Go Home

John Ensign

42 documents found in 0 seconds.

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (116)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (1327)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

This is almost as pitiful as the ambulance chasing we're seeing continue today on the Anthony Weiner story now that he's going to resign. NBC News Deputy Political Director Mark Murray and MSNBC host Richard Lui both acknowledge the criticism their network and others have received for giving non-stop coverage of the Anthony Weiner scandal while mainly ignoring David Vitter and John Ensign's scandals. Rather than admit that it's because of our corporate media's golden rule, IOKIYAR, they blame it on the Democrats.

Their new excuse -- they had to cover it because the Republicans were pushing the story. And why did they ignore the Republican scandals? The Democrats didn't push those when they were going on. I'm sorry, but since when is that some kind of guideline for what your networks should consider "news" in the first place? Reince Priebus says that Weiner should resign, and that means your network has to cover it non-stop for weeks? And it's not true that the Democrats did not say anything about those other scandals. Your network, with the exception of Rachel Maddow, chose to primarily ignore them.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (1010)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (4337)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz accused Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus of hypocrisy Sunday after he called for the resignation of Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY), while remaining silent on the sex scandals of Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) and Sen. John Ensign (R-NV).

"What Reince is saying doesn't pass the straight-face test, from a chair of a party who none of its leaders called for Sen. Vitter, who actually broke the law, to resign, who is still serving office," Wasserman Schultz told NBC's David Gregory. "[Vitter] hired prostitutes and evaded the truth. Chairman Priebus was chairman when Sen. Ensign was also embroiled in unethical, unacceptable, and probably illegal conduct, and he did not call for Sen. Ensign to resign."

"Sen. Ensign resigned," Priebus insisted.

"But you never called for his resignation, so it's a double standard," Wasserman Schultz charged. "So, you only call for Democrats' resignation, but not for Republicans', okay."

For her part, the Democratic chairwoman called on Weiner to resign after he admitted sending lewd pictures to several women and lying about it.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (279)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (804)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

After being extremely disgusted by how things panned out with Rep. Anthony Weiner and his admission that he was actually sexting with women on line after being newly married for only a year or so, and after quite frankly being really tired of the media giving this wall to wall coverage, I think this segment by Maddow is one of the few things I watched among maybe one or two others that might be worth some conversation on the subject.

And that is, how does what happened with Anthony Weiner stack up with other sex scandals and does what happened with him amount to something that he should be pushed to resign over? I also think a bigger question should also be, why does the media ignore some stories and give others wall to wall coverage? Why hasn't the press been hounding Tom Coburn about his part in covering up for the Ensign affair and giving that scandal the same type of breathless coverage over the last few years?

What Maddow did not bring up in this segment which is also extremely regrettable is the sorry, sad tabloid nature of our press that loves to take after this type of story when it suits them, and ignore it when it suits them as well and the fact that most of our media seems completely incapable of chewing gum and walking at the same time and not doing one BREAKING NEWS!!! story tabloid nonsense story after another instead of reporting on things that matter, like the U.S. economy going to hell, the fact that we've got so many unemployed and nothing's being done about it, or that our politicians are currently playing an extremely dangerous game of chicken with whether they're going to raise our debt ceiling or not and what price the GOP is going to extract from the working class to get a vote on that issue.

It's hard to say whether Weiner will survive this or not because it's likely this story will grow more legs if more photos end up being published and even if our national press ignores it, which I doubt, the press in New York is not going to. I would like to see him come back from this if he makes things right with his wife and continues to fight for progressive causes, but he's not going to be able to do that in the same manner he was before in the national media, and that really is just a damned shame.

In this political climate where we have way too few being willing to go to the media and push back against some of the status quo on issues like whether Democrats went far enough on the health care bill and should have been pushing for a single payer system instead, and whether Republicans care if 9-11 responders are taken care of and other issues besides that which the Congressman has spoken out on, losing Anthony Weiner's voice on those matters in the media is not just a loss for him and his political career. It's a loss for the rest of us that care about those issues as well.

And I'm quite sure no one is happier about the events of this week than Clarence Thomas and his wife Ginni.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (360)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (2046)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

On Meet the Press, David Gregory asked serial adulterer Newt Gingrich if he was going to have any problems with social conservatives who have called him a hypocrite for carrying on his own affairs while going after Bill Clinton. And who does David Gregory decide to quote here? Senator Tom Coburn. The same Tom Coburn that just helped to negotiate bribes for now former Senator John Ensign, who may now be facing criminal charges for his behavior.

GREGORY: You look at the field that's starting to take shape on the Republican side -- and we'll put the, the current polling on the board -- Mike Huckabee is now not running. He was high up there. Donald Trump . You were there at 10 percent. And our latest poll still indicates that you've still got high negatives. There's still a high unfavorable rating. Some of that, Mr. Speaker, has to do with your own personal life , the fact that you've been married three times, you had extramarital affairs , one of -- during which the time that Republicans were pursuing President Clinton for impeachment that earned you the label of being a hypocrite.

And I wonder how you're going to deal with this, particularly when social conservatives , like Tom Coburn , senator from Oklahoma , has said the following about you. And I 'll put it up on the screen. This was from last summer. Senator Coburn "made it clear that he won't be on Newt Gingrich 's 2012 presidential bandwagon. " Gingrich 'is a super-smart man, but he doesn't know anything about commitment to marriage ,' he said of the thrice-married former House speaker . 'He's the last person I'd vote for, for president of the United States . His life indicates he does not have a commitment to the character traits necessary to be a great president.'"

Someone needs to tell David Gregory that his irony alert button is broken. That or he's desperate not to remind the viewers about the Ensign scandal at all.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (336)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (1562)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

I just have to ask, now that it looks like there's going to be a criminal investigation against John Ensign after the Senate ethics committee released their findings this week: When is that same panel going to investigate Tom Coburn further and take some action against him and his part in covering up the crimes committed by John Ensign?

Here's the entire segment from Maddow's show where she laid out the entire scandal better than I've seen anyone else in our corporate media do with all of the ugly details explained fully. If you've got almost twenty minutes to spare and want to know what our press has largely been ignoring for the last couple of years that should have had Ensign thrown out of the Senate some time ago IMO, Rachel did a great job of explaining it here.

And here's more from the HuffPo on Coburn's role in the cover-up -- Tom Coburn Helped Cover Up John Ensign Affair: Senate Ethics Report:

Sen. Tom Coburn played a more active role than previously known in the negotiations between ex-Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) and his former aide, Doug Hampton. The extent of the Oklahoma Republican's involvement is made clear in a report released Thursday by the Senate Ethics Committee that accuses the former senator of serious criminal violations. [...]

Coburn, a friend of Ensign’s who confronted him about the adultery, became involved as an intermediary in negotiations between Ensign and Doug Hampton. The former aide sought money from Ensign in spring 2009. Coburn negotiated the payment to Doug Hampton down from $8 million to about $2.8 million, according to the report.

The Oklahoma Republican's involvement in the cover-up of the affair could lead to uncomfortable questions for the senator and his party going forward. While Ensign left the Senate hastily last week, Coburn remains an active figure. [...]

Coburn denied that he served as a negotiator when he testified for the report, but acknowledged he spoke to Hampton’s attorney, Albregts, in May 2009. The Oklahoma Republican told the Ethics Committee that he was simply planning to pass along information to Ensign.

I'm sure he just thought it was the "good Christian thing to do" for his friend. Nothing to see here folks, so just move along now. This hypocrite needs to be investigated just like his buddy Ensign was, but given it took them almost two years to even go after Ensign and the Senate ethics committee's track record, I don't hold out much hope they'll hold Coburn accountable. And don't even get me started on the DOJ that was going to give Ensign a pass before this happened and the ethics panel referred the case back to them. Apparently the rule of law in this country only applies if you're a working-class stiff who's not politically connected.



Sen. John Ensign Resigns Amid Ethics Scandals

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (269)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (976)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Sen. John Ensign will finally resign from his seat in the Senate effective May 3. Lawrence O'Donnell said this is the kind of thing that generally happens after the Senate Ethics Committee lets them know they're going to recommend expulsion.

From The Hill -- Sen. Ensign to resign:

"It is with tremendous sadness that I officially hand over the Senate seat that I have held for eleven years," he said in a statement. "The turbulence of these last few years is greatly surpassed by the incredible privilege that I feel to have been entrusted to serve the people of Nevada. I can honestly say that being a United States senator has been the honor of my life."The senator plans to send his resignation letter to Vice President Biden on Friday.

Ensign is under a Senate Ethics Committee investigation over claims he violated ethics rules in the aftermath of an affair with Cynthia Hampton, the wife of former top aide Doug Hampton, whom he helped obtain a lucrative lobbying job.

He cited the investigation in his statement.

"I will not continue to subject my family, my constituents, or the Senate to any further rounds of investigation, depositions, drawn out proceedings, or especially public hearings. For my family and me, this continued personal cost is simply too great," he said.

The committee ramped up its investigation earlier this year, including hiring an outside counsel. The investigation would be dropped, however, if Ensign is no longer a member of the Senate.

The resignation announcement started speculation the committee was closing in the senator. [...]

Rep. Dean Heller (R-Nev.) has already announced he's running for Ensign's seat, and it's possible Republican Gov. Brian Sandoval would appoint him as Ensign's replacement.

If he's appointed, it would give Heller an advantage over Rep. Shelley Berkley (D-Nev.), his likely general election competition.

Berkley was heavily recruited by Democrats to run and is considered the strongest competition to Heller. She quickly won the backing of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.



New Rule: IOKIYAR

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (1707)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (19596)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Other than his tasteless joke about Ellen at the end of this, kudos to Bill Maher for reminding us of just how many Republicans like Newt Gingrich who's still pretending he wants to run for president are huge flaming hypocrites when it comes to having the audacity to tell Americans that they're still the party of "family values."



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (1482)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (2885)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Rachel Maddow slams the Republicans for making John Ensign their "ethics point man". Their hypocrisy meter is broken Rachel. They have absolutely no capacity to feel shame.

MADDOW: But, first, “One More Thing” about today‘s Senate hearings on Goldman Sachs. There was sort of an amazing moment that happened toward the beginning of today‘s marathon hearings. See if you can spot the irony in this particular line of questioning being pursued by this particular United States senator.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

ENSIGN: Do you think that the incentives that are set up in firms like Goldman Sachs are the proper incentives to have folks engage in ethical behavior?

SPARKS: Senator, I think Goldman Sachs works hard to engage in ethical behavior.

ENSIGN: I didn‘t say that. Do you think that those incentives are there that lead to ethical behavior?

(END VIDEO CLIP)

MADDOW: Imagine what it was like in the Republican cloakroom before this hearing. OK, who‘s really going to go after these guys for ethical behavior? Who‘s going to go after these guys on ethics?

John Ensign, you up for it? John Ensign currently under federal and Senate investigations on ethics charges related to shtooping your employee and your former staffer‘s wife - John Ensign, you want to be our ethics point man here? Hey, David Vitter, you want to see if there‘s a way to go after them on hookers?



This story just keeps getting worse and worse, doesn't it? Apparently not only were the members of the C Street House getting their rent subsidized, they were also using their interns for maid services. Why am I not surprised.

Apparently the members of C Street haven't been too happy with Rachel Maddow and her reporting and the attention it's getting them in some of their home town papers and have accused her of attacking their faith and making personal attacks on them.

Jeff Sharlet joined Rachel again to talk about just how luxurious their living quarters at the C Street house are and why their claims that their rent is not being subsidized are just downright false.

MADDOW: But no one‘s complaining about Jerry Moran‘s Bible studying. The complaint is about Jerry Moran‘s rent. About the evidence that he is an elected official, getting his rent subsidized, and he‘s not reporting that subsidy either as income to the IRS or as a gift, like he‘s supposed to to Congress.

It‘s not religion that is at issue here. It is ethics and money. And the threat that‘s at the root of all the rules about ethics and money, which, of course, is corruption. Bible study away, Congressman. Who‘s paying your rent?

In his own defense, Congressman Moran also tried to downplay his living circumstances, telling the “Capital-Journal,” quote, “I have a small bedroom and a bath I share with other people.” He also says his rent is market based, not subsidized, and he says he brought his own bed with him to C Street.

As to the merit of his claim that he is paying what anyone else living in a 12-bedroom, nine bathroom town house close to Capitol Hill with housekeeping services and meal services would pay—as to the merit of that claim, let‘s turn to someone who has actually been inside the house on C Street, Jeff Sharlet. He‘s author of “The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart o American Power.”

Jeff, it‘s nice to see you again. Thanks for joining us.

JEFF SHARLET: Hi, Rachel. Good to talk to you.

MADDOW: I assume that you haven‘t been, and I haven‘t been, neither of us have been in Representative Moran‘s bedroom. But from what you have been—what you‘ve seen and what you‘ve been able to report about the facilities at C Street, do you believe that he and these other members of Congress were really paying market based rent?

SHARLET: Oh, absolutely not. It‘s a beautiful place. And, in fact, you go in, there‘s—as you mentioned, there‘s maid service, there‘s a cook. They‘re hosting diplomatic meetings there. And, you know, they‘re not bringing in ambassadors from around the world to sit on Jerry Moran‘s box spring. It‘s a luxury place.

And the fact is, they know that. If you go back in 2002, Louis Sheldon, a Christian right leader, said, a lot of congressmen don‘t have $1,500 to pay for rent, so, C Street does that for them. For those who are members of the Fellowship, it provides this subsidized housing.

MADDOW: When we talked to Senator Coburn‘s office about this last week, his spokesman defended the C Street rent situation for Senator Coburn by saying, “He hasn‘t received subsidized rent. He pays more than $10,000 a year for a room and bathroom only.”

Now, $10,000 a year works out to like 830 bucks a month, which is still incredibly cheap for a room in a fancy town house with meals and housekeeping. But other people who lived at C Street or who live there now keep saying this, “It‘s just this room. I just have this one room there.” Is it your understanding that they have access to all the common space of this giant mansion, too?

SHARLET: Yes. There‘s a big, beautiful—big screen TV down in the main common space. There‘s a beautiful dining room which is used for hosting formal banquets. There‘s a lovely breakfast nook that is also sort of a conference room. There‘s a beautiful kitchen.

It‘s really a space that almost doubles as a conference center. And also doubles, frankly, as a hangout. For Washington Congressman Zach Wamp, a longtime resident said, this is the place to hang out, to talk policy, to watch sports. It‘s a great place.

I recently spoke to a young woman who—a young evangelical woman thought she was going to do an internship in Washington, found herself recruited into C Street and turning down sheets for John Ensign, and she said, it really sort of galled her that it wasn‘t just those congressmen.

It was also people like Oliver North hanging around, and she was expected to be at their beck and call.

MADDOW: And just to be clear, people who think they‘re getting sort of internships are the people who are providing essentially maid services at no cost to the members of Congress for maintaining these facilities that they live in.

Continue reading »



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (697)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (699)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Rachel Maddow responds to Tom Caller for this (warning, link goes to Tucker Carlson's Daily Caller) Coburn: Our goal is to be less emotional than Rachel Maddow:

Coburn used the example of an MSNBC anchor to make his point: “Look at Rachel Maddow. She comes at me on the basis of emotion. She demonizes me. I don’t want conservatives to win on the basis of emotion. If we lower ourselves to the level they operate on, we hurt ourselves and our arguments.”

As Rachel noted Coburn threatened to block all spending bills in the Senate that aren't paid for:

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) on Tuesday vowed to block all future spending bills in the Senate that aren’t fully “paid for” with cuts to other spending programs.

Coburn and other Republicans are already blocking a $9 billion bill to extend jobless benefits for 30 days that isn’t offset with other spending cuts. That impasse halted benefits to 200,000 unemployed people this week. Read on..

She went on to list all of the things that Sen. Coburn has had no problem allowing to pass through the Senate without being paid for such as the Bush tax cuts, more wars, the bank bailouts and he also voted against pay-go. Rachel also pointed to his on-going problems in the corruption scandal of John Ensign and the questions now being asked about his rent at the C-Street house.

Rachel Maddow thankfully has done some of the best reporting out there on Tom Coburn and his fellow C-Street members. His response was to call her an overly emotional woman. Nice. About what I'd expect from someone who has no problem using womens' uteruses for political gain.