Go Home

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (1746)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (5789)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

God we need about a hundred more Howard Deans out there to put a stop to the Republican fear mongering. When Newt Gingrich tries to say that getting the waste out of Medicare Advanatage that is a giveaway to the private insurance companies is taking something away from seniors, Dean straightens him out and tells him no, it's taking away from the insurance companies that are ripping us off.

Dean and Durbin both did a good job on Meet the Press today against Gingrich and Cornyn.

MR. GREGORY: Let's talk about the deficit. And the president made a very important pledge during this speech on Wednesday.

(Videotape, Wednesday)

PRES. OBAMA: I will not sign it if it adds one dime to the deficit now or in the future. Period.

(End videotape)

MR. GREGORY: Senator Durbin, a hard pledge to meet when you've got House legislation that already does that, it already breaks the deficit. It can't be paid for over 10 years, according to the CBO. Here's a Washington Post editorial this morning having to do with where are the details, does the math work: "When politicians start talking about paying for programs by cutting `waste and abuse,' you should get nervous. When they don't provide specifics--and when the amounts under discussion are in the hundreds of billions of dollars--you should get even more nervous." How does this get paid for without adding to the deficit?

SEN. DURBIN: Members of Congress should take the president at his word, he will not sign a bill that adds to the deficit. He walked into the White House and inherited a $1 trillion-plus deficit from the Republican administration because they had fought a war in Iraq they didn't pay for, the gave tax breaks to the wealthy they didn't pay for and they had a prescription drug program under Medicare they didn't pay for. This president said that's over, and members of Congress should take that seriously. Now, I disagree with The Washington Post. The fact is, under Medicare now we are providing multibillion-dollar subsidies to health insurance companies for something called Medicare Advantage. The health insurance companies said to us, let us run Medicare. We can show you how the government's not doing it efficiently, we can do it at a lower cost. Guess what, it's not at a lower cost. We are subsidizing private health insurance companies to provide the Medicare benefits that we can provide at a lower cost. That has to change. That subsidy has to end. That is the kind of savings that can come back into the system to help small businesses provide health insurance and help those with lower incomes pay their premiums in America.

MR. GREGORY: How does...

FMR. REP. GINGRICH: Well, first of all...

MR. GREGORY: Speaker Gingrich, how do you keep that pledge?

FMR. REP. GINGRICH: ...listen care--first of all, listen carefully to what he just said. He just said to the senior citizens of America, "We're going to take hundreds of billions of dollars out of Medicare and we're going to divert it to people who aren't senior citizens." Now, this is part of why you're seeing these town hall meetings. People who are on Medicare Advantage in rural America are getting a quality of health care they never got before. I just got an e-mail from somebody at the Gundersen Lutheran Clinic in La Crosse. They're on Medicare Advantage. They don't want to be forced to give this up. And it's interesting; the president says on the one hand, nobody has to give up anything. But by the way, if you're a senior citizen on Medicare Advantage, we're going to take a couple hundred billion dollars away from you. I think this, this section you showed of the president is an example of why we are in the kind of debate we're in right now. I don't believe most Americans believe it's possible to have the plan he wants and not see the deficit go up; unless he's going to propose, in the middle of the deepest recession since the Great Depression, massive tax increases which would further deepen the recession.

DR. DEAN: First of all, the money is not being taken away from senior citizens, it's being taken away from the insurance companies who are responsible for a lot of them problems in the first place. Second of all, it pains me deeply to see one of the great optimists, which is House Speaker Gingrich--you are. I mean, we agree on a lot of stuff. And the great--the thing we have in common is America can do anything. Every other democracy in the world has a healthcare system that covers everybody and we don't. Of course we can do this. How ridiculous.

MR. GREGORY: But, Dr. Dean, you have said, when you were running for president in 2004, people have to understand that you got to pay for it.

DR. DEAN: That's right.

MR. GREGORY: If you want that coverage, you've got to pay for it.

DR. DEAN: And the president is paying for it...

MR. GREGORY: And how do you not raise taxes?

DR. DEAN: And two-thirds of the money that's being--when President Obama talks about taking $500 million out of Medicare, that's not taking $500 million--billion dollars away from seniors. That's taking the waste that the Republicans have been talking about for years, the abuse that the Republicans have talked about for years, the stuff that the insurance companies are getting for profit over and above what their services are. They're--two-thirds of this bill is paid for with savings. And if you don't think the savings are there, then how come we spend 17 percent of our gross national production on health care and, and the Canadians, the British, the French, all of whom insure everybody, spend about 10 percent? There is so much fat in this system, we can pay for it.

SEN. CORNYN: David, we've got to be honest about the cost, and so far we haven't heard the president be clear about the cost. The Senate Budget Committee estimates that the House bill will cost not $1 trillion, but $2.2 trillion. The HELP Committee bill, the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Senate Committee bill is estimated to cost $2.2 trillion over a full 10-year budget window. We need to be honest about what the cost is, what the pay forwards are going to be in terms of tax increases, cuts into existing programs that are already very fragile and not, and not going to be solvent by 2017, and then I think that's what is making people nervous. That's why people are speaking up and expressing...

DR. DEAN: Right.

SEN. CORNYN: ...their concerns.

MR. GREGORY: Well, Senator Durbin, look, you're in the Senate leadership. Can you say unequivocally that taxes will not have to go up in order to pay for a $900 billion healthcare reform plan?

SEN. DURBIN: Of course not. That's irresponsible. What the president said, if we're going to need new revenue, and some revenue will be needed, it'll come from those who can afford to pay. He's talked about tax increases for those making over $250,000 a year, a tax increase on health insurance companies for certain policies they sell. I mean, those are, those are the realities of the situation.

And let me tell you, I've heard this song before from Mr. Gingrich and from others that we just can't do it, that America's incapable of doing it. But Dr. Dean has it right. This is our chance. If we don't do it this time, we won't have a chance in my lifetime and the situation will get progressively worse. Let us face up to the reality and do this in a responsible way.

Share This Post

Link To This Post


78 Comments

This is how to finance public health care: eliminate private insurers. But the politicians won't do it because they get so much of their bread and butter from OUR PREMIUMS.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...

Milquetoast's picture

...giving the "government industrial complex" a monopoly...("by eliminating insurance companies" as you suggest)

...is a good idea at all!

...govt is presently owned by banks and corporations and giving them control would be like ..."hiring watchdogs to guard your sausage factory".

(maybe we can talk about it when we regain control of our govt?)


audit-prosecute-incarcerate

maximus7's picture

Do it now. The Republiklan party invented Medicare Part C which turned Medicare into a private program which artificially rewarded private companies by subsidizing them with high profits and draining the Medicare Money from Medicare Parts A and B.

Create a new drug benefit in Part B where it should have gone in the first place and get rid of the private insurance companies here too and the benefit should cover 80 percent of patented and generic medications and only have one premium and one annual deductible that Medicare Part B has and by placing it in Medicare Part B we get rid of the Medicare Part D extra premium and extra yearly deductible.

Why do elderly and disabled people have to pay 2 sets of monthly premiums and 2 sets of yearly deductibles to get one drug benefit. Also make sure this benefit has no coverage gap, and also get rid of the Medicare Part B means test.

But we need to attack the companies that fund conservatives in both parties with a withering consumer boycott and email and telephone campaign against United Health Care, Rite Aid Pharmacies, Tyson Chicken and American Express that fund conservatives in both parties.

Don't tell me that you already boycott these companies. Call them and make demands of these companies. Email them. You can find details at http://democratzs.org

DEFEAT THE CRAP EATERS

"Conservatives Resisting Anything Progressive,
Especially Anything That Enables Real Security"

(CRAP EATERS)

GO TO HTTP://DEMOCRATZ.ORG

Alice X - Chomsky Nader's picture

Regaining control of our government would be parallel to the process of setting up single payer.

Single payer could come through HR 676 or through the present Medicare system.

Get Wall Street out of the health care business.


statusquObama, change you can only pretend in

Milquetoast's picture

I know I say I'm not much of a socialist but...if Americans had control of our country...and money... (we should be the richest country on the planet)

I might be up for a few social programs but...I just can't stand to shop with no money...or credit!


audit-prosecute-incarcerate

MinuteMan's picture

n/t

Milquetoast's picture

I'm a fairly liberal guy!

I'm pro choice...

anti war...

athiest...

I don't like to mix religion and politics...(or corporations and politics!)

gay marriage is fine by me...

Dennis Kuchinich is one of my favorite politicians...

I'm a proponent of stem cell research...

I like workers unions...and despise racism...

but yeah (maybe) I got a liberaltarian streak in me...


audit-prosecute-incarcerate

...parallel to?

...monkeys flyin' out of our butts! ...(nagahappen!)

...maybe I'm too pessimistic (think!?)

...(I think wall st. and govt)...are... "one and the same".


audit-prosecute-incarcerate

Jimmi the Grey's picture

Defeatism is handing off more of your power. Be Positive. Be Outspoken. Be a Role Model.

"You can say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one.
I hope some day you will join us, and the world will live as one."

Milquetoast's picture

when you come to the realization that the military, pharma/health, energy, agri, and governmental industrial complexeseses ...are all lined up against us...

It can make things look real bleak sometimes...


audit-prosecute-incarcerate

Jimmi the Grey's picture

When you come to the realization that the military, pharma/health, energy, agri and governmental industrial complexeseses...have scared you to the point of defeating yourself before even attempting to stand-up...

It can bring about things that amaze the mind and empower the soul...

"Get Wall Street out of the health care business."

Get Wall Street out of government business. Get Wall Street out of banking. Get Wall Street out of pensions and retirement.

Milquetoast, your argument makes no sense whatsoever. You complain that the government would have a monopoly, then complain that the government is owned by corporations.

Take the corporations out of the picture and the government is owned by the people. Then it becomes the government's job to serve the people rather than the corporations.

Milquetoast's picture

...govt is owned by corporations.

...and thusly knowing such to be true...

...I would therefore (and not before) ...greatly hesitate to eliminate private insurers...and thusly create a govt monopoly.

...not the other way around.

like I said, lets talk about it AFTER we get control!

In other words...If we had control of our govt...I wouldnt mind discussing healthcare. but...we aint got control!
(I think it would be great if govt would "step up to the plate" (on an even playing field) ...and show us that they can "out do" the "private insurers" (I like freemarket competition and would love to see govt get its act together and participate in such a competition...)someday when we get control that is...


audit-prosecute-incarcerate

haras1966's picture

Sorry, you can't eliminate private insurance companies since they're on the stock exchange, and probably thousands of people have part of their 401Ks invested in their companies. Health insurance companies should have never been allowed to be for-profit to begin with. Was that Reagan?

I read the other day that some of the insurance companies stock went up after Obama's speech. Maybe he didn't say enough about public option and the companies started having orgasms.

Dean is right about the Medicare Advantage program. Humana gave me a hard sell on their plan and tried to get me to sign up with them when I got my drug plan through them. My advice to anyone who is thinking about signing up for the Medicare Advantage program DON'T!

You don't have to eliminate them. Just create a new business model ("competition") and watch them wither and die.

Don't want to lose your 401K? Don't gamble it on stocks.

This is another Congressional Bailout for Wall Street if you add in the subsidies...Goldman et al is currently between you and your Doctor!

Wall Street Banks hold these percentages of shares in Health Insurance giants and are increasing shares by the tens of millions

United 77.32%
WellPoint 79.04%
Aetna 79.45%
CIGNA Corp. 68.71%
Coventry Health 82.25%
Health Net Inc. 79.37%

Wall Street is the enemy.

Wall street owns our healthcare and we bailed them out last year for $3 trillion ..Do we need to do it again?

Send these stats to your Congress people..or call 1.800.828.0498 or 1. 866.220.0044

chadche's picture

..... you mean cutting out a profit motivated middleman will reduce costs for the consumer/patient. That idea is SOCIALIST!!!!

Shade Tail's picture

Who cares if it is socialist? And for that matter, do you even know what socialism is?

Milquetoast's picture

Russia, or China...

is that predjudice?

I have never read the communist manifesto ...but I hear it sounds good on paper!!!


audit-prosecute-incarcerate

Social democracies include The United Kingdom, Switzerland, Germany, Sweden, Norway, France, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Italy, New Zealand, Canada, Australia, etc.

If you've ever been to any of these places the quality of life is fantastic and the people are very happy.

savannah43's picture

Now you sound like a GOP wing nut. Was that your intention? Google, then compare and contrast. Basic info gathering. Try it.

lafingas's picture

the kings gave pirates the legal right to rob. They called them “privateers” that is just what the insurance companies are today!

MinuteMan's picture

The term, that is, not those actually wielding the de facto letters of marque.

lafingas's picture

:>)

readerOfTeaLeaves's picture

Durbin's repetitions about all the things the Republicans did **not** pay for needs to be repeated a whole lot more.

And Dean's point that the insurance companies are creaming off tax dollars needs to be repeated over, and over, and over again.

As for Gingrich and Coryn: Profiles in Economic Lunacy and Fiscal Mismanagement. All they do is criticize, because Durbin is correct, and they don't have a prayer in hell of disproving what Durbin and Dean are saying.

Handypants's picture

All of the sudden the M$M corporate shills want to know "how are we going to pay for it?"

I can't remember any of those questions about Bunnypants' personal war . . .

Hypocrisy knows no bounds.


"I know that there are people who do not love their fellow
man, and I hate people like that!
" ~ Tom Lehrer (1928 - )

Milquetoast's picture

...all your money to banks and corporations.

he voted for a bankster bailout with no oversite.

he also voted for a stimulus plan (750 billion) that had little effect on the economy.

Obama also voted to give Chimpster all the war money he ever asked for (when he was a senator)

...and if mainstream media pointed out the fact that "Chimpys war" ...is the reason we can't have a healthcare plan ...it would backfire on Obama since he never voted down any of Chimpy's "war requisitions" (not to mention) ...the fact that Obama voted for trillions for the banksters and goldman/sachs ...would most certainly rear its ugly head and thusly a double backfire!)

Obama (is a neocon) who voted (right along with Bush) for the patriot act, wiretapping immunity, a bankster bailout, and all the war money that the pentagon ever asked for! (and Afghanistan is fixin' ta get worse!!!)

Obama is going to continue the bailouts and the wars...better to just not talk about it!


audit-prosecute-incarcerate

Teddy Phufner's picture

Obama chose Wall Street rather than main street, and proved he was a Corporatist with the bailouts. "Too big to fail?" WTF??!!?! Than change it so you can't get too big again!!! Geithner and cronies made sure the system was not gonna change. The Bernie Madoff story could have been parlayed into major reform, instead of tabloid fodder, but this administration wants to sweep it under the rug. Obama couldn't be happier now that the media frenzy and Stewart v Cramer is over.

Shade Tail's picture

...because for some of it, he was the President (who *doesn't* have a vote), and for most of the rest of it, he didn't actually vote for it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/...

This is not change, it never was, and only low information voters could have ever believed otherwise!!!

Milquetoast's picture

I suppose next you will tell me that Arlen Specter and Joe Lieberman are progressives?


audit-prosecute-incarcerate

chadche's picture

....raising taxes to pay for the war, we borrowed from China. That's ok, God forbid the wealthy pay higher taxes. Now China won't lend us money, so we have to raise revenue domestically. Now it's time for a revolt!!!

Bush is white and Obama is black. There, did I answer your concerns?

bamboozled's picture

They only want to know where the money is going to come from when they know it's not going to come out of their profits (or in the case of a few media conglomerates, when they know it's going to CONTRIBUTE to their profits).

neoconbuster's picture

In one year TRILLION With a T "Missing" from the pentagon

In ONLY the Fiscal year 2000 and nobody spoke about that deficit...But Cynthia Kckinney and she was OUSTED:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eootfzAhAoU

ron's picture

I signed up for a medicare advantage plan when I first became eligible for medicare. The problem was the doctor and other doctors in my area wouldn't accept the plan. Free money for United Healthcare.

savannah43's picture

If you do, you are lucky. It works just fine. The advantage plans are scams, just like Medicare Part D. The blatant, "in your face" thievery has to be stopped.

ron's picture

All I had to do is say that I was misled which wwas true.

haras1966's picture

I'm so glad I didn't sign with them. You know the saying:"if it's sounds to good to be true, then it probably is?" That's what I thought when he was explaining to me how much better they plan was over regular Medicare.

mimi's picture

As with anything, there are pros and cons. My parents have Medicare Advantage and have no problem with finding doctors who accept their plan. After they compared traditional Medicare to Medicare Advantage, they found lower deductibles and co-pay costs with a Medicare Advantage plan. There are many different types of Medicare plans. I recommend PlanPrescriber.com to find all the available plans in your zip code and to do a plan comparison.

WizardLeft1's picture

Well, I don't know Howard Dean, but I sure like his ties and suits and of course his fine mind which is very pretty in the age of ugly!

Howard Dean is the man.

Rahm Emanuel is the parasite and enemy of progresives. Rahm Emanuel is the reason why Howard Dean has no position in the Obama administration.

Paul Begala and James Carville are also enemies of Howard Dean as well. Read James MacArthur's book "You Can't Be President" and you understand that the Clinton people hated Howard Dean, and I mean hated him. This includes Carville, Begala and Emanuel.

Again, I would rather chat and get to know Howard Dean rather than the slimy Dems like Carville, Begala and Emanuel.

More than just the hideous Republicans, Rahm Emanuel is not only Obama's biggest problem right now, but he (Emanuel) is an enemy of the progressive/liberal base which he-Emanuel detests! You have to remember that Emanuel is a foreign policy hawk on war issues and the left is against that position. Emanuel's animus against the left and progressives goes back to the 2006 elections.

Teddy Phufner's picture

When Obama chose Rahm as his COS, it was a very disappointing and telling sign of things to come. Obama to appears to be Clinton II rather than a true reformer like Dean, and dare I say John Edwards would have been, more about political opportunity than really changing policy.

WizardLeft1's picture

I was listening to Dave Marsh today on Sirius Left 146 and even he said that Rahm Emanuel is The Problem right now and perhaps more so than any other Democrat walking around in Washington D.C.

On another note--which I saw no reports on this week---Howard Stern said on his Tuesday Radio show on Howard 100 that the attacks against Obama regarding his school speech was RACISM. Howard Stern even hung up and told his callers to shove it if they did not like his view on this one as well.

Xboxershorts's picture

naaah, not even close to the unnamed one...

None the less, I am not happy that he occupies that post.

And I would nominate Dr. Dean

Teddy Phufner's picture

Durbin touches on it, but what the Dems message should focus on, in addition to changing the abuse and subsidies to insurance and Big Pharma, is tax reform. Realizing Americans have a Pavlovian response to the word, and the Right has brainwashed the ignorant masses to believe raising taxes on the rich means the world is collapsing but isn't this the essence Left vs Right--the distribution of wealth.
The Dems need to frame all of this as a populist battle of the richest 5% vs the rest of us. And when the Right screams their Friedmanesque talking points, counter with Eisenhower tax rates (and 50's prosperity) provide lists of corporate subsidies (welfare) and corporate tax evasion, and go hardcore on how the war on the middle class since Reagan.
If the Right is gonna pull out all the stops, why not go hardcore populist. Let's have it out , and make this not only about health care, but about how we are gonna distribute ALL resources in our society--either by letting the rich elite control and "trickle" it down, or are we gonna provide a equitable society for all. Hammer it home already!!!

Dr. Dean: ...And the great--the thing we have in common is America can do anything. Every other democracy in the world has a healthcare system that covers everybody and we don't. Of course we can do this. How ridiculous.

Boom. We're Americans dammit! If it can be done elsewhere, it can be done better, faster, cheaper, and more-fun-at-parties by US. Americans.

And I Double-Dog-Dare you to say I'm wrong.

Sure, we'll just outsource it to India or China or Indonesia to reduce labor costs and maximize profits. Who cares if millions of Americans are thrown under the bus? We're talking GLOBAL markets here.

Xboxershorts's picture

Please hilite this portion:

If we don't do it this time, we won't have a chance in my lifetime and the situation will get progressively worse. Let us face up to the reality and do this in a responsible way.

shag12@sbcglobal.net's picture

I am thrilled everytime I see Dr. Dean out in front on this issue. Not only is he knowledgeable about the issue, he won't let Republicans punk him with lies.

bamboozled's picture

what a fucknut:

Dear XXXX,

As you may be aware, the attacks and threats from the liberal Democrats have not let up.

On Fox News I made one thing clear: I will not apologize to Nancy Pelosi and her allies who threatened to censure me in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Washington Democrats and their liberal allies want to divert attention away from the concerns about the massive government takeover of health care. In fact, they have made me their Number One target-- already raising more than a million dollars to attack me.

But I will not give up and I will not back down from our fight. We will not be muzzled.

I need your help today.

Will you please make a donation to help me fight back against these unwavering attacks?

Thank you for standing with me in this fight,

Joe Wilson
U.S. Representative

Susan J.'s picture

YOU started it. We're merely the clean-up crew.

Evet's picture

on Wall Street still pay no sales tax on hundreds of trillions of transactions for that matter?

And why do they not pay income tax on the money they bring home by way of bonuses and however else they make it. As it is now they pay capital gains (at 18%?) as opposed to income tax at 38%. It is a pure rip off and could be a great source of income for the people.

Milquetoast's picture

...wall st insiders to important position in the treasury and other impotent oversite positions in our govt.

Obama is a neo-con who (much like Chimpy) does'nt wanna tax the rich...


audit-prosecute-incarcerate

savannah43's picture

Huh?

Milquetoast's picture

what a neo-con is... I'll help you understand what a teabagger is!

When I think of Neo-con I think of... Lobbyists in powerful govt positions, the Patriot act, wiretapping, bankster bailouts and war and keeping a lid on the torturers...and keeping a lid on any new investigations into 9/11

all of which Obama supports (directly and indirectly)

...where did I go wrong?


audit-prosecute-incarcerate

Milquetoast's picture

...I would never do that to you miss kitty!


audit-prosecute-incarcerate

angrymob's picture

"Neo-con" isn't just a loose perjorative for "people who do bad shit in government". It describes a very specific political ideology, neo-conservatism, whose proponents are descended from liberal (in the American sense) and even socialist/leftist traditions, who have become more right-wing (i.e., they have newly become conservative, hence neo-conservative), and take the view that American military and economic power should be exercised to encourage the spread of democracy (and, along side it, American hegemony) throughout the world. The keystone of this movement is the Project for a New American Century, which brought together all the luminaries of the Bush Administration. See their statement of principles, here:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementof..., signed by Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Libby, Francis Fukuyama, etc.

Milquetoast's picture

sounds like Obama to me!

on that note...teabaggers are sick of it all and are not just mad about "healthcare"

...most of us realize that democrats and republicans are no different and neither party is working for we the people.

Teabaggers are independents, libertarians, greenpartyers, and former (moderate) liberals and conservatives (who woke up) and are mad as hell and ain't gonna take it anymore!

and most of us (original teabaggers) have been around since before the heath issue even came up!

...teabaggers (technically) were born last april 15th to be exact! (before healthcare came up)

Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity are actually neo-cons (just like Obama) ...who have jumped aboard the teabagger hay wagon to boost ratings (cuz being a Bush fan set them back so far) ...and to make us look bad...but dont let em fool you!


audit-prosecute-incarcerate

angrymob's picture

Beck and Hannity are NOT neo-cons, they are Barry Goldwater-style conservatives at best, or fascists at worst. A neo-con is someone like Wolfowitz - drives a Prius, wants to save the world, but thinks the way to do that is by sticking America's military in everywhere.

This does look a LOT like traditional American interventionism and exceptionalism, and Obama is definitely a practitioner of American exceptionalism, but there is a difference - traditional American interventionists were of the mind of, say, Henry Kissinger: they want to control the world to ensure that everything goes well for America. This is the policy Obama is pursuing in Afghanistan, and the reason many liberals were upset with the war in Iraq - not because it was an unjust war, or because millions of Iraqis died, but because it was waged for ideological, rather than realpolitik, reasons. That is, it was waged in the face of "good sense" in the "this will make America more powerful" sense. Wolfowitz wanted us to invade Iraq so that it could become a democracy; Obama would only have invaded Iraq if he thought it would, ultimately, boost American GDP, access to oil resources, etc.

Milquetoast's picture

...and I'm glad you didn't call Beck and Hannity libertarians...

I still think Beck is a neo-con though...

3 minute video!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6C6E6ayh4U&eu...


audit-prosecute-incarcerate

As Obama said, "the time for bickering is over. It's time to just do it." Never forget that the Republicans never want to do anything a Democrat wants to do. Ever. They are obstructionists.

Milquetoast's picture

Obama always did what Bush wanted him to do!

...and he continues the Bush legacy right in your face!

...the torturers got away with it...

...the phone and internet tapping continues...

...more bankster bailouts are on the way...

...lobbyists occupy powerful govt oversite positions...

...and Afghanistan is a fixin' ta get bigger...

and the pentagons budget does not shrink by a dime...


audit-prosecute-incarcerate

rmb's picture

When a public insurance option happens and it will happen in the next five years, I want Howard Dean in charge.


This is not my father's America

zoe's picture

Now the Republicans are insisting about "being honest about the cost" of heathcare reform. Were they ever honest about their invasion of Iraq & what that cost & continues to cost, in money & in lives? Oh, that we could afford, I forgot...

Mia Kulper's picture

"In other words...If we had control of our govt...I wouldnt mind discussing healthcare. but...we aint got control!"

Let me know the moment we have that control so we can start discussing healthcare, that is, if you really don't mind.

Did you look in all the cushions?

Milquetoast's picture

all the lobbyists, bankers, wall st insiders, and corporate leaders are still sitting on the couch!!! (they wont get up) even though the beer keg is empty and the party food is all gone!...

I am thinking about starting a small fire in a garbage can or something...what do you think? ...good idea or what?


audit-prosecute-incarcerate

blackjack's picture

DO not Forgit that David Gregory is a REPUBLICAN Corporate Controled Media Person. Why do the people always forgit these little FACTS?

NAVDOC3rdMAR's picture

The Congress is back in session and doing the dirty work for the Medical Industrial Complex.

mcconnell $3.3M, hatch $2.9M, baucus $2.8M, grassley $2.7M,
lieberman $2.6M, burr $2.4M, ensign $2.4M, cornyn $2.2M, kyl $2.1M,
conrad $2.1M, cantor $1.8M boehner $1.7M, coburn $1.2M, j wilson 800K
were paid by the Medical Industrial Complex to kill Health Care Reform.

Citizens for Tax Justice pointed this out. The tax legislation enacted under President George W. Bush from 2001 through 2006 will cost $2.48 trillion over the 2001-2010 period. This includes the revenue loss of $2.11 trillion that results directly from the Bush tax cuts as well as the $379 billion in additional interest payments on the national debt that we must make since the tax cuts were deficit-financed. Over the upcoming decade (2010-2019), the costs of the health care proposals approved by three committees in the U.S. House of Representatives are projected to be around $1 trillion and deficit neutral(that means they're paid for). In 2010, when all the Bush tax cuts are finally phased in, a staggering 52.5 percent of the benefits will go to the richest 5 percent of taxpayers. The Bush tax cuts were deficit-financed, which increased the national debt and resulted in greater interest payments on that debt. They never even tried to pay for their tax-cuts. So, for the price of bush's tax-cuts for the wealthiest 5%, we could have had Health Care for every American. Instead Americans got bupkus and cheney/bush's republican buddies got filthy rich off of the Blood Money from No-Bid, Cost-Plus Federal Contracts.

12 Million Americans were denied Health Care Coverage by the Medical Industrial Complex because they had a Pre-Existing Medical Condition. 12K Americans lose Insurance Coverage everyday. Over 18K Americans die each day because they lack health insurance. (Source: WaPo Article 05' by Harvard Prof. E. Warren)

Follow the Money: Link

Call Congress and demand, Single-Payer Health Care for All!

Sign Single-Payer Petition: Link

Don't let the Medical Industrial Complex steal your Health Care from you and your family by donating huge sums of money to Crooked Politicians in order to maintain the Status Quo. Keep up the good fight.

SEMPER FI!

FloydGeorge104's picture

fucktards want to here facts.

It's hard to take Republicans seriously when they ignored Bush's massive spending. Guess it's okay for Republican presidents to drive up the deficit, especially when spending on war and giving tax breaks to rich people.

FloydGeorge104's picture

WTF. why is nwet ganggreen another wife cheating asshole on TV. He is not elected to any office, his past as a repug asshole is quit clear. Has been cought in 1 lie after. Mic gerory is nothing more than a repug hack.I wonder if he calls them to see WHO they want on the TV. We need to thump the profit at any cost insurance companys. BSBC, have increased my deductible every year for the last 3 years. It now sits at $500 pr family member. this above the bullshit of $147 a pay day. so let me see $147 x 26 paydays=$3822 a year+3 people @ $500=$5322 a year. and the $15 co-pay per visit. Shit I forgot the Preferred part, that at $4,500 for a Family.hell the Non-Preferred is $6,500. This is called health insurance. This is called, we are going to butfuck you with No reach around.

Can O Whoopass's picture

of Newt Gingrich is of an overblown child who will repeat anything he hears.

FloydGeorge104's picture

repug Family Values. Dump your wife for a woman he was screwing for a year when she is in the hospital. Its all just one big bullshit game on the American people. The TV assholes keep putting these jack-off on TV. Its like they don't want any real change. they just want to keep the shit going.

willymack's picture

Dr Dean, as usual cuts through all the distracting twaddle the neocons would confuse people with and states FACTS that would take anyone with half a brain to verify in a minute or less.
Now, we come to the sad fact of our public awareness, which is not nearly what it should be.
This is directly related to our public educational systems, which have suffered from decades of neglect and abuse, and produced a generation of ignoramuses, incapable of critical thought or analytical skills.
The fact that so many of us believe in a 6,000 year-old Earth, that humans are contemporary with dinasaurs, and the commercial success of that obscenity of a "Creation" museum in Kentucky speak for themselves.
No wonder we're half-assed, ass-backwards, and a century behind the times here. For shame.

You've drank the kool-aid served up for the past 30 years. The communist manifesto mentions nothing about socialism. Socialism is an idea and communism is a political system....

Comments are closed on this entry