Real Time: Bill Maher Mocks Malkin for Her New Book
By Heather Sunday Aug 02, 2009 8:30amYou can view this video right here by getting the latest version of Flash Player!
Bill Maher goes after Michelle Malkin for already writing a book trashing Obama's Presidency only six months in, and has a bit of fun with Jonah Goldberg, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter and Glenn Beck in the process.
BTW, Malkin is going to be a guest on This Week with George Stephanopoulos. Bravo George. At least the Maher's of the world are making a fool of you for giving the likes of Malkin another format to spew her venom.






Login or Register to post comments.
So how long did it take Michelle Malkin to write this book if she is already harping on President Obama six months in.
She had it ghosted
They're work real cheap
For door nails.
that ALL her stuff is ghosted. She's just the pretty face in front of her husband's words.
That's really no surprise, except for the pretty face part.
Another would be to use her own blog as source material.
... always the very first to cash in on a hate-fest.
Its the dumb fucks that will pay for that book and believe it to be gospel that you have to worry about.
is subjective. her whole demeanor makes what could be a decent looking lady look ugly.
whomever it is that she blew to get where she is now, and to get to write her stupid books must also have a good set of earplugs..
I don't care how physically attractive a woman is (and I don't think Malkin is), once she spews the venom that Malkin does, in my eyes, she is ugly as sin.
I think it's your mind."
-Frank Zappa
I agree. That's why I find Coulter and Palin hideously unattractive.
Maddow once joked on her show that she can't compete in any beauty contests. I think she's gorgeous.
The heart and mind are an important part of the package.
It was Thomas Frank (author of "What's the Matter with Kansas?" who noted that Michelle Malkin has the appearance of a Bratz doll and the soul of Chucky.
I don't know about that
http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00...
As blackened and ugly as her soul may be, she's still better looking than Jesse Malkin.
http://pics.livejournal.com/abcdefgh/pic/000f...
Just sayin'...
it's the ugly in the heart.
Alfred E. Neumann after walking into the door.
That is the funniest thing I have heard in a LONG time.
I'm a long-time MAD magazine reader.
It's where I learned the 10 Commandments.
Yeah.....that was hilarious! Bill's show Friday night was one of the better ones I've seen in awhile.
Wonder if the poop monster Beck saw that?
Zoiks!!!
Which one is Jesse?
call her a "pretty face" unless you meant that sarcastically. It seems every picture I see of her she has her face all screwed up and looks very ugly.
maybe to some, but I don't think so at all. Besides her attitude makes her one of the ugliest people on the planet IMHO. She's just such a nasty, hateful person, I would hate to go through life that way.
with the time it takes to go through publishing, review, editing, more review and more editing, printing, and distribution, she probably started writing it the day after the inauguration.
This book was in the works 6 months before Obama was elected, you know, just in case!
Screw the right wing, after 8 years of do-overs they now want to pass a speedy judgement. For no other reason then it's not a pasty white criminal draft-dodger/deserter duo in the white house and the repugs can't stand it.
My guess is she won't be spending eternity playing a harp.
I've been searching youtube and can't find her appearance (probably just me)
I know she goes "deer in the headlights" when she actually is questioned properly. I love watching Chris Mathews asking her to backup her statements about John Kerry. I would love to see her suffer on Maher's show.
Edit: I've found it was Season 2, Episode 13, just can't find any clips.
Youtube yanks waaaaay too much.
Good luck finding a Prince song.
There is a template for right wing books. You can buy the program at Amazon for pretty cheap money.
Hackery for Idiots.
For the last three chapters she just types repeatedly, "Screw Flanders."
XD
I like "Take me with You"
That was good. Cons really can't be mocked enough.
... for seven months on 9/11/01 and it still wasn't his fault.
Had the Bush regime not thrown out and ignored all things Clinton including the Clinton administration's Al-Queda strike warnings, and had Bush's lazy ass not taken the entire month of August off prior to 911, 911 may have been prevented.
But that wasn't Bush's fault, he was a national security success story!!
I think this book is giving way too much credit to Glen Beck, for one thing it assumes that he knows he's painting, I think the tital would be more honest if it was simply "smearing poo" (sorry for the gross visual) because that's all this nit-wit is doing, Glen doesn't have the brain power to know what he is actually doing, he just does it.
I thought she looked familiar:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJWdPn8iFKo
Wow, that was awful.
Wow Y, just wow.
You're welcome.
I love you, man!
Don't blow your wrad.
Holy. F*cking. Crap. instead!
Where's the short haired stocky lesbian child with a lab puppy and the gay boy in hot pants under the disco ball?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVAixkBXYMg&fe...
otherwise, they'dve been included.
that was awful. Simply the worst. You know HotAir or Malkin or whatever her website is called, has linked to this thread. I hope we can at least find common ground, and all agree, that was a steaming pile.
Oh and they can sign up and post flamebaitery here, but she does not have open commenting. She's actually afraid of REAL comments.
Glen Becks book should have been titled:
FINGER Painting with Poop.
But to a larger point, if I were to visit someone and they had several wingnut books displayed on a shelf, I would get the f%$k out of there ASAP.
and he lays them around when I'm coming over. I've started using them as coasters, and I make sure I get those glasses good and sweaty.
"Oh! I'm sorry. That was a book? I thought it was a coaster."
They could be toilet paper dispensers diguised as coasters?
The way the right wing turned a war hero (Kerry) into a coward and a coward (Bush) into a war hero is the same way they are trying to turn a failed presidency (Bush's) into successful one and a potentially successful presidency (Obama's) into a failure before it even gets off the grown.
Their schtick is old and tired and thinking America is on to by now. The 28 percenters who Malkin's trash book it targeted at to make her money can always be conned.
She had to get to work on her book on the end of his first term . . .
The early bird and all of that.
Just like her cheerleading abilities
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt_YcQlYxyY
...except being a war cheerleader. That she's pretty good at. I did wonder why she ran off at the end of the clip. [Deleted. Please don't post stuff like that on our site. Thank you-Sitemonitor] That or somebody asked her to sign up for combat duty. Snarky.
Our local public library gets all the new Coulter books and will probably have Malkin's. I have to buy and donate Hartman, Franken etc books to get them on the shelves. To their limited credit, they do put them on the shelves.
Where do you live, Oklahoma?
Nebraska
do with all the books that are bulk purchased to get those nutcase books on the bestseller lists.
Well, nobody wants to read them... and they're on the bestseller list now... so might as well donate them to the library.
When I was stationed at Edwards AFB I swear the base library had at least 5 copies of Mein Kampf, and a number of books on Satanism.
of raided meth labs in Yucca Valley and Twentynine Palms...
1978-1982?
OK, maybe their calling their single- and double-wides "estates" was a bit of a stretch,but...
Malkin on This Week just lied about the trumped up reason for Gates' arrest. She said he "obstructed police procedures". He was arrested for disorderly conduct.
He didn't "obstruct" anything. In fact, although Crowly wrote and reported that Gates was being "uncooperative", Crowly immediately had at hand Gates' positive I.D. and verification that he was the owner and resident of the house. How did Crowley establish that unless Gates "cooperated" in providing the information? What was Gates being "uncooperative" about if he had provided everything Crowley needed to establish no crime had been committed?
I just got from my Sunday morning bible lesson at Town Hall.com and you can get her shitty book there for free. Hmm.....it's so obvious how these books get to be best sellers. Right wing websites buy them up and give them away.
PS: Town Hall posters are batshit crazy, yet entertaining in their ignorance.
Maybe all the Republicanzi bat-shit crazies can get together, buy Alaska, and form a republicanzi nation up north where jebus was born... They would obviously be very happy surrounded by their kind, and the rest of us would be happy to be rid of them.
Heard the place is beautiful. Been to Texas. Move them all there. Not impressed,,, and they get back with village idiot.
...shitty show today...she even tried to legitimize the teabaggers. Lol. She was ignored and dismissed by the other panelists as a fool with an agenda.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEI2UUhVEn4
but the REALLY important segment was the one on C-Street -- america should be absolutely outraged!
so where's the segment, john?
C-Street activities are deplorable and the members are depraved.
as a knee-jerk response- like so many Repug doltheads who refuse to or cannot explicate in finer detail his/her argument, especially here in a venue where one's fundamental 'philosophy' is at odds with the majority view. (Would you be trolling about, by any chance?)
And I've no defense in pointing out your obscene infatuation for a higher-level worker in the political 'massage parlor' enterprise of paying lip service to her mighty and so-called 'conservative' overlords....Just my 'sad' attempt at annihilation (though you might spell-check your similarly 'original' comment)
Your 3rd paragraph= fearfully insane....as in bat-shit!
Lastly- Bill Maher is certainly on to something, at any rate....
You're floundering, indeed!
I don't know what he said because it was deleted, but I have something to say:
"Fat, drunk, and STUPID is no way to go through life, son."
I was about to post the youtube link earlier, but then decided I've been deleted enough today.
The book is probably on no book store shelves yet.
It may be only in those conservative book clubs where they inflate the sales figure by buying them in bulk and then selling them for a penny if you join the club.
Should we debate the points with people who just make their points up?
Is this your political mentor?:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7wYECUvLE0
I read it every year, and had to study it for four years in college.
Life, Liberty and Justice is just a rephrasing of the French's Life, Liberty and Property, and you cut it off because it follows, "...Without due process." The problem then and now is the clause is never fully defined.
The pursuit of happiness is that by definition it is individualistic.
And the elitist predominate on Wall Street, although their tentacles reach both parties, but primarily the one most sympathetic to their issues, the republicans. Hence the Wall Street bailout with no strings.
"Vie, Liberté, et Propriété."
Mon ami!!
Another point was the Founding Fathers were not monolithic in their thinking. There were Federalists and Anti-Federalists with their own books, those for a strong centralized federal power, and those for local power, those for and against the French Revolution, political parties were forming even during Washington days.
Wall Street as we know it wasn't until the Guilded Age of the Late 19th Century, not 18th.
So to say anything was of the Founding Fathers intent is a misnomer. They would try to agree on general principles as men of the Enlightenment, but varied in particulars. Jefferson managed to trip himself up by claiming the federal government couldn't buy land, and then turned around and bought the Louisianna purchase.
We all know how it works when Malkin publishes. She puts out a book of lies and distortion hoping no one will call her on it. When they do she puts out errata after errata. Malkin is one of the most literary dishonest people out there.
LOL,,, says it all
They are so devoid of any real thought that this is what they come up with, books claiming that Obama is a corrupt failure 6 months into his term. There is not enough grey matter floating around inside the empty skulls of the Malkans or coulters or Becks etc to even for 1/4th of a brain. These people are beyond stupid, they're not insane or really crazy, but they are beyond stupid hanging on a level of ignorance that I can’t even conceive of.
i don't think they are intellegent enough to go insane.
Who the eff would pay money for these frigging books? Unbelievable.
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/comment/p...
Marcellajoy said Townhall.com has them for free.
.
Until you and all the rest of your anti-progressive friends wake up to the reality of the world we are now living in, I'll forgo the pleasure of visiting the putrid sites you've suggested. Why do you hate America so much?
You can't blame him for negligence in letting 9/11 happen. He'd only been in office for eight months.
I guess that means not passing judgment on Obama until after mid-September, right? Same rules apply to everyone, right?
Not that I'd post there.
The Beck book was real :-)
I read through these comments to see if there were any good counter arguments to those made in Michelle's book, but all I see here are exclamations about how horrible it is that she wrote it, what an evil person she is, and how she spews venom.
If this is what passes for intelligent debate over here, I'd say you're all at about the moron level.
I'm reminded of befuddled adolescents not bright enough to say anything clever or pithy responding with, "OH, YEAH, WELL, WELL...FUCK YOU!"
Brilliant. You might convince more people to discount the book if instead of noting how quickly it was published and that it was written by someone you loathe, you also provide some actual refutation of the case she makes.
I'll check back in a few days to see how that's goin'.
reading Chomsky with an open mind? Can you even understand him?
What about Michael Moore. All you lot ever say is "fat." "He's fat." "He ate a lot hahaha." Al Franken. read his books? How about Michael Parenti? Read him? Robert Fisk? Katha Pollit? Alexander Cockburn? Jeffrey St. Clair? Vandana Shiva? Kathryn van den Heuvel? Patrick Cockburn?
Now I would be surprised if ANY of you have heard of these people, much less read any of their writings.
There has been long line of hot air fans coming over DEMANDING left leaning people read Malkin's book. I've got to ask why. Why should we? Is Mrs Malkin a scholar? No. We see her talk about how hate filled the left is and screwing up her face while she does so, while she advocates the incarceration of people based on their race. She has been proven to be the kind of person who is not hindered by facts disagreeing with her view.
The reason I personally won't read her book is because it is predicated on an unreasonable hatred. She's alleges to go after a culture of corruption, yet was totally for corruption, war, torture and anything the Bush Cheney regime got up to.
She'll bend facts and figures to fit her agenda, and I just don't have time for that. I don't have time to refute right wing lies all day long.
I read through those [malkin site] comments about this thread to see if there were any good arguments for her book, but all I see there are exclamations about how great it is that she wrote it, what an great person she is, and how the left spews venom.
I'm reminded of befuddled adolescents not bright enough to say anything clever or pithy responding with, "OH, YEAH, WELL, WELL...FUCK YOU!" too, when I read Michelle Malkin's posts, her by-approval-only commenters slavishly agreeing and hanging on her every word.
If that is what passes for intelligent debate over there, I'd say you're all at about the moron level.
Brilliant. You might convince more people to read the book if instead of trolling left wing sites telling intelligent people what stupid assholes they are, you were humping a book that was written by someone with a studious background on the subject, and someone who hadn't destroyed her own cred with hyperbolising, shrieking, lying and petty vindictiveness.
We ALL know Mrs Malkin won't even ALLOW left leaning posters to post over at her site. Your post, had it read the way I fixed it would have been deleted on her site and you would have been banned.
Lot of deletions in this thread. Guess we don't like Malkin.
they would never post that hate crap on her site, or they'd get banned.
Plus they think they are all that. "We'll just go over to C&L and call them names! We'll tell them what immature babies they are, then RUN AWAY!"
Nanook:
I'm sure a detailed counter argument for the book is forthcoming (like the premise that because Michelle grew up in Chicago, and Chicago is corrupt, ergo facto Michelle O is corrupt).
But the point that Mahar and all thinking people are making is that a mere 6 months into Obama's Presidency, a book has already been researched, written, edited, published and distributed proclaiming his administration as corrupt.
The problem with point-by-point countering of books by the likes Jonah Goldberg, Anne Coulter & anchor-baby Malkin is that by the time you've debunked one, their comrades have 3 more on the shelves. I think the maxim "A lie can travel halfway 'round the world before the truth has laced up its boots." is appropriate.
I mean there is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much bullshit that is important to debunk. Her old crappy book will be remaindered in a week or two.
At one point I was always amazed when the anti conservatives would would call conservatives haters. That was until Jr. became president and I listened to Air America. While we are all free to say what we want, for any left leaning person to berate a conservative for what they say is the ultimate of hypocrisy. I applaud those who wish to have a discussion on the issues. I am also quite certain that most who comment here have not read her book, including me. If I recall it didn't take the left long to vilify Jr.
A ghost writer? So what. Do any of you believe that Al Gore or the Clinton's wrote their books? Hate? Just read this blog starting at the top and there is nothing to go around.
With her other "works"?
Got your point Peabody. Yes, agreed. Only seven months have passed since inauguration, but the biographies and actions of the people Michelle writes about were not created in that short amount of time. Michelle didn't do any original investigative work to uncover these stories, they've been right out there for all to see waiting for anyone to do what Michelle did. Michelle only compiled them and makes the obvious point that what was promised to be the cleanest, most ethical administration in the history of democracy just ain't so.
Actually I prefer Wealth of Nations, Common Sense, Reflections of the Revolution in France, An Essay On the Principles of Populations, Enquiry Concerning Political Justice and its Influence on Modern Morals and Manners, Vindication of the Rights of Women, The Federalist Papers and the Anti-Federalist Papers.
Bill Maher reminds me of the class clown, standing out in front of the stoners behind the school, trying to make them laugh, by ridiculing the head of the debate team (who also happens to be homecoming queen). She rightly thinks he's an idiot, and won't give him the time of day. So he snidely mocks and jeers, and makes the stoners laugh. He doesn't go anywhere near the facts, because he'll get his butt kicked in that debate. Enjoy your smokes.
enjoy your delusion.
Obama...so easy to pre-judge!
she could have written about any administration in the last fifty years and done the same thing, expose all of the cronies and political hacks. if this were an honest piece of journalism she would have attacked the previous administration as well, but that wouldn't get her on fox news, would it?
Login or Register to post comments.