Rep. Pete King

You can view this video right here by getting the latest version of Flash Player!
DOWNLOADS: (84)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (402)
Play WMV Play Quicktime

While I definitely do not agree with Dylan Ratigan on a host of issues, the one thing I've found refreshing about his show is that the guests had better not come on there and start spouting mindless talking points without expecting to be challenged on them--because they will be if they do, and forcefully as Betsy McCaughey found out the hard way about a month ago. Rep. Pete King was no exception today. With some help from Chrystia Freeland, Ratigan calls out Rep. Pete King for distorting what's in the House health care bill.

King asked for everyone to come join the Tea Baggers "press conference" on Capitol hill today and trotted out the tired old line about being able to buy insurance across state lines as a cost saving measure and allowing people "the freedom to choose" their health insurance provider. He also said that 85% of people are happy with their insurance companies and that Pelosi's plan would "cancel every policy".

Ratigan pointed out that it is not true that people are happy with their insurance companies and that the GOP bill would not assure more choices. Freeland noted that allowing people to cross state lines to buy insurance would just mean a race to the bottom and companies going to the states with the least regulations and make it even harder with people with pre-existing conditions to get coverage.

King and the rest of the GOP have nothing but the same tired rhetoric to offer on what their idea of “reform” is. They’re more worried about getting the Tea Baggers whipped into a frenzy than anything that resembles legislating.



You can view this video right here by getting the latest version of Flash Player!
DOWNLOADS: (721)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (1575)
Play WMV Play Quicktime

Rep. Pete King does his best to fudge a few polls and claims that health care reform is not a major issue among the American people, and manages to get in a few Frank Luntz talking points while he's at it.

King: I think it's pretty clear that over the last month momentum has swung in our favor, but you know, we have to avoid too much hubris. We have to avoid I believe, going for the kill. What we have to do is make our case, try to make it cogently and effectively that the President has over reached, that he is attempting to totally reform, or change the health care system without really an idea of where he wants to take it.

I mean there are four, five different proposals out there and you know, this is not a major issue among the American people. The last poll showed 14% showed health care as being a major issue, yet, this can have a real impact on the American people, so that's why they feel, I think this is a metaphor for the President having gone too far too fast, and really not lived up to his campaign promises of governing from the center.

What we have to avoid, acting as if we won this battle. Right now the voters are turning somewhat against Barack Obama. It doesn't mean they're coming toward us. We have to play this, I believe, very effectively, but not be going for the kill. We're just laying out our plan and why we think the President's wrong.

Watson: Congressman, can we push you on that though? Because that's, I mean, when you just said is fairly provocative to say the least. The polls I've seen say that north of sixty percent of the voters think that this is an important issue that needs to be addressed and in fact, no less than a conservative stalwart Robert Bennett, the Senator from Utah says that Republicans among others are going to pay the price at the ballot box if there isn't major health care reform. He disagrees with President Obama on what it should look like, but he says that it is a must, and you say that this is not a critical issue? Are you saying that major health care legislation doesn't need to get passed this fall?

King: No, what I'm saying is when you ask the American people what's the most important issues to them, health care reform does not rank high. Now if you ask Americans, do they want health care reform, they would say yes, but then when you talk about what health care reform means, it's what I believe President Obama wants. I think there's approximately, maybe ten to fifteen million people who are not going to have health insurance under any circumstances. We should be focused on them. We should also be looking at issues like portability, where you can take your insurance from one company to another, where we would give subsidies to those who really can't afford it. We would allow small businesses to form consortia so they can get better rates on insurance policies, but not this over all government plan. I still believe we have the best health care system in the world. We can adjust it and modify it, but not radically change it the way the President wants to.


You can view this video right here by getting the latest version of Flash Player!
DOWNLOADS: (1040)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (2104)
Play WMV Play Quicktime

Pete King, the noxious Republican congressman from Long Island, made a video for Friends of Pete King for the Fourth of July commenting on "real heroes" and then launching into an attack on the media for covering Michael Jackson's death so assiduously:

King: Yesterday I marched in two Fourth of July parades in Wantagh and Massapequa Park. Today I was talking a walk through Wantagh, here at the American Legion Hall, the firehouse down the street, the fire memorial a few blocks from here. And it really reminded me of, you know, the great men and women who've sacrificed so much for our country -- people fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan today; cops, firefighters, teachers, none of whom really get much credit. And yet for the last, I don't know how long now, this lowlife Michael Jackson, his name, his face and picture is all over the newspapers, television, radio. It's all we hear about, is Michael Jackson.

And let's knock out the psycho-babble. This guy was a pervert, he was a child molester, ah, he was a pedophile, and to be giving this much coverage to him day in and day out, what does that say about us as a country?

I just think it's too -- we're too politically correct. No one wants to stand up and say we don't need Michael Jackson. He died, he had some talent, fine. But people are dying every day. There are men and women dying in Afghanistan. Let's give them the credit they deserve.

I really think the media has disgraced itself. I think there are too many people in public life who have made fools of themselves by talking about Michael Jackson as if he's some kind of hero.

There's nothing good about this guy. He may have been a a good singer, did some dancing. But the bottom line is would you let your child or grandchild be in the same room with Michael Jackson? What are we glorifying him for?

So anyway, let's take some time out to really look to the people that do make this a great country -- the men and women in the armed forces, police, firefighters, teachers who work in really rough neighborhoods, people who volunteer with dying cancer patients, people who work in AIDS clinics -- they're the ones we should be glorifying. Not some pervert like Michael Jackson.

Newsday contacted him to see if he had any second thoughts, and he was unrepentant:

"The bottom line is, he’s a pervert," King said. "He was endangering young children and all these people who say he's a great hero would never let their children or grandchildren near him."

Let's stipulate a couple of things: First, we don't disagree with the sentiment that the media ridiculously over-cover celebrity deaths like Jackson's. Our objection, though, is about the absurdities of the cult of celebrity, and not whether or not Jackson deserved the adulation.

(And it must be pointed out that the adulation heaped upon Jackson is largely the product of the free-enterprise system that Republicans like King vehemently defend at every nook and cranny -- except that belonging to a black man.)

Second, a lot people's recent distaste for Jackson does indeed revolve around the question of his bizarre relationships with children, and we wouldn't minimize those issues either insofar as there is any factual truth in them (nor, for that matter, have they been ignored in the media coverage).

But someone should point a couple of things out to King:

-- Jackson in fact was cleared of all charges relating to his supposed molestation of children. So there is no factual ground for claiming that he was a "pervert" or a "pedophile".

-- It's a fine thing to honor the men and women who perform the many tasks of public service he mentions. But you never honor these people by tearing other people down -- rather the opposite. Vilification of celebrities does nothing to glorify society's unrecognized heroes, and indeed is counter to the very reasons we honor them -- which is to recognize and appreciate the contributions of all hard-working Americans. Including even those who happen to be celebrities.

Finally, speaking of morally degraded people ... one wonders where Pete King's outrage was when it came to the people who created the Bush torture regime. Talk about skewed priorities.

I'm sure that King will be shocked to learn that Jackson fans are now organizing to fund his defeat at the polls.