Weekly Address: Financial Reform to Protect Consumers

From the White House blog:

The President explains his plan to address one of the major causes of the current economic crisis -- the breakdown of oversight leading to widespread abuses in the financial world. The new Consumer Financial Protection Agency will have the sole job of looking out for the financial interests of ordinary Americans by banning unfair practices and enforcing the rules. This is a cornerstone in America’s new economic foundation.

Transcript below the fold.

As we continue to recover from an historic economic crisis, it is clear to everyone that one of its major causes was a breakdown in oversight that led to widespread abuses in the financial system. An epidemic of irresponsibility took hold from Wall Street to Washington to Main Street. And the consequences have been disastrous. Millions of Americans have seen their life savings erode; families have been devastated by job losses; businesses large and small have closed their doors.

In response, this week, my administration proposed a set of major reforms to the rules that govern our financial system; to attack the causes of this crisis and to prevent future crises from taking place; to ensure that our markets can work fairly and freely for businesses and consumers alike.

We are going to promote markets that work for those who play by the rules. We’re going to stand up for a system in which fair dealing and honest competition are the only way to win. We’re going to level the playing field for consumers. And we’re going to have the kinds of rules that encourage innovations that make our economy stronger – not those that allow insiders to exploit its weaknesses for their own gain.

And one of the most important proposals is a new oversight agency called the Consumer Financial Protection Agency. It’s charged with just one job: looking out for the interests of ordinary Americans in the financial system. This is essential, for this crisis may have started on Wall Street. But its impacts have been felt by ordinary Americans who rely on credit cards, home loans, and other financial instruments.

It is true that this crisis was caused in part by Americans who took on too much debt and took out loans they simply could not afford. But there are also millions of Americans who signed contracts they did not always understand offered by lenders who did not always tell the truth. Today, folks signing up for a mortgage, student loan, or credit card face a bewildering array of incomprehensible options. Companies compete not by offering better products, but more complicated ones – with more fine print and hidden terms. It’s no coincidence that the lack of strong consumer protections led to abuses against consumers; the lack of rules to stop deceptive lending practices led to abuses against borrowers.

This new agency will have the responsibility to change that. It will have the power to set tough new rules so that companies compete by offering innovative products that consumers actually want – and actually understand. Those ridiculous contracts – pages of fine print that no one can figure out – will be a thing of the past. You’ll be able to compare products – with descriptions in plain language – to see what is best for you. The most unfair practices will be banned. The rules will be enforced.

Some argue that these changes – and the many others we’ve called for – go too far. And I welcome a debate about how we can make sure our regulations work for businesses and consumers. But what I will not accept – what I will vigorously oppose – are those who do not argue in good faith. Those who would defend the status quo at any cost. Those who put their narrow interests ahead of the interests of ordinary Americans. We’ve already begun to see special interests mobilizing against change.

That’s not surprising. That’s Washington.

For these are interests that have benefited from a system which allowed ordinary Americans to be exploited. These interests argue against reform even as millions of people are facing the consequences of this crisis in their own lives. These interests defend business-as-usual even though we know that it was business-as-usual that allowed this crisis to take place.

Well, the American people did not send me to Washington to give in to the special interests; the American people sent me to Washington to stand up for their interests. And while I’m not spoiling for a fight, I’m ready for one. The most important thing we can do to put this era of irresponsibility in the past is to take responsibility now. That is why my administration will accept no less than real and lasting change to the way business is done – on Wall Street and in Washington. We will do what is necessary to end this crisis – and we will do what it takes to prevent this kind of crisis from ever happening again.

Thank you.



Login or Register to post comments.

17 comments

Again, this one belongs on the front page.
Oh wait, Obama is doing nothing. nevermind.
Anyone who's watched how DC works knows that nothing gets accomplished overnight. Hey, I still think he's made mistakes.
But in the long run he'll go down as a great President.
As long as he keeps his zipper up. But then again, Michelle looks like she could beat the hell out of him.:)
just kidding.
People need to remember all the opposition he's encountering. From both parties.
Lets get rid of the blue dogs and Dino's in the next election and get better candidates. There is a risk though. By opening that door, some sneaky repugs might slither in.

And how about getting Al Franken seated. He's #60. And with the VP being the tie breaker, lets get this show on the road.

Oh, and Mr President, if your reading this, Single Payer Sir.

If it's good enough for govt' employees it's good enough for the people who pay them.

Financial institutions are nothing but a scam. To keep you in debt for the rest of your life. That way you have to work for wages that aren't enough. It's a structured scam.

And bailing our Wall Street by flushing good money after bad is protects consumers right. No, it’s saving capitalists at the expense of the rest of us.

Lets say that He didn't bail out any of these banks.
What do you think would be the result?
Would you be willing to accept and live with the results?
If it was your responsibility to fix this debacle, would you be willing to accept responsibility for doing nothing?
I mean you no ill will or disrespect Evet.
I'm just wondering what exactly would you do?

LOL

I see so many people bash him for bailing out these banks and such, yet I haven't seen anyone come up with a viable alternative as a suggestion.
Watch out they say the bottom has a rocky reputation.

I'll say it again. To get a good idea about what happened with the banks yoiu have to listen to This American Life "Another Frightening Show About the Economy"
and "The Giant Pool of Money"
and "The Watchmen"

I've bookmarked them for future reference.
I'll read them thoroughly soon.
But, I think the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act which is a repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, has alot to do with it. They made it legal for financial institutions to self regulate. And for banks and ins companies to merge and float very risky loans. Unsecured loans

So, what they did was legal. They made it so it was legal. Quite the hyst when you think about it.
Tons of money was made over all of this. They had to have known that this wasn't going to work. Shit, the last great depression proved that.
Of course these clowns think they know everything. And probably thought," I'll make it work, cause I'm better"
Or, they knew it wouldn't work and got everything they could while they could. Why else make it legal? Why else do it in the first place?
Let me put it this way, They're not worthy of trust.

All except 2 Repugs voted for this. One voted present( I forget which one) and the other didn't bother to vote on it at all. That was McCain.
I'll say this for him. It was a shrewd decision on his part.
All but 7 Dems voted for it . Barbara Boxer voted against it.
She's my gal. I don't always agree with her. But on this one I'm sure as hell glad she was smart enough to vote against the Gramm Bliley Act. WTF was wrong with the rest of them?
Like I said, Tons of money was made over this.

I know that there's alot more for me to learn about this. But sometimes it's just a bit too much.
But thanks for the links Cap't. I'll use them later.

Evet the wall Street bail outs are much more complicated than just bailing them out. I expect more from you.

"But what I will not accept – what I will vigorously oppose – are those who do not argue in good faith. Those who would defend the status quo at any cost. Those who put their narrow interests ahead of the interests of ordinary Americans. We’ve already begun to see special interests mobilizing against change.

He needs to say this to the blue dogs, Republicans and healthcare lobbyists standing against single payer health care reform and stick to his guns! People's interest in staying alive has been exploited for the rich and greedy for far too long!

...that the trillions and trillions of "bad/worthless derivatives" that we bailed out all the banks for...are somehow the fault of the average American homebuyer. (Yeah right...)

the financial mess we are in is the result of The Fed and all the congressmen on the banksters payroll who legalised financial fraud.

Americans are stupid Obama but we arent blind! (Bankers and politicians are responsible for the missing trillions... not the American homebuyer.

The totally ironic part of it all is that because of the repeated multibilliondollar bailouts and the continuing military budget, (thanks Obama) the U.S. govt itself is the biggest debtor in the world!

sounds more reassuringly intelligent than George W. Bush even as he retains many of the very worst aspects of the Bush regime.

As we see in his nomination of the smooth-talking torture-chief and “unconventional” warfare commander, Stanley McChrystal, to head up the Afghanistan-Pakistan surge, coming soon to a theater near you.

Guess I'm a Luddite now. Then again the mess he inherited . . we'll never mind.

copy/paste..."It is true that this crisis was caused in part by Americans who took on too much debt and took out loans they simply could not afford. But there are also millions of Americans who signed contracts they did not always understand offered by lenders who did not always tell the truth."

...and want everyone to notice that Obama blames three groups of people for this whole multi-trillion dollar mess...

1). "Americans w/ too much debt...
2). "Americans who signed contracts they did not always understand" 3). "lenders who did not always tell the truth"

WTF Obama???!!!! (at least you coulda thrown in a little responsibility on Bush) but instead you blame stupid poor Americans and our local banks!!!

P.S. Obama...If "borrowing beyond one's means" ...is a bad thing for the ecomommy ...then why did you borrow trillions from the Federal Reserve Corporation and lay it on the American taxpayer?

my suggestion for Obama is, we dont need a new Consumer Financial Protection Agency, we need to enforce the laws that are already on the books that deal with fraud.

If Obama really wants to help Americans he should have his attorney general start prosecuting wall street bankers and the private federal reserve corporation for outright fraud/deception and theft.

As buffoon Bill Maher says, the Dems are now the rightwing party of business. Any new laws brought forward will be nothing more than legal mumbo jumbo designed to give those lawyers more work. Protections for serfs? Ha! Banks already screwed the serfs and received trillions for doing it both from Bush and from Obama.

How about total lack of any meaningful oversight?

"Forgiving does not erase the bitter past. A healed memory is not a deleted memory. Instead, forgiving what we cannot forget creates a new way to remember. We change the memory of our past into a hope for our future."
-Lewis B. Smedes

PS.Smedes performed several years of pastoral service in the Christian Reformed Church.

“... we will do what it takes to prevent this kind of crisis from ever happening again.”

Seems to me that reinstatement of Glass-Steagall is necessary to prevent this from happening again. Glass-Steagall prevented investment banking from being merged with depositary institutions, resulting in the "too big to fail" financial corporation. Obama proposes regulation only. The CEO's of the too big to fail corporations testified that they didn't see the meltdown coming, yet, the über-regulator is going to see missteps for all the too big to fail corporations.

Now granted, this speech was given to address the consumer protection aspects of the meltdown only. But, the meltdown was not caused by Americans taking on too much debt, even in part. The duty to determine what debt can be carried is a joint process between borrower and lender, and it is the lender that should have the professionalism to make the determination.

But, the lender knew, in the case of the mortgages, that these mortgages would be bundled into securities, and falsely graded "AAA" by the rating agencies so that these securities could be sold for more than they were worth, defrauding the purchasers of these securities. They couldn't lend fast enough. If we had to limit the meltdown to a single cause, this is it, and it operated apparently with the comfort that no criminal prosecution would ensue, charging the perpetrators with conspiracy to defraud investors.

Right now, I've heard nothing that would cause me to believe that anything has been done so that "what it takes to prevent this kind of crisis from ever happening again" has happened.

17 comments

Login or Register to post comments.