Go Home

Tim Huelskamp

2 documents found in 0 seconds.

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (358)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (7547)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

I have to give CNN's Ali Velshi kudos here, because he did something we don't see often enough on our corporate media. He fact checked someone right on the air and called them out for not telling the truth during an interview. Then he followed up during the same program so the viewers who watched the interview would see it. I was glad to see that happen during his New Year's Ever interview with Rep. Tim Huelskamp.

He actually went a long way in making up for the terrible interview with Huelskamp's fellow wingnut Rep. Marsha Blackburn the previous evening, where he allowed her to filibuster him and rattle off way too many of her talking points unchecked. I still don't think it makes up for him having the Wall Street Journal hack Stephen Moore just about every stinking week on his weekend show, Your Money, without some liberal economists for balance.

Velshi laid into Huelskamp for pretending that raising taxes on those making over $250,000 a year is going to harm a large number of the small businesses out there and those so-called "job creators," and gave him some grief for the stats he was quoting as well.

Ali Velshi Tears Into GOP Congressman Over ‘Misleading Statistic’: ‘You’re On CNN Right Now’:

Huelskamp disputed Velshi’s claim and said that he had “seen research” that raising taxes would impact “41% of business income.” Velshi called him out on his language, saying “41% of business income is not 41% of business, that’s a very, very different and somewhat misleading statistic.” Again Velshi asked, “You understand the distinction, right?”

Velshi then proceeded to silence Huelskamp from speaking any further, saying, “Sir, you put out information to our viewers, you’re on CNN right now. I would like the information to be accurate.” Huelskamp fought to answer, and when he was asked by Velshi whether he wanted to stand by his information, he said, “That’s our best guess. We’re still working on that.”

“I think that’s a guess,” Velshi retorted.

According to Huelskamp, part of the difficulty in obtaining accurate information is that the Obama administration won’t tell his team anything. Velshi slammed him for this misstatement, saying, “We actually don’t have any difficulty getting that information, sir. We don’t need it from the administration, that information is public.”

The post at Mediaite did not take note of the fact that he followed up during the same hour and fact checked Huelskamp for the viewers who had just watched the interview. I say good for him for doing this. It's too bad that this is the exception and not the norm on every channel with any politician who comes on the air and lies to the viewers.

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (240)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (4164)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

VELSHI: Wolf, I just want to... I've been doing some research as I promised I would do in the conversation that we had with Congressman Tim Huelskamp, quoting what he said was a study by Montana State University. We're working our way through that study, but I'll tell you the facts that we have right now.

If businesses... if everybody who earned more than $250 thousand saw an increase in the top tax rate from 36 percent to 39.6 percent, that would be 3.5 percent of all small businesses. That would be 940,000 businesses. That's I think a number that the Congressman was quoting. So at $450,000, it is nowhere near the number that the Congressman was quoting.

But let's just be generous and say that it was that. Of that number, only a very small proportion are not hedge funds, partnerships, law firms, companies that don't employ a whole lot of other people. So the Congressman's facts are just incorrect on this. There is nowhere near a million businesses that will be affected by this increase of taxing people above $450,000.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (307)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (2990)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

MSNBC host Joe Scarborough on Friday lashed out at tea party-backed Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-KS) after he insisted that there was no "gun problem" in the United States because mass shootings and assault rifles were a "people problem."

In an appearance on MSNBC's Morning Joe, Huelskamp said that what "bothers me the most" about the slaughter of 20 children in Newtown was that people were using the tragedy to push a gun control agenda. The Kansas Republican insisted that violent videos games and mental illness were the real problems.

"But it is it time to look at assault weapons?" co-host Mika Brzezinski wondered.

"Will that solve the problem? I don't believe so," Huelskamp replied. "It's not a gun problem; it's a people problem."

"It's not a gun problem?" a shocked Scarborough interrupted. "So tell me, why do Americans need assault weapons? Why do they need these high-capacity clips? Why do they need a Bushmaster [AR-15 assault rifle]? Can you tell me why?"

"Well, you know what? There's been a lot of misleading statements, including those that are said right here," Huelskamp opined. "It's not a gun problem. There's a person doing that... But, gosh, let's step back. Let's not build on the tragedy in Connecticut and use that to push a political agenda."

Scarborough pointed out that Congress passed significant laws in response to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 and few Republicans complained that the tragedy had been politicized.

"Do you dare come on my show and say that I am using the slaughter of 20 little 6- and 7-year-old children -- I'm using them for political purposes?" Scarborough asked in an angry tone. "I am not going to let you say that I am -- quote -- politicizing."

The MSNBC host continued: "Maybe some of us just believe, Tim -- just believe we have to do whatever we can, whether it's looking at mental health, whether it's looking at a violent culture of video games and Hollywood movies, whether it's looking at the proliferation of these weapons, whether it's looking at what happened in Oregon, what happened in Colorado, what happened in Virginia, what happened in Connecticut, what continues happening, Congressman. So, we can't at least talk about guns without you questioning my integrity and saying saying that I'm using the death of 20 children to try to make life for my children a little bit safer? We can't even talk about it without you coming on this show and insulting me personally?"

"You're not even a politician any more, and I understand that," Huelskamp shot back. "You look around this town, you look at within 24 hours, folks running on and saying we need to change the laws when they don't even know the situation. All I'm saying is, let's spend a little time looking at that, but not to use the tragedy. Because as a very famous political strategist said, don't let any crisis go unused. And I do not want to politicize this."

"So, let me get this straight," Scarborough quipped. "So, you can come on this show and say what I've said by the way, that we've got to look at violent video games and we've got to look at a violent culture that Hollywood promotes, and that's not politicizing. But if we even bring up guns, that somehow that's politicizing the death of 20 children. Wow."