Go Home

Palestinians

5 documents found in 0 seconds.

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (521)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (7645)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

As I wrote in my post from the previous evening's show, I was pretty sure Jon Stewart would be following up his segment on Mitt Romney's disastrous visit to London with his debut in Israel. He didn't disappoint and went after him for his aide losing his temper with reporters in Poland as well.

Stewart then showed part of Mitt Romney's speech in Israel and thought he possibly managed to at least make it through that country without any headaches, and then he managed to insult both the Palestinian and the Jews with his "culture" remarks, which he's also now on his third flip flop on: Take Three: Mitt Romney Now Says He Stands By Palestinian ‘Culture’ Comments:

On Sunday, Mitt Romney boldly declared that Israel’s economic superiority over the Palestinians was due to its culture. On Tuesday morning, he dismissed any notion that he had even discussed Palestinian culture. On Tuesday night, Romney reversed himself yet again, in an op-ed entitled “Culture Does Matter.”

“During my recent trip to Israel, I had suggested that the choices a society makes about its culture play a role in creating prosperity, and that the significant disparity between Israeli and Palestinian living standards was powerfully influenced by it,” Romney wrote in the National Review. “In some quarters, that comment became the subject of controversy. But what exactly accounts for prosperity if not culture?”

Good grief, what a nightmare. The man can't even take a consistent stance on what he said within the matter of a few days, much less a few years.

Stewart finished his segment with Daily Show "reporter" Al Madrigal, and making a mockery of Romney's statements about the "cultural" difference between the Israelis and Palestinians, and what it's like for them to be living under Israeli occupation.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (302)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (190)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum says nuclear weapons in the Middle East is a "good thing" -- as long as Israel is the only country that has them.

An intrepid young reporter cornered the candidate at a restaurant in Iowa Friday and asked him about his call to assassinate scientists from Iran and other foreign countries.

"If they come from foreign countries, they will be seen as enemy combatants," Santorum explained.

"Would you like to see a nuclear free Middle East?" the reporter pressed.

"No!" Santorum exclaimed. "I think Israel having a nuclear weapon is a good thing. Even though Israel has never said they have one, it is widely believed that they do have one."

"But I think that's part of the problem why these other regimes [in the Middle East] want to have one," the reporter noted.

"No, it's not," Santorum disagreed. "No one believes Israel is going to attack any Arab country. I mean, it would be suicide to do so. ... That's not why Iran is developing a nuclear weapon. It's not for defensive purposes."

In 1967, Israel launched a surprise attack on the Egyptian Air Force, starting the the "Six Day War." Israel has always said the preemptive attack was defensive in nature.

The former Pennsylvania senator went on to opine that Palestinians did not deserve their own country for the same reason that the U.S. should not "give Texas back to Mexico."

"Bottom line is that is legitimately Israeli country," he insisted. "All the people that live in the West Bank are Israelis. They are not Palestinians. There is no Palestinian. This is Israeli land."

The reporter challenged Santorum's assertions by noting that the Palestinians are not accorded the same rights as Israeli citizens.

"They cannot use the same roads. They have to go through checkpoints. So, do you think they should have the same rights [as Israelis]?" he wondered.

"The people of Israel have passed laws based on the conduct of the people there," Santorum replied. "That's an unfortunate situation. I wish it wasn't occurring. It's one that was brought on by the people and the activity that they conducted."



Flotilla Debate: Glenn Greenwald vs Eliot Spitzer

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (618)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (2732)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Glenn Greenwald took on Dylan Ratigan fill-in Eliot Spitzer on MSNBC over Israel's raid on the flotilla and the Gaza blockade and frankly it was refreshing to see this sort of debate that is not all pro-Israel all the time on one of the cable news shows. Glenn has a bit more on this at Salon.

Talking about Israel with Eliot Spitzer on MSNBC:

I was just on MSNBC talking about Israel, the Gaza blockade and the flotilla attack with Eliot Spitzer, who was guest-hosting for Dylan Ratigan. It was a rather contentious discussion, though quite illustrative of how Israel is (and is not) typically discussed on American television, so I'm posting the whole 8-minute segment below. Two points: (1) before I was on, Spitzer had on an Israel-defending law professor, followed by Netanyahu's former Chief of Staff, and both of them (along with Spitzer) were spewing pure Israeli propaganda in uninterrupted and unchallenged fashion; at the end of Spitzer's discussions with them, he asked them to "stick around just in case," and once I was left, he brought at least one of them back on to respond to what I said without challenge; (2) literally 90 seconds before my segment was about to begin, the new cam and sound system I just acquired stopped working, forcing me to unplug everything and use only my laptop cam and mic, which caused the technical aspects to be less than ideal (though still perfectly workable).

Most of the interviews I've seen with him are worse than this one with that awful web cam of his, so I hope he's got something better if he's going to keep coming on television. It's hard to make your points if the viewers can't hear what the hell you're saying, but anyway, back to the subject at hand.

sluggahjells at Daily KOS made a few points about the interview that I agree with.

What makes this interview so important to watch is that it features a perspective that isn't common place on Israel in American television.

The ugly nature of the Netanyahu's Administration preference to keep the Gaza blockade going on and claim that the blockade is "To make the people of Gaza go on a diet" is really disturbing. And you'll never here what Greenwald said in a regular discussion about Israel here on our sad cable television news stations. Instead, you'll get the usual cautious dribble of support that preceded no matter how heinous the crimes that transpired under Israel's watch are.

Because sometimes the truth, especially in regards to international news in the Middle East, can be too much for the networks to bare. And that was certainly the case with TV's potential next network man in Spitzer, when he had to deal with a completely honest broker like Greenwald is.

The other thing Glenn pointed out is that Israel and the United States do not have the rest of the world with us on this one. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza is untenable and when you've got this coming out in reports the problem is not going away any time soon.

Turkish navy 'to back next convoy' following Gaza flotilla raid:

Israel is facing another potentially explosive confrontation at sea as pro-Palestinian activists sent two more boats to challenge its blockade of the Gaza Strip.

Turkey - one of Israel's closest Muslim allies until Monday's clash left several of citizens dead - was last night reported to be considering sending a naval escort for the boats.

This would arrive in the region at the end of the week, creating a potential flashpoint for a major clash between the nations.

Yesterday Turkish premier Tayyip Erdogan called for Israel to be punished for its attack on the flotilla on Monday and said 'nothing would ever be the same' in relations between the two allies.

'Israel's behaviour should definitely, definitely be punished. No one should try to test Turkey's patience,' he said. Read on...

As the media has reported -- President Obama treads lightly in Gaza crisis:

The Obama administration walked a fine line yesterday in response to Israel’s deadly raid on a flotilla trying to break the blockade of Gaza, urging Israeli leaders to let more aid into the beleaguered territory but refusing to criticize the U.S. ally.

President Obama telephoned Turkey’s prime minister to express his “deep condolences” for the deaths and injuries aboard a Turkish-flagged vessel and called for an impartial investigation. And Secretary of State Hillary Clinton expressed support for a U.N. Security Council statement that condemned the “acts” that cost the lives of nine pro-Palestinian activists off the Gaza coast.

The raid put Obama in a difficult position, caught between pressing Israel to ease harsh conditions in the Gaza Strip while at the same time supporting efforts to stop the smuggling of arms into Gaza that could be used to attack Israel. Read on...

Not a huge surprise there but as Jason noted, Israel really stepped in it this time and made it extremely hard for the United States to continue being a friend to Israel.

Democracy Now devoted most of their hour long program to covering the rest of the world's reaction of the attack on the flotilla. You won't see much of this in our corporate media that takes most of their talking points from the pro-Israeli lobbyists in the United States either. John King's been allowing Amy Goodman to come on his new show on CNN once in a while. I would guess he'll never allow her to come on and comment about this situation.

Global Condemnation of Israeli Armed Attack on Gaza-Bound Freedom Flotilla: At Least 10 Dead, Hundreds Remain in Detention

To compare and contrast the "news" coverage out there, here's propagandist Sean Hannity with Get-Off-My-Lawn-You-Kids Grandpa McCain complaining that President Obama hasn't done quite enough to suit them to kiss Israel's ass yet since of course the Israelis are never, ever wrong and the people living in squalor, the ones they're keeping confined to a third world slum they can't escape and those attempting to help them and draw attention to it, are never, ever right.

Israel has a right to make sure weapons aren't going into Gaza. They should not a have a right to do what they're doing to the general population of that country.

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (319)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (783)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed



Axelrod: Israeli settlement plan 'an insult'

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (168)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (253)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

The Obama administration isn't backing down in criticism of an Israeli plan to build 1600 new homes in East Jerusalem. Israel announced the plan just as Vice President Biden was visiting the country.

President Obama's chief political condemned the move Sunday. "This was an afront, it was an insult," David Axelrod told NBC's Tom Brokaw.

Fox News' Bill Kristol responded to Axelrod by defending the Israelis. "No one doubts this is part of Israel. This little apartment building is going to be part of Israel. No different from Palestinians building apartment buildings in Ramallah. It's ludicrous the it became a big issue," said Kristol.



From Democracy Now: UN Inquiry Finds Israel “Punished and Terrorized” Palestinian Civilians, Committed War Crimes During Gaza Assault

A United Nations fact-finding mission has found Israel “punished and terrorized” civilians in its three-week assault on Gaza earlier this year and cited strong evidence that Israeli forces committed “grave breaches” of the Geneva Conventions. More than 1,400 Palestinians—about a third of them women and children—were killed in the assault. We get analysis from author and Israel-Palestine scholar Norman Finkelstein.

Continue reading...