Rachel Maddow Show: Wendell Potter on the Health Care Industry Putting Soaring Profits Before People
Rachel Maddow talks to whistleblower Wendell Potter about the health care industry's rising profits while more and more Americans lose their health care insurance.
MADDOW: Are you by any chance a health insurance company executive? No? Me neither. And you and I, therefore, even though I know nothing else about you, you and I have one thing in common for sure. We are both in the wrong line of work.
SEC filings show that between the year 2000 and the year 2007, profit of the country‘s 10 largest health insurance companies rose 428 percent. In 2000, they had $2.4 billion in profit. By 2007, it was $12.9 billion.
Now, of course, this is America, we are capital C “Capitalists,” nobody begrudges anyone a ginormous profit, particularly if they‘re serving an important national need, like providing health insurance to the American people.
So, while the 10 biggest health insurance companies were seeing their profits rise over 400 percent between 2000 and 2007, how were they doing at serving that important national need? How were they doing at the whole providing health insurance to the American people thing? Eww! Apparently, while they quadrupled their profits between 2000 and 2007, the number of Americans without health insurance grew by 19 percent.
That seems bad. But not for everyone - also by 2007, the CEOs of the 10 largest health insurance companies were taking home an average compensation of $11.9 million each every year, while the number of Americans without health insurance for whom a burst appendix can mean bankruptcy has gone through the roof.
It was the insurance industry that bankrolled efforts to kill the last effort of health care reform in Bill Clinton‘s first term. And now, the industry says they‘re OK with reform of a sort. They just want to make sure that they don‘t get any competition from a non-profit government-run insurance plan that patients could opt into if they didn‘t like what the private sector was dishing out. You know, if I was a health insurance company executive, I‘m sure I would want that, too.
Joining us now is a former health insurance executive-turned-whistle blower, his name is Wendell Potter, and he was the head of public relations for CIGNA, one of the nation‘s largest insurers. He‘s now a senior fellow on health care at the Center for Media and Democracy.
Mr. Potter, thank you very much for joining us.
WENDELL POTTER, CIGNA FRM. HEAD OF PUBLIC RELATIONS: Thank you for the invitation.
MADDOW: The leader of America‘s Health Insurance Plans, the industry association, says that the health insurance industry is being unfairly blamed as the president and Congress try to reform the health care system.
Do you think it is unfair to single them out for blame?
POTTER: I think that she‘s doing what she‘s paid to do. I think that the health insurance industry deserves a great deal of the blame because they‘re very much behind the town hall disruptions that you see and a lot of the deception that‘s going on in terms of disinformation that many Americans apparently are believing.
MADDOW: Why do you think it is that profits for health insurance companies have ballooned so dramatically over the past seven years or so? We‘ve seen since 2000 to 2007, we‘ve seen such a dramatic increase in profits. Why is that?
POTTER: Well, for one thing, since 1993, in particular, the amount of money that the insurance companies take in on premiums, less and less of that is going—they‘re using it to pay medical claims—in 1993, it‘s about 95 percent. In a couple years ago, it was down to just around 80 percent. So, that‘s one way.
Another is that they kick sick people off the rolls when they do get sick or when people get injured—either through, whether they have bought their insurance through the individual market or through small employers.
It‘s—and also, they‘re paying fewer claims.
MADDOW: Well, if the government were to provide a health insurance option to the public, for example, like a widening of Medicare so that anybody could opt into it if they wanted to do—could private insurance companies compete alongside a government-run non-profit plan like that?
POTTER: Well, they could, absolutely. I‘ve seen the health insurance industry change its business models many, many times. The insurance companies who operate now are very different from the companies that operated a few years ago. They adapt very quickly. And the one thing they know how to do is make money.
MADDOW: You worked for CIGNA for 15 years, you left last year.
What caused you to change your mind about what you were doing and to leave?
POTTER: Well, two things. One, it was kind of gradually. One instance or in one regard because I was becoming increasingly skeptical of the kinds of insurance policies that the big insurance companies are promoting and marketing these days. And they‘re really pushing more people into the so-called consumer-directed plans that feature high deductibles, and that is a leading reason why so many more people are in the category of the underinsured.
The other thing that really made me make this final decision to leave the industry occurred when I was visiting family in Tennessee a couple of summers ago, and I picked up the local newspaper and saw a story about the health care expedition that was being held across the state line in Virginia, in the coal mining area in southwest of Virginia. So, out of curiosity, I just went up there to check it out and was absolutely dumbstruck when I went through the fairground gates. This is being held at the Wise County fairground.
And what I saw when I went inside the fairground‘s gates were hundreds and hundreds of people who were lined up, waiting in the rain, to get care that was being provided to them by volunteer doctors throughout the state of Virginia in animal stalls. Other volunteers had come previously to scrub down the animal stalls to make sure that they were sanitary enough for these doctors to treat people who otherwise couldn‘t get any care.
MADDOW: And this is the system that the health industry has been able to construct and lead us into over the past—over the past generation and that they‘re fighting so hard to preserve now.
POTTER: That‘s right.
MADDOW: Wendell Potter, senior fellow on health care at the Center for Media and Democracy, a man who‘s been through a very big change in his life in recent years—thanks very much for joining us, sir.
POTTER: Thank you, Rachel.


This is the video of Glenn Beck's show from last night (8-11-09) condensed into 10 minutes.
I have never seen so many health care scare tactics and talk about eugenics in such a short period of time.
You have to watch.
http://progressnotcongress.org/?p=2505
I saw it as it happened on his show last night. If sponsors ever had a reason to pull their money from his show, this is surely it.
Regarding insurance company profits, if you take in lots of money and refuse to spend much of it on the service you promised, you will have big profits. That's the bottom line and it stinks.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erZ_WThcC_g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYGzMshsVb0&NR=1
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
Soaring profits and soaring sores.
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
It's the americon dream, everyone who's upset is obviously jealous ...... tis what the US has been telling the world every time anyone criticises it's actions, and typically the people.
Lets see if that changes.
get the MSM and CNN to put Potter on!
Call -write- email ---lets get on it!
Pay your insurance bill and then you get denied for a medical test or operation when needed. Something is wrong with this picture.
Or paying your home insurance bill for years and years then finding out the insurance company doesn't feel they are making enough money so they cancel your policy along with everyone else's in the state and leave the state. Something is wrong with that picture also.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
that was supposed to be left in escrow for future claims goes with them. Really wrong!
it's hit and run at any cost. now we're suppose to adapt in a short amount of time. there are those that are not concerned about collateral damage.
I find myself insured by Citizens, the government run homeowners insurance company, and my rates immediately went down by over 20%. I really don't think we have to worry about government run health insurance. Once the stockholders and profit sharing are eliminated from the equation, services like these can come down to reasonable levels.
It's theft, pure and simple.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
often what capitalism is?
..Flood Insurance. Go ask Katrina victims.
Mickey: "It was an epiphany. Do you know what an epipany is?"
Keoni: "NOT NOW MICKEY!"
in my opinion this has to become more of the dominate angle regarding health care cost/insurance reform. the current for-profit health care system is becoming a systemic problem. capitalists believe they can trump any argument with the chant of "free market"/capitalism as if it never fails/never needs rescue. the automakers came to the government for help as did the financial institutions. now the government is going to "we the people" and telling what the future holds for health care cost in this country. it's NOT sustainable. COST will double(again) in less than 10 years. it will become a systemic problem that will further affect our economy. this country needs to become more competitive in the global economy. CHINA is going to a universal health care system. that's no benefit in slowing down job/business outsourcing. the for-profit/capitalists/NOT "free market" health care system is creating a lot of collateral damage to our economy,culture and lifestyle. it's costing everyone. the government has NO choice but to intervene. this is NOT some PET project for president obama. this is for the future health of this country.
Let's just call the whole thing off and let the vampires run amuck for a few more years.
The crap has not REALLY hit the fan yet.
When it does, the big jig will be up.
We have peak oil, peak energy, peak ecology, peak capitalism and peak humanity.
We also have neo feudalism.
statusquObama, change you can only pretend in
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1x062XmBvbc
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
The problem to the solution of peak oil is that it'll likely result in turning earth into a second Venus. (hello coal)
This is why colonizing and terraforming Mars is important. Liberals can have one planet, conservatives the other. Centrists will be free to choose. Then in a couple centuries the two planets can check in on each other and see which society didn't devolve into the Dark Ages.
Fiscal libertarians can have one of the Jovian moons.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0S0zNFzK_ns
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
we could all really let the market decide and stop buying the product.
God Bless Wendell Potter. Wendell, you have no idea how many million Americans are indebted to you. God Bless you, Wendell.
read those statistics and think that everything is OK with the health care system as it stands??
Really, I'd like to know (assuming they are a consumer) how it's justified.
I'm with Rachel in a 100 percent serious way; huge profits for providing a great service and big CEO pay? OK, that's cool, I guess.
But how can we allow this to continue?
Why are rubes standing up and effectively defending this madness??
"But how can we allow this to continue?" Mike V wonders....
I just arrived home from a meeting with Rep. John Olver (D - The Berkshires) who is a long term supporter of H.R. 676 and a member of the Progressive Caucus.
I was with 9 other individuals that included doctors, psychologists, teachers etc.
Even though he is aware that Conyers H.R. 676 will come to a full House vote in September, even after the C.B.O. has scored the bill (and members of Physicians for a National Health Program feel confident that the scoring will show it to be the most cost effective solution to health reform that will cover EVERYONE), that even THEN there will only be about 180 "Yes" votes for the bill.
The Baucus/Grassley committee in the Senate are trying to kill a "robust public option" and substitute "Co-ops" instead which, according to the data I've read, have proven to be a failure.
The insurance/big pharma lobbies are pulling out all the stops to make sure that NONE of their profits will be touched and if possible that a plan will be voted on that will entrench them even DEEPER into the American health care equation.
The Progressive Caucus is threatening to vote NO on any bill that does NOT include a robust public option (and our understanding is that only about 10 million Americans would be covered by that).
I mentioned to the Congressman that there have been articles suggesting that the Blue Dogs will come around in the end and support President Obama because they will ultimately be looking to the Democratic Central Committee to bankroll their next re-elections. Rep. Olver set me straight by telling me, "That is NOT true!!! These Blue Dogs can EASILY have their elections bankrolled by big insurance and big pharma!!! They do NOT need the Democratic Party's money to win ANY election!"
So, the bottom line?
Corporations have every base covered to continue their stranglehold on their profit-based health insurance/employer based models etc. Their lobbyists are swarming all over D.C. and the corporate media appear to be backing their message and the message of big pharma.
Rep. Olver's thinking is that the system, unfortunately, may need to get MUCH worse before the American people change their thinking regarding the best way to "fix" our broken system.
I suggested the metaphor that our health care system is a very sick patient. Right now it seems the corporations are calling out the wrong diagnosis AND treatment.
Until those who understand the CORRECT diagnosis and the CORRECT treatment (Single-Payer....Everyone In and Nobody Out), are able to be IN CHARGE, we are putting the patients life (our health and the health of our economy) at risk of dying (bankruptcy).
And there's my report of our health care meeting with Rep. Olver.
Abbybwood, R.N.
"The US has an army of 90,000 soldiers in Afghanistan and is spending $100bn a year, but has still been unable to defeat 20,000-25,000 Taliban who receive no pay at all." - Patrick Cockburn
to win ANY election." No, but they need our votes! We must simply remember this, and keep reminding others.
..we're probably not going to get a Public Option or Health Care Insurance Reform in any substantial form because politicians have been paid off and there's so much resistance from astroturf groups that maybe the President should VETO any bill that comes along without the Public Option. I'm trying to remain optimistic but I don't see him using the Veto.
Mickey: "It was an epiphany. Do you know what an epipany is?"
Keoni: "NOT NOW MICKEY!"
Let's put it this way....
It's gonna be a very raucus and uncertain Fall.
There is a lot of jockeying going on right now for a LOT of power and a LOT of money.
Just my opinion.
"The US has an army of 90,000 soldiers in Afghanistan and is spending $100bn a year, but has still been unable to defeat 20,000-25,000 Taliban who receive no pay at all." - Patrick Cockburn
For honest people and a place for the truth to be told.
"I know that there are people who do not love their fellow
man, and I hate people like that! " ~ Tom Lehrer (1928 - )
to me this is possibly the ultimate strategy of those that support health care cost reform. once the industry model has been cracked/breached maybe a single payer system will morph from a "public option". maybe that's the "endgame". a transition from"public option"( whatever that is) to single payer. it's not easy going against the health care lobbyist/special interests that don't want to fix anything until it's completely broken not unlike the health care insurance industry who doesn't want to pay for services until someone is chronic.
call it what you will: neoclassic, neoliberal, supply-side, reaganomics, etc.
putting soaring profits before everything (health, environment, peace, etc.) is the economic paradigm forced down our throats daily.
wendell potter: thanks for growing a conscience and helping to expose those that profit from denying americans healthcare.
n/t
I wouldnt be "one bit worried" about "competition from the govt.
govt has proven time and time again that they cant do shit.
Next up for bailout? USPS
By GREGG CARLSTROM
November 16, 2008
Add the U.S. Postal Service to the list of ailing businesses seeking help from Congress.
http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=3821780
audit-prosecute-incarcerate
There is always ONE Libertarian goofball.
Medicare is a government program that works very well. Highly efficient, except for Part D which was a Republican sponsored massive giveaway to big pharma.
The Military Industrial Complex is a joint Public/Private venture that works very well. For those private interests it is designed to serve, which is not the commonweal.
Government has transfered ENORMOUS sums to the Banksters. Paulson the Plunderer was Mussolini like in his efficiency. Geithner and Bernanke are right behind him.
Government does a lot of things very well. The problem is only a few of those things are for the public at large.
Large government/private ventures which only profit the private interests is a definition of fascism. In my book.
statusquObama, change you can only pretend in
.
"The US has an army of 90,000 soldiers in Afghanistan and is spending $100bn a year, but has still been unable to defeat 20,000-25,000 Taliban who receive no pay at all." - Patrick Cockburn
You mean to tell me that there are large herds of people in this country that hasn't figured this out yet?
Massive amounts, MASSIVE.
That must be the mother of all oxymorons and euphemisms all at once.
All I can say is 'What do you expect?' This is the kind of country we live in. Where profits are the most important thing. That's why we should make for-profit health insurance illegal. This will never stop as long as there is a profit motive involved.
Wendell nails it. My mother paid BCBS for 45 years. In 6 months - from December 2008 until her death on May 31, 2009 - she was in nursing homes and hospitals.
BCBS made her caregivers BEG for weekly extensions to her care.
On May 1, BCBS decided they had enough of this profit sucker.
They informed her that her policy would terminate on June 1, 2009.
At that point, she was on her own.
Don't fool yourselves - MediCare was nearly as fucked up. That program would only cover 20 days in the nursing home. Then she got to pay $150 PER DAY just to stay there to continue getting better. With no insurance.
Nice setup, huh?
The answer - go on MedicAid. Sure - you can only have $2000 in assets. Poor by any standard.
Even if you are approved for MedicAid, it still does not cover you 100%. They have a baseline figure that they will pay. From there, you keep on racking up the bills and then they go after things like your home to defray your costs.
If you have transferred assets prior to getting sick, they then go back 5 years and attempt to recover transferred assets.
It's a jumbled, fucked up mess and we can do better by our citizens.
BTW - did you notice the dates? My mother died on May 31, 2009 at 11:51 PM - 9 minutes before BCBS pulled the plug.
the last laugh, but had to die to win...which is their MO.
Sorry about Mom
If I knew then what I know now, I would have shuffled off to Canada to work before I started my family
What happened to your mother was a crime.
And if there is no legislation currently in "the books" then there should be.
As I like to say, the American people have already paid for full health insurance benefits....from cradle to grave. Which includes eye, dental care and hospice (humane/respectful end of life care).
The only problem is that the Congress/President apparently didn't get "the memo"....
They continue to expend our sweat and treasure on the military industrial complex rather than the "LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS" of the taxpayers.
God will never forgive any of these corporate whores for their sins.
Abbybwood, R.N.
Proud member of Physicians for a National Health Program
"The US has an army of 90,000 soldiers in Afghanistan and is spending $100bn a year, but has still been unable to defeat 20,000-25,000 Taliban who receive no pay at all." - Patrick Cockburn
will include stipulations that insurance companies cannot deny coverage for pre-existing conditions.
Woop-fucking-eee
They will just price those people out of the market.
OK, that profit problem solved.
Next?
If we eliminated all health care industry profits the $12.9B saved would reduce the average cost to 250M insured Americans by ~$50 each. This isn't the cause of exploding health care costs. Plowing those profits into care for those who would otherwise be cut off would have a societal benefit but controlling profits won't solve the health care crisis.
Comments are closed on this entry