Weekly Address: Efficiency and Innovation

From the White House blog:

With the process of going through the budget line by line in full swing, the President uses his Weekly Address to give some examples, big and small, of how the Administration is working to cut costs and eliminate waste. The President also announces two new key appointments, Jeffrey Zients as Chief Performance Officer and Aneesh Chopra as Chief Technology Officer, who will be invaluable in streamlining the way government functions through efficiency and innovation.

Full transcript below the fold.

It’s not news to say that we are living through challenging times: The worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. A credit crisis that has made that downturn worse. And a fiscal disaster that has accumulated over a period of years.

In the year 2000, we had projected budget surpluses in the trillions, and Washington appeared to be on the road to fiscal stability. Eight years later, when I walked in the door, the projected budget deficit for this year alone was $1.3 trillion. And in order to jumpstart our struggling economy, we were forced to make investments that added to that deficit through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

But as surely as our future depends on building a new energy economy, controlling health care costs and ensuring that our kids are once again the best educated in the world, it also depends on restoring a sense of responsibility and accountability to our federal budget. Without significant change to steer away from ever-expanding deficits and debt, we are on an unsustainable course.

So today, we simply cannot afford to perpetuate a system in Washington where politicians and bureaucrats make decisions behind closed doors, with little accountability for the consequences; where billions are squandered on programs that have outlived their usefulness, or exist solely because of the power of a lobbyist or interest group; and where outdated technology and information systems undermine efficiency, threaten our security, and fail to serve an engaged citizenry.

If we’re to going to rebuild our economy on a solid foundation, we need to change the way we do business in Washington. We need to restore the American people’s confidence in their government – that it is on their side, spending their money wisely, to meet their families’ needs.

That starts with the painstaking work of examining every program, every entitlement, every dollar of government spending and asking ourselves: Is this program really essential? Are taxpayers getting their money’s worth? Can we accomplish our goals more efficiently or effectively some other way?

It’s a process we have already begun, scouring our budget line by line for programs that don’t work so we can cut them to make room for ones that do. That means ending tax breaks for companies shipping jobs overseas; stopping the fraud and abuse in our Medicare program; and reforming our health care system to cut costs for families and businesses. It means strengthening whisteblower protections for government employees who step forward to report wasteful spending. And it means reinstating the pay-as-you-go rule that we followed during the 1990s – so if we want to spend, we’ll need to find somewhere else to cut.

And this Monday, at my first, full Cabinet meeting, I will ask all of my department and agency heads for specific proposals for cutting their budgets. Already, members of my Cabinet have begun to trim back unnecessary expenditures. Secretary Napolitano, for example, is ending consulting contracts to create new seals and logos that have cost the Department of Homeland Security $3 million since 2003. In the largest Department, Secretary Gates has launched an historic project to reform defense contracting procedures and eliminate hundreds of billions of dollars in wasteful spending and cost overruns. And I commend Senators McCain and Levin – a Republican and a Democrat – who have teamed up to lead this effort in Congress.

Finally, in the coming weeks, I will be announcing the elimination of dozens of government programs shown to be wasteful or ineffective. In this effort, there will be no sacred cows, and no pet projects. All across America, families are making hard choices, and it’s time their government did the same.

That is why I have assembled a team of management, technology, and budget experts to guide us in this work – leaders who will help us revamp government operations from top to bottom and ensure that the federal government is truly working for the American people.

I have named Jeffrey Zients, a leading CEO, management consultant and entrepreneur, to serve as Deputy Director for Management of the Office of Management and Budget and as the first ever Chief Performance Officer. Jeffrey will work to streamline processes, cut costs, and find best practices throughout our government.

Aneesh Chopra, who is currently the Secretary of Technology for Governor Kaine of Virginia, has agreed to serve as America’s Chief Technology Officer. In this role, Aneesh will promote technological innovation to help achieve our most urgent priorities – from creating jobs and reducing health care costs to keeping our nation secure.

Aneesh and Jeffrey will work closely with our Chief Information Officer, Vivek Kundra, who is responsible for setting technology policy across the government, and using technology to improve security, ensure transparency, and lower costs. The goal is to give all Americans a voice in their government and ensure that they know exactly how we’re spending their money – and can hold us accountable for the results.

None of this will be easy. Big change never is. But with the leadership of these individuals, I am confident that we can break our bad habits, put an end to the mismanagement that has plagued our government, and start living within our means again. That is how we will get our deficits under control and move from recovery to prosperity. And that is how we will give the American people the kind of government they expect and deserve – one that is efficient, accountable and fully worthy of their trust.

Thank you.



Login or Register to post comments.

20 comments

Efficiency. Fine as long as it's not worker drones who lack effectiveness.

Innovation. Fine as long as it's not some new "technology" gimmick to help us kill each other off faster and quicker and in greater numbers.

Please explain how you see efficiency to be much different from effectiveness.

Thanks.

The cuts to social programs to save money. Writing was on the wall. All to be fiscally responsible, of course, while bailing out the banks and Wall Street. It is spring and there is a smell in the air when you drive through the country. That smell sure isn't change.

of rotting wingnut corpses.

Show me.

By the way you just worded your last comment. You are nothing but negativity.
Really CC. Go back and read your own remark. And tell me that that is nothing but negative..
see ya.
ignore list for you .
Unfortunately, I have to put you there. Buh Bye.

Obama seems to be gathering enough goodwill around the world, who knows, maybe defense spending can go from HUGE to huge.

The savings would be better spent on domestic programs.

I'm sure that will piss off a ton of people here.
But, as long as he doesn't cut funding to those who really need it. I'm all for it.
A lot of people bashed Clinton for trying to cut out the abuse in medicare, welfare and the like. I'm all for it. Cut out the abuses.
Wow, I wonder what the GOPers will say to a leaner govt'?

IT'S SOCIALISM!!!

If they say it is.

First off, I believe Obama-san to be, probably the best representative of the modern U.S. and that the U.S. hardly deserves him, especially with posters who 'ignore' those who don't view their 'leaders' beneath halos. Cici, you guys aren't going to make it out of the hole you dug yourselves simply by being nice.
To place myself, I'm a Canadian who is located in Vietnam, currently living in Mui Tai. Ahh the spring time in South East Asia. (Hurricane season is alright for me.)
Second, you guys have to stop this tagging of others. Trust me, no amount of viewing the world through prism'ed 'onocuars will take away the damage you've done on a global scale.
Keep it real sisters,
trutheau

He put himself in that hole.
If I labeled him. It's because he earned it.

in the sand if you want to mudshark, and call me negative or ignore all those who you disagree with, but at the end of the day? You know I'm right.

The president praised Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Carl Levin, D-Mich., who are leading the effort in Congress.

"Earlier this week, President Obama said that we need to get serious about fiscal discipline by trimming waste in the federal budget," Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said in the GOP address. "Republicans couldn't agree more. We want to work with the president to get our financial house back in order."

What has Obama done where the Repukes agreed with him? Bank bailouts, they loved. Wall Street bailouts, they loved. Tax cuts, they loved. And now they love his new balance budget speeches. After borrowing and spending trillions?
Thought the motto was the only thing that could dig the US out of this economic collapse was government spending? Now they are going to cut back? Cut back where? Oh ya, military spending where they've actually increased? Or hey, maybe he'll increase taxes.

The sun don't shine CC.
Buh Bye

CC

I think what you are missing is the perceived notion that we have a great deal of waste in our budgets. The comment about $3m dollars being spent on seals is probably a perfect example of this.

As for spending to prop up the financial sector, and the stimulus package - I am not a big fan of the bailouts, but I am gullible enough to believe the "experts" that it was necessary. But I do not want them handing out bonuses, taking trips to LV, or spending the money on things unrelated to earning enough capital to pay us back.

The same thing is true with the Stimulus package, I have no problems tearing down schools and rebuilding something more consistent with providing a competitive advantage for our children (and our future). But I am not a big fan of building a bridge to nowhere. Both of these create jobs, but one is long term oriented and the other is not.

Do I agree that the defense budget is ripe for stripping? Yes, but with two wars still underway - now is not he time to cut those expenditures (these are bastards and they will let people die to protect their budget).

In conclusion, we need to spend money, but we need to spend it in a way that helps alleviate our issues long term.

You might not know that when Obama talks about waste, he actually means waste. Slightly different from the republican definition of waste = all non-defense sending.

"Secretary Napolitano, for example, is ending consulting contracts to create new seals and logos that have cost the Department of Homeland Security $3 million since 2003" -- since he's not as smart as me, it will take Obama a little time to realize that waste like this only adds up to 1% or so of the budget. He'll figure out that the budget won't balance like that and then and only then will we get to what you're worried about.

Obama will face the choice of cutting things that aren't waste, raising taxes on everyone, or raising taxes on the rich. If he makes the wrong choice, I'll attribute it to the fact that not a single human being of influence in the country is advocating the correct choice.

I couldn't imagine bush trying to give a speech like this, using two and three syllable words. It's so refreshing.

Should have brought the dog along

that he ends faith-based initiatives. Enough of the space ghost trilogy already!

And not a word about treasonous American corporations sending people's jobs to India -- which eventually come back since nearly all attempts fail, but by then it's a disaster for the nation.

20 comments

Login or Register to post comments.