The Fox News Sunday Panel Pans the Stimulus Package
By Heather Monday Oct 05, 2009 8:00am
Gee, who could have seen this one coming? I know, Paul Krugman.
Stimulus arithmetic (wonkish but important):
Bit by bit we’re getting information on the Obama stimulus plan, enough to start making back-of-the-envelope estimates of impact. The bottom line is this: we’re probably looking at a plan that will shave less than 2 percentage points off the average unemployment rate for the next two years, and possibly quite a lot less. This raises real concerns about whether the incoming administration is lowballing its plans in an attempt to get bipartisan consensus.
[....]
I see the following scenario: a weak stimulus plan, perhaps even weaker than what we’re talking about now, is crafted to win those extra GOP votes. The plan limits the rise in unemployment, but things are still pretty bad, with the rate peaking at something like 9 percent and coming down only slowly. And then Mitch McConnell says “See, government spending doesn’t work.”
Let’s hope I’ve got this wrong.
Looks like Paul was right. It's not Mitch McConnell but Kristol and Hume are basically saying the same thing. And for the record, since Bill Kristol seems to think that it was a terrible thing for the economy for the minimum wage to be increased, I'd like to see him try to live off of it for a year.
Transcript below the fold.
BAIER: Well, that was President Obama on Saturday. So was he hinting there that there could be a second economic stimulus package down the road?
We're back with our panel -- Brit, Mara, Bill and Juan.
Juan, unemployment at 9.8 percent -- do you think that one of the options that he's talking about is a second stimulus package?
WILLIAMS: Not in the short term, Bret. I think what he wants to do now is to try to make sure that, just as you heard him say the credit markets, the banks in specific are more open to doing work with small business, and small business being the engine for employment in the country.
If you look at Wall Street right now, Wall Street's doing pretty good. They didn't have a great week this week, but they're doing pretty much -- for the course of the year, they're on an upward trajectory.
You look at housing starts, it's looking better. You look at corporate mergers, the kind of confidence that would suggest that people are now willing to get back in and take some risks by merging -- that's another positive sign.
The big question has to do with the holidays coming and consumer confidence, and the idea that consumers are not going to spend, and if they don't spend, then small business doesn't hire, the retail outfits and the malls and the like.
And so what the president is saying -- what the White House people are thinking at the moment is let's get the banks to be more aggressive about reaching out to small business.
BAIER: Bill?
KRISTOL: I like it. I like it when liberals like Juan don't mention unemployment but suddenly are big fans of corporate mergers.
WILLIAMS: Hey, hey, hey.
KRISTOL: You know, that sounds -- the president said he's looking for additional options for job creation. He's done nothing for job creation. It's really stunning when step back and think about it.
What has this president proposed, what has Congress passed, that has anything to do with providing incentives for employers to hire instead of just for economic growth? There's been no pro-growth agenda, even though we're in a very steep recession.
And in fact, many of his pieces of legislation have been anti- growth. They increase the minimum wage. Guess what? Teenage jobs fell $300,000 in the -- 300,000 jobs have been lost, teenage jobs, in the last two months ever since that increase in the minimum wage went in, just as economists would predict.
They've got a huge health care plan out there which is a burden on business. They've got a huge cap and trade proposal which is a burden on business.
They did "Cash for Clunkers" which was reported Friday moved auto sales from September to August, and September sales were back as low as they have been all year. It is not a pro-growth administration. And guess what? They're not creating any economic growth.
BAIER: Mara, at 9.8 unemployment -- Alan Greenspan, former Fed chair, says he expects it to go above 10 and stay there for a while. That's a tough environment for somebody like Vice President Biden to continue to tout the stimulus package as working.
LIASSON: I think what -- the White House argument is that it would have been worse, and I think that you can say they might be right, but that's a very politically unsatisfying argument to make, it would have been worse without this.
I do think the president has said he also expects unemployment to go up, possibly above 10 percent. It is a very bad environment going into the 2010 elections.
However, I think when they talk about another stimulus package, they're not talking about one that looks like the first one, with a lot of massive spending. I think they're talking about extending unemployment insurance, some more...
HUME: That's a real job creator.
LIASSON: Well, they're talking about extending the safety net, maybe more tax credits. I cannot imagine that a second round of stimulus is going to be spending. It's going to be tax credits in a variety of forms, including for first-time home buyers. Maybe it would even be for hiring.
HUME: Boy, I certainly hope Mara is right and they don't try another stimulus like the one they did before, because in addition to not being much of a job creator, the very nature of it was such that it was not going to take effect, if it ever took any, for a long time.
And the normal course that's being -- running here, I think the recession will be seen as having ended by now when economists finally look back on this with full 20/20 hindsight, but it is very common in recessions for unemployment to continue to rise even after a recovery has begun. That what seems to be happening here.
The stimulus has done so far very little to stem that, if anything. And the nature of it is, and the size of it is such, and the amount of debt incurred is so great, that the stimulus now acts as a drag on the economy going forward.
So in addition to all the other problems with it, this thing -- the stimulus now is a burden on the economy instead of being a help to it.
BAIER: So...
HUME: And I -- I mean, my sense about it is that, you know, what we're seeing here is the chickens are coming home to roost on one of the worst things Congress has ever done.
BAIER: No political appetite for a second bite at that apple.
HUME: I hope not.






Login or Register to post comments.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't this stimulus plan drafted by the previous administration and congress?
you are thinking of the TARP bailout.
as a society. we really, really do.
Bill Kristol thinks Juam Williams is a liberal? Wow, just wow!
Is his sister named Womb Williams?
Bill Kristol thinks anyone slightly to the left of Genghis Khan is a liberal.
Bill's sister is named?
.
Genghis did try to "socialize" much of Asia and was quite tolerant of various religious views. Basically an extreme liberal from where Billy sits.
Death panels, idiot panels. SSDD
...are the die hard wing nuts anyway, so what difference does it make what they think about anything.
looks to Faux to determine how best to frame issues. Be prepared for the other networks to raise questions like, "Another stimulus package - bad for jobs?"
...in order to pummel Obama. Krugman must find it all humorous,if the implications of it all weren't so dire.
Krugman was correct when he said that the stimulus needed to be bigger. It is important that economists critique economic policies to make sure that they have maximum effectiveness.
Krugman did not state these facts so someone could later "pummel Obama." Krugman does not find it "humorous" for Obama to fail. He wanted Obama to succeed.
The panel on Fake News wasn't giving props to Krugman. They despised Krugman when he spoke these words months ago, and they despise him now.
Krugman was just accurately predicting the political fallout from a weak stimulus bill. Don't knock Krugman just because he was right.
When the other guys are trying to sabotage your country, it isn't wise to take their advice.
if we referred to it as a "Democratic stimulus plan" instead of a "war?"
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091005/ts_afp/u...
The RW script is just so worn and tattered.
If they can't come up with something soon . . .
economic recovery that we need but that won't happen until we recover something that has gone missing in ourselves.
#1 STOP spending money developing weapons to fight enemies that dont exist.
#2 STOP spending money stirring up trouble in the Middle East and then spending MORE MONEY trying to stop it.
#3 START spending money on infrastructure, health care, education.
Oct 5 NY Times: The Politics of Spite
And a related thought:
If the Russians Did This to Us, We’d Kill ‘Em
Since when are corporate mergers a positive sign? Mergers mean fewer businesses in industries that are almost already full oligopolies, leading from oligopolies to monopolies. Everyone loses right now when we have oligopolies, but we will really lose when there are true monopolies. I was just shocked by that ridiculous logic.
If the stimulus has not "worked" according to these folks, I would like for them to at least add something constructive, like offering what they think would work (offering tax cuts does not count).
specious bullshit. After having read that I think I'm less intelligent than I was before I read it.
Kristol thinks the fact that teenagers can't get jobs is the ultimate tragedy? How many of those teenagers live on their own and support themselves? I notice he didn't cite any figures concerning how many heads of households are having trouble finding work.
I also liked how he turns what Williams says regarding mergers, which was actually an observation and turn it into Williams being in favor of mergers. And then, Williams, being the toady that he is just chuckles.
Never an honest discussion of how we really actually arrived at this economically disastrous point. These dishonest hacks are why I don't watch any television, it's truly a waste of time for anyone that bothers to actually pay attention to what's transpired in our country and the world.
But there are little facts at all in this exchange. It is all normative claims. I think that is the problem I have the most with TV news and MSM news in general -- they generally have two positive claims and the rest of the time is spent spewing a myriad of normative claims. News should be 90% just the facts, positive claims, and possibly 10% opinion, not the other way around.
On Williams, is he even a liberal though? I like how they have him on and say, "Looky here! Our token liberal even agrees with this," as if Williams is the poster child of liberals.
Umpire to Faux News pack of whiny wimps:
"Swing and a miss, strike one, two and three."
...about as exciting as a worn-out shoe.
I see a pair of my old shoes and am reminded of how comfortable they were and of all the good times I had in them. I don't think Brit has those redeeming values.
"Stimulus" is going to all the wrong places - it should of been used for some long term infrastructure build/refurbish that the country sorely needs. Then it would of actually provided jobs and you could of received a multiplier effect - i.e. someone with a job buys extra things in stores, which employs extra retail workers, and so on and so forth.
It is pretty sad when France is beating us at stimulus, not to mention china.
http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/2009/07/nyt-f...
How could we even have an honest debate in this nation about fiscal stimulus when the majority of our citizens and of those in power think macroeconomics is socialism and socialism is evil? At times, I am even surprised that we got the stimulus package that we did, as weak as it was. I am sure that today even if we had an FDR-style president, we wouldn't be able to get FDR-style policies. Could you imagine Glen Beck or Rush Limbaugh discussing WPA-style programs? We need these WPA-style programs right now not tax cuts or breaks which made up the majority of the current stimulus. Even Milton Friedman was an advocate for fiscal stimulus when monetary policy failed. However, our nation is ignorant and our MSM perpetuates that ignorance.
I do agree with you that any stimulus should focus on the long term. This could be a great opportunity for the US to actually build some high speed rail (SF to LA would be a great start), to convert from a petrol based economy to one that relies on wind, solar, geo-thermal, and tidal energy, to provide the opportunity for every person to be able to attend a public university gratis, and to make universal healthcare a reality, just to name a few things. We could do it right now if we just decided that what is really important is the American public and the future of our nation instead of war, oil, and profits. But, when is that going to happen?
Izzat why I hear a buzzing sound?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5JALwwaASg
Yup! Leave it to the FAUX IDIOT Noise Nit Wit net work, If I am not mistaken the Stimulus was done on the TALKING MONKEYS watch, you remember the SOCIALIST Right Wing Morons that put this package into the WORKS prior to abandoning the SHIP and becoming the full blown IDIOT SOCIALIST Party of NO.
These Anti American Scum seem to forget it was on their watch it was THEY who deregulated everything it was the SOCIALIST Right Wing Communist Party that tried to hide this from the American People, now you Scum Bags using your Idiot Misinformed Noise Nit Wit Net Work to try and pin this on this administration, come on go suck a Lobbyist Dick because that is all you pieces of shit can do.
I was going to cite during the Sunday Morning thread Kristol's suggestion that "the increase in the minimum wage has costs jobs" (maybe I did?), but I didn't want to get into a debate here over the issue.
Instead, I sent a "tip" to ThinkProgress asking them for a critical analysis. I hope they do.
I guess the problem is that the top 1% are not making enough money. They should have their taxes totally exempt so they will, out of the kindness of their hearts, put a few people to work. Yes that's the ticket! Transfer all of the wealth to the few at the top and they will makeup some jobs for the rest of us poor folk to do. If trickle down economics didn't work worth crap for the last 30 years because not enough trickled up! I have yet to figure out how anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together believes this crap.
It's called "faith". These 'tards believe this crap the same way they believe in their sky daddy.
I actually heard a dude say that if people knew how much better the economy would do if we repealed SS, Medicare and welfare, they'd vote for GOPers in a second.
And he was serious.
Exactly what would make any thinking person believe that the uber-rich international elites plan on letting anyone who actually works for a living have one more dime?
Jeebus, GOPers are effin' stupid.
First I have to comment on the smiling smirkface bloody kristol and lurch have as they begin discussing the economy. That was a pretty good insight into just how "concerned" these right wing hacks are about a troubled economy.
But after that, the spin goes around in circles to where it makes little to NO logical sense whatsoever. Did lurch say that the stimulus bill that was passed put a great deal of stimulus to the future, and not THIS WEEK/MONTH/etc?? Then, he is bitching about no plans for the future. Put those two babbling statements next to each other and try to find any resemblence of logic.
That walking dead stiff broad on the panel makes a statement that the stimulus "probably" stopped the escalating unemployment numbers and it would have been MUCH WORSE without it. Listen to yourself you scrawny old bitch!
Finally...NONE of the panel talks about what it would be like WITHOUT this huge stimulus bill that was brought on by their monkey friend and his bunch of bimbos for the last eight years. This problem ALL started on January 20Th of this year, right?
Heartless bloody kristol thinks we should NOT have given the peons a minumum wage increase so the extra 300,000(?) young people that lost their jobs could all be sharing that increase of wage and they could dump another 300,000(?) into dividing the peons' pie.
What trite, ignorant and sadistic f*cktards these right wing hacks are. Am reading "Screwed", by Thom Hartman. I suppose I'm being indoctrinated (by facts), but they can only blame this demise of the middle class and the loss of jobs in our economy to their f*cked up reagonomics and the policies they have been spewing support for since the 1980's.
Just F*CK THEM! I really am insulted when listening to these clowns twist and turn facts into their little support machine for dragging this administration down to the place where dubya/darth and his inept idiots took us.
OH, and one little P.S. Are we so naive that we actually think big business, small business and BANKS want to see this administration succeed? Jesus...give me a break. Those are all the f*cktards that drove us down this muddy hill to the bottom where we are today.
Professor Brad Delong had a great piece about this, with excellent graphs showing just HOW BAD the employment picture will be going forward due to the undersized stimulus the GOPers pushed...
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/09/generat...
These loud mouth ignorant fools? What has any of them ever done?
None of them has ever created a job or done anything other then give bad advice and flat out lie!~
republicanism is a mental illness!
No matter how hard he tries to play the educated economic pundit, Shit Fumes will never, ever, approach the level of Paul Krugman. Fumes pontificates, he blathers and then belches out with his breathless, thought-provoking "I hope not"
GOP and FOX, united in "I hope not" and "Emphatically, NO!"
Login or Register to post comments.