heilemann noted that Romney's "painted himself as a combination of Gordon Gekko and Richie Rich" and that his refusal to release his tax returns is going to come back to haunt him, Scarborough came back with this.

SCARBOROUGH: I’m not trying to be argumentative, but I think it’s a fair question to ask. [...] Why would they care that Mitt Romney paid a 14.3 percent tax on his income when John Kerry paid a 13.1 percent tax on his income and he had more money than Mitt Romney?

Simple answer Joe. Because they weren't advocating for austerity and policies that would make the fact that we've got record income disparity in the United States worse while also pushing policies that would make their own taxes lower, like Mitt Romney is now.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (116)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (210)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Wolf Blitzer asked David Gergen for his perspective on Wall Street reform and apparently Gergen wants the American public to think that a series of booms and busts is normal.

BLITZER: Our senior political analyst David Gergen for some perspective.

David, can we now simply assume that there will be Wall Street reform?

GERGEN: I think so, Wolf. There are a couple of contentious issues still to resolve. Consumer protection and derivative, both very important. But this bipartisan agreement today will end the filibuster.

CNN has learned that Republican Senator Susan Collins will now vote to end the filibuster. I'm sure other Republicans will join her. That will really pave the way not only to a debate, but final passage of a bill, and the biggest -- the biggest reform of the financial industry since the Great Depression.

BLITZER: Can they clean up their act, if you will, and do the kinds of things that will prevent what happened a year and a half, two years ago?

GERGEN: That's a very important question. Nobody knows the answer, Wolf. What we do know, Hank Paulson when he was treasury secretary said we'll have disruptions in the financial markets about every four or five years. That's just the nature of capitalism. The question is are they now putting the safeguards in place to prevent the next disruption or the one after from turning into a great recession and throwing so many people out of work. The hopes are that they will and that they've done a lot of good things and this is a very dynamic, capitalistic system and things, you do have sort of these eruptions, periodically and you can't be absolutely certain, but the country backs us, Wolf. Notably some banks. We've learned now that Citigroup as well as UBS and Morgan Stanley backed these financial reform and most economists say that it will make us safer.

BLITZER: We are told, by the way, that the vote on the Senate floor to move forward and allow this debate to actually begin on the Senate floor will happen within the next hour. We'll of course, watch that closely, David. So the Obama administration and the Democrats get health care reform. They're probably going to get some sort of financial reform right now, but when you look towards November and the midterm elections, doesn't the economy and jobs, don't that really represent the top priorities that the Democrats need to make sure they don't do as bad as some expect?

GERGEN: Absolutely, on that issue, the jury is still out. We still have a very stubbornly high unemployment rate. We'll be watching those numbers very closely in the months ahead.

BLITZER: David Gergen will be watching with us every step of the way. David, thanks very much.

Sorry David, but there's someone who's not a Villager hack named Thom Hartmann who would disagree with you.

Continue reading »



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (609)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (680)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Rachel reminds us that all that's old is new again.

But we begin tonight with a dramatic day in D.C. Republican Congressman Joe Wilson of South Carolina officially reprimanded by the House of Representatives today for screaming, “You lie!” at President Obama as the president addressed a joint session of Congress nearly a week ago. By a vote of 240 to 179, the House passed a formal resolution of disapproval for Congressman Wilson‘s breach of decorum. Now, that‘s the mildest form of punishment the House can administer, and they did it not for what Congressman Wilson said to the president but for when and where he said it.

It was not a party line vote against Mr. Wilson. Five Republicans voted for the resolution. A dozen Democrats voted against it. And another five Democrats just voted present, including Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank, who said in advance of today‘s vote that, quote, “I think it is bad precedent to put us in charge of deciding whether people act like jerks.”

Beyond the disapproval vote against Congressman Wilson vote today in Congress, the political importance of this “You lie!” incident is probably more evident in the reaction to it outside the House chamber, where Joe Wilson is being hailed as a hero by a lot of the conservative movement right now. Congresswoman Michele Bachmann of Minnesota repeatedly telling a tea party crowd in Minnesota this past weekend, and I quote, “Thank God for Joe Wilson.”

Continue reading »