You can view this video right here by getting the latest version of Flash Player!
DOWNLOADS: (959)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (2803)
Play WMV Play Quicktime

Howard Dean is right as usual. Dr. Nancy points out the New York Times/CBS poll which says that 65% of Americans are in favor of a public option and asks Dean where the disconnect is. Dean points out the obvious-- the money going into the campaign coffers of elected officials that they're paying more attention to than their constituents.

I agree with Howard Dean. If the Democrats pass a bill without a public option, there is going to be a huge backlash against the party. I know Howard must feel like a broken record at this point, but I'm glad he's still out there pushing for the Democrats to do the right thing.



Login or Register to post comments.

121 comments

to Mr. Dean... if not, they'll be listening to the American people!! I don't know how they don't get it... the people want a public option so be damned what the politicians want!!

no matter what your purpose is.

Go home to your family, and pay your debts.

All they want to do is further their political careers and political agendas. And that means not biting the hands that feed you ie large companies.

it's the people who vote these ba$tards in, isn't it? They're biting the hand that votes them in and those frickin' corporations are only with them as long as they do their bidding... There has to be better choices for the people to put into power. It's obvious the politicians in power don't deserve it because they don't know what the hell to do with it.

Yeah, it takes a lot of money to win an election, but it also takes votes and the villagers are paying very close attention to this.

...........another real Democrate!! Huge backlash is the understatement of the world.

I sure hope that's true!!

That ANY American can join (who doesn't already belong to Medicare/Medicaid/VA), there really will not BE a "Public" Option.

According to my understanding of what Obama's "Public Option" would be, is that it would only be available to about 5% of the population. NOT EVERYONE WOULD BE ELIGIBLE TO JOIN IT.

It will be WORSE than merely "watered down". Americans are being led down the garden path on this one.

Here's an article that should help everyone understand "The Public Option" that is REALLY being considered:

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/09/24-11

I wish John Amato would invite someone like Anthony Weiner here to tell us EXACTLY who and what would be covered if a "Public Option" were to be included in any legislation.

Everybody will sit on their hands . . .

NEXT!

and not going to work would indeed be a huge backlash.

Time for a new political party. The ones we have aren't worth keeping.

don't worry there is going to be a new "party" that's obvious. The world central bank party.

This is a all we need to throw the bums out on both sides of the aisle!

So what do we do, turn everything back over to the republicans? Isn't that like cutting off your nose to spite your face?

cutting your head off to spite your face...

I don't know myself honestly.

We're damned if we do (vote Democrat) - we're completely fucked if we don't (Republicans are even worse, sad as that may be).

At the same point, doing nothing isn't an option. The Democrats are not fighting for We the People, at least, a good portion of them are not.

Creating a reliable 3rd party would be ideal; but how to do it... is trickier. It's a vicious cycle - 3rd parties need voters to grow, but voters know if they dont' vote for their main party, then they're pretty much giving votes to the other side; which means that unhappy or not, we end up stuck with Democrats.

Bleh.

I almost wonder - and this is an oddball idea...

What about recruiting some of the most liberal Democrats to help form a 3rd party - people who are already in office and aren't likely to lose (and thus the boat isn't likely to get rocked for them).

In that case you'd have, at least in a few states, a highly visible candidate who people *know* will stand for them - and the party can pick up momentum from there. Course there's a bout a jillion "Ifs" and "Buts" and "Ors" in that statement so... yeah...

Get involved in your primaries and support and work for real Democrats.

Let the GOP start the new party. They will be the "thinking conservatives", a party doomed to permenant minority, and the "not-so-much thinking conservatives" also doomed to be a permanent yet very vocal minority.

Get rid of the DINO's and enjoy a 30 year Dem majority.

It's really our only option.
Short of revolution, which I absolutely do not want, changing DC from the inside out is the ONLY way to affect positive change for the people.

Well it's not a terrible idea; but unless we can get some structural change into the party itself; that is, take some actual ownership over it ourselves - I don't know that we'll ever get rid of the DINOs.

Primaries are definitely a good way to go; but we also need to create some genuine structural changes within the party.

I'm just not quite sure how we'll pull that off though.

Still, it's a starting point.

For democracy to work the electorate has to be engaged and willing to fight for it. I like the sound of your idea, but we must change the way elections are funded to truly enact the kind of change that is so often promised but never enacted.

Bernie Sanders explains it very well in his unfiltered video titled "Who Owns Congress?"
http://sandersunfiltered.com/

True that, true that.

................just vote out all incumbants. PUKIE, DINO OR dIM

But it the placebo effect works for you, by all means. Let's keep electing Dems and get GOP policies in return. At some point the whole crying wolf runs out of steam.

"So what do we do, turn everything back over to the republicans? Isn't that like cutting off your nose to spite your face?"

It's not just republicans, it's also democrats (like Baucus and many others) who are on the corporate payroll.

Funny thing is that teabaggers are against government, just for the wrong reasons.

We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces sayin' whiskey for my men, beer for my horses

)O(

Lauren Wasson, 23, of Garfield, was charged with obstruction of highways and aggravated assault.

she was moving along as ordered, until that fat lunk loser shoved her from behind with his club without warning . . So who committed assault here?

Obama? Yeah Mr. Prez hello?

WTF!
That cop needs to be arrested!
How about some goddamn justice for the PEOPLE?
Obama? Ya listenin?

.....be President right now.

He would get my vote.

Mine, too. But wouldn't it be fun to see what would happen if Barney Frank was elected?

Aah, the things they'd say on faux!

I'd damn sure vote for them.
Though, Frank would be sorely missed in the Senate.

from Mass.

No, more than likely he would not take the nomination from Obama, but what kind of a shock to the system would this be? One impressive showing in a primary and the president is reminded who brought him to the dance. And Dean is in the perfect position to act as such a foil, as he has no other political obligations and duties to distract him.

[Comment Deleted By Administration For Violation Of Terms Of Service]

... that the ultimate decider of their political future will be the voters, not the moneybags.

Alas, if only it were true. One third of eligible voters don't. The rest get to choose between candidates preselected, financed and endorsed by the corporate power structure.

RN used to argue that things probably needed to get a lot worse before Americans started to vote for those things that were best for them and for America. He was trying to make the point that a vote for Nader was not a wasted vote because it would wake up the progressives, even if it put Republicans in charge.

Frankly, if we don't get a vibrant public option, I may not vote in 2010, and I absolutely won't send any more money to Democrats.

Why not vote?

VOTE SOCIALIST OR GREEN.

)O(

Then they'll be usurped by the powers that be in their turn.

I suspect killing the public option would be a tipping point with no return for most Americans. Its all rather obvious already the politicians dont give a rats ass about average Americans already but this will wake even more up and perhaps they will get their fat asses off the couch and start to affect change you really can believe in. Obama is just another globalist stooge. Sad but apparently true.

Expect a major distraction when the time comes to tell Americans they have been had again. Probably another losing expensive war in Iran or the Swine Flu ( or vaccines ) running amuck and killing folks. Huff PO has an article that banks are selling more risky derivatives than even last year. Bend over folks.... What happened to Obamas pledge to regulate these assholes ?

Silly. Ideals are for the candidates the MSM tells us are "unelectable" in the first week of primaries.

Change starts with each and every individual.

Defund corporations, refuse to own stocks or buy private health insurance. Vote with your dollars - not for corporations but for your local economy.

I don't care if it costs twice as much to buy soap at the local store than it does to buy it at Walmart/KMart/Costco, the local store will put 85% of that money back into the local economy. The big box store will rape and pillage your community and send 75% of the money to corporate headquarters where it will be used to fund political candidates who will happily rape and kill Americans for the profit of their benefactors.

I hated to vote for the straight Democratic ticket last time, but I felt that they had the best chance at dislodging those Pukes from office.

Vote for Greens or Socialists = Repukes win

Vote for Democrats = Repukes out of office but spineless Democrats roll over, play dead.

Oh, crap.

either way. I might as well vote with my conscience next time.

Vote Socialist or Green and keep at it.

Never go back to vote Republicrat.

Eventually the tide will turn.

True...but Alice...can the planet survive that long?
Can this nation survive that long?

No

We are finished. The die is cast.

We will have economic collapse within ten years.

We will have ecological collapse soon after that.

Peak energy, peak ecology, peak everything.

The multi quadrillionaires will be behind their fortress walls.

I think you are being a little optimistic Alice ? A lot of experts say the death of the US Dollar is imminent. Iran is pulling off the US buck ( hence the war drums from the usual suspects ) and Japans new PM ran on the promise to get out from under the buck too. US is paying 420 + million a day in interest alone on its debt. Its unsustainable.I laugh at those suckered in by the crap that recovery is ongoing because Wall Street is managing. Where are the real jobs ?

I said WITHIN, which includes possibly tomorrow morning.

One indicator doesn't tell you enough. Everyone goes short on the dollar and then it has a rally.

There are a number of things conspiring to bring us down. It is debt that will do it.

When the Fed needs to raise interest rates, they will not be able to withstand the political heat.

$420 billion will balloon out of sight or debasement of the currency will mushroom which will have the same effect.

The corrupt corporate structure and industrial military complex aided by the Federal government has brought this country to it's knees and they know it. As far as they're concerned all they have left to do is swing the machete and move on to the next available victim.

Watching the debate on Rockefeller's Amendment for the Public Option in the Senate Finance Committee. I swear Grassley is a direct descendent of the children of the corn.

The Supremes are about to turn the election process over to the corporations. If you think voters don't matter to them now, just wait for what's coming. WE ARE SO SCREWED!!!

need to be screaming about this... like a banshee's howl!!! For chrissakes, this is how the effing' elite stay on top of the used-to-be-middle class and the way-more-than-there-used-to-be-lower class.

I mean I know they can...but if they do, then the last vestiges of this Democracy will be gone...
WTF can we do to stop this bullshit?!

I recommend Bruce Dixon's Why the Public Option is Doomed To Fail, and What Can Be Done About It… here, to clarify the confusion over this PUBLIC OPTION.

I see three possibilities:

1 - The Congress passes a shitty health care package mandating purchase of lame policies from private insurers who will make bundles from the millions of additional government subsidized suckers to their swindle, but there is a ROBUST Public Option which allows anyone to jump from their current lousy policy to buy into the government plan, which costs less and covers more.

This is NOT LIKELY, at all, since THERE IS NO ROBUST PUBLIC OPTION being considered in any of the committees proposals.

However the Left Wing in their Dream Like trance keep dreaming that this is actually what is being considered. The present post continues in that self deception.

It isn't, but IT SHOULD BE. Or better yet, HR 676.

Get Wall Street out of the health insurance business altogether. I would like to get Wall Street out of business altogether but I digress.

2 - The Congress passes a shitty health care package mandating purchase of lame policies from private insurers who will make bundles from the millions of additional government subsidized suckers to their swindle, and there is an equally shitty public option that no one but the poor or the sick can opt into. It will not cover more than a few million folks which is just as well because it costs the same as the private plans and it does not control cost because the insurance companies will not allow it.

This is a possible scenario. It is essentially Obama's plan. The Congress could leave off the shitty Public Option and use some subterfuge like a TRIGGER which would promise that somewhere down the road maybe this shitty option would be invoked. Or they could go with Co-Ops which is another subterfuge.

OR

3 - The Congress could fail to pass anything.

This is a possible scenario.

Somewhere down the road, unless some miracle happens that a REAL ROBUST PUBLIC OPTION comes about, or HR 676 is passed…

Somewhere down the road people will wake up to see that they have been swindled again.

Which is a primary reason that these lame proposals are meant to take so long to go into effect.

It acts a memory cushion.

By January 2013 who will remember.

NOTHING is the best available option at the moment. Any health care legislation that could possibly come out of this government will have more loopholes and qualifications than the federal tax code.

And if NOTHING happens people will justifiably outraged, putting huge pressure on candidates in the next election cycle. This is when we might see real change. Until then I'm just watching in fascination and frustration the absolute corruption that passes for democracy.

HR 676 is the only way to go.

I think you waited too long to enact campaign finance reform forcing all candidates to work with public funding and disallowing corporate interests from bankrolling candidates.

What I don't get is why Obama, who was heavily funded by small donations from individuals, has toed the company line.

...received a lot of money from corporations and the financial industry too...

obama and the dems actually get more money from the economic overlords on wall st than to the GOP.

Data gathered by the Center For Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan Washington group whose opensecrets.org Web site tracks political giving, reckons that the banking-and-investment industry is giving nearly twice as much to Democrats as to Republicans in the 2008 cycle. Based on records from 2007 through January, the center calculates that the Democratic Party has raked in about $15.1 million from employees and political action committees of banks and investment companies, compared to $7.7 million for Republicans. The numbers for March, a traditionally heavy month for campaign fund-raisers, have yet to be reported. In the 2004 cycle, the center said, the campaign cash was more equally distributed, with Republicans hauling in $22 million compared with $19.5 million for Democrats.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1207870929227...

Looks like the Dems are going to have a very short-lived majority. As if we didn't suffer enough under Bush, the Dems are, once again, showing they are the party of surrender and defeat.

I am subject to an inferior class of deputized citizen who at will may beat, gas or shoot me for my own good.

(I don't believe that Tom Jefferson, or any of his contemporaries would have agreed)

"Medicare is on the way of a financial meltdown..."

If Medicare taxes had been raised at the same rate as insurance premiums, there would be a huge surplus in Medicare, nor even counting the $billions that were siphoned off by the General Fund and never repaid.

is in the medicare advantage plans that is a huge gift to insurance companies.

.

)O(

How many medics do you have to squeeze to get medicaid?

... I don't make it from scratch, only buy the already made stuff,

we don't get it, do we? we are not important to the big washington money people. obama and company know that while the campaign money keeps flowing into the democratic coffers, they will win elections and they don't need us common folk. as long as they have that campaign cash not going to GOP candidates, they will win. They don't care about us common folk. we aren't important. they can pass sum bs health care legislation that only favors their donors and we get mad and nothing changes. what threat are we to obama? none. he will hold office as long as he doesn't do anything against the big money people.

It was all one big lie

Yes We Can . . . blah blah

public, why even bother to vote?

.... but they still have to count the votes.

Hatch just spent 15 mintues demonizing the government.

Isn't he a part of the government?

So, he's a demon, right?

Sweet Jeebus!

is the first thing that comes to mind.

i can only speak for myself: if the dems continue to govern like a GOP-lite/corporatist party then my votes will be going elsewhere. and i will actively work against the dems in my area. sorry.

although i have little hope, i wish the dems would pull their heads out of their asses and govern as they promised to, and stop selling out the progressives/base. i would be proud to vote for that party.

Fool me once…

Fool me twice…

ETC.

Does the public option cover backlash?

to begin with. It was bread and circus to keep the masses bamboozled.

It's a pile of shite cobbled together by insurance company lobbyists, aided by bought and paid for legislators who have no interest in the well being of their constituents, and by extension, the well being of the country.

The Public Option is bullshit, brought to you by people who hate America.

the end of the Democratic Party on the national level, then yes, I agree with Dr. Dean.

Maybe they think they can win elections without their base. I don't know. But I do know if they pass any legislation without the Public Option, they'll find out that they can't!

I think 2012 will be the "perfect storm" for a third party. Someone mention Barney Frank, or why not Howard Dean, who has some experience at running for Prez. He was totally f&^! by the Dem machine and the MSM for the "out of control yell". Hell I thought it was a great, he showed some life instead of the robotic Gore. I think Bernie Sanders would also make an excellent candidate.

the third party will be made up of "moderates" from both parties. It will be led by people like LIEberman, Snowe, Baucus, etc...

the usual cast of Characters.

... they are moderates. Split will come from one of the fringes. I've got my money on the Glen Beck bunch of crazies.

They're going to run the Palin/Beck ticket.
*

you have to overcome the (irrational) fear in many voters mind that somehow a "third" party is un-American.

Then get active in primaries and force the DINO's out.

Much easier than starting up a new party. Chances of getting a third party candidate elected are slim and do you think congress would copoporate with a third party. I don't.

So=called "moderates" and "Centrists" would leave from both parties, citing too much partisanship and go so far as to call their party the Centrist Party.

?

)O(

That's E Nygma's apathetic youngest son.

("Whatever, dad...[eyeroll])"

So we end up with another batch of spineless "real Democrats." Then what?

There is always a "next election" for the Dems isn't it? First they needed the houses back, they got them. Then they needed the white house, they have it now. And now, gee wiz they need "real dems." I am sure next time it will be that they need "real real Dems."

Ain't it the damned truth?!

What is your suggestion?

Not all Dems in Congress are spineless. Too many are, but there are some very good ones too.

Please stop equating you not liking other people's solutions, with them not providing solutions. What some of you engage on is something similar to have a debate in which you plug your ears with your fingers while saying "niah niah I can't hear you" and then blame people of not participating in the debate.

)O(

What's that you say?

The Europeans outside of the Brits have multi party governance.

This is Matt Yglesias on the German elections here

Consensus comes through coalitions. Anyone that runs amuck breaks the coalition. In Germany previously it was Christian Democrats and the Social Democrats in the Grand Coalition. Thus a center left government.

That proved to be a bad thing for SDU who lost a lot of ground to the Greens and the LEFT, which is the real left. The old communists.

Meanwhile the FDP, which is for the Fat Cats, gained ground. The CDU is joining with them for a Center Right coalition, but with less than 50% which will be quite a trick.

The FDP will want to cut taxes for the rich, but the CDU will resist and probably have a failed government.

The Brits have three parties but like us, a two party tyranny.

The time has passed for us, that two parties can work.

The only work they do is for their corporate masters.

PERIOD

... Germany's coalition is considered center-right. At least that is how Mrs. Merkel has sold her cabinet as being.

The CDU is center right. The FDP is right, business.

The new coalition is center right.

I suppose it was previously center right, Merkel was the Chancellor after all but the SDP was second only by a thin hair.

Merkel et al were billing their cabinet as center-right. That is among other things why the SPD lost further ground in this year's election.

That is what I said.

What is your problem?

Even so it is to the left of anything we have.

you were claiming that the great coalition was center-left. When it has been considered center-right. that is why a lot of SPD voters got jaded enough to jump ship this past elections.

You are correct that even their current cabinet is to the left of whatever we have. But then again, the supposedly "liberal" party in our country, the Dems. Would most likely be considered moderate conservative anywhere in Europe. I have always found the shift to the right this country took in the past 3 decades to be rather alarming.

The shift will be the end of us all.

Except for the multi quadrillionaires who will be in their fortresses.

however, the shift is still troubling.

Heck some of the posters in this site who identify themselves as "progressive/liberal" would be appalled if they were to see what a real leftist political platform looks like. So it is a tad depressing when the "left" in this country is made up of centrists or right out moderate conservatives.

We need you more than ever, man.

I voted for you in the Florida primaries even though the media had already killed you off (the "scream" and all that) cause you were the man then and you're the man now.

I'll vote for you next time up.

Come on, Howard, the country needs you.

.

..

..

.

...

trying to "figure it out".

The only problem is that there are three amendments adding the public option being introduced as well as Conrads co-ops. Will they all vote for one amendment or another, but never in numbers to pass any single one? I wonder.
Vote them all out.

Unfortunately we constituents also pay way too much attention to the special interests. Or rather, we pay a hell of a lot of attention to the ads that they finance.

Talk about understatement: if Congress passes a bill without a public option there is going to be a lot more than a huge backlash.

He's right.

The bill does nothing. Get ready to rumble.
*

What's the difference? The Republicans and Blue Dogs seem to be running the show anyhow. If there's no public option, I simple will not vote...period. I'm tired of supporting people who once they get into office forget about the promises they made while campaigning.

The Democrats will not get another penny from me. They may as well just get all their money from corporations and lobbyist, since that's who they obviously think about when they formulate their legislation.

Health Care is their last chance to get it right, as far as I'm concerned...if they don't...then buh-bye!

the senate finance committee just rejected the public option. let's organize to get those pols out of office.

Time to implement the voters' new-kew-lar option:
Vote out everyone who voted for death and disease for humans in order to make non-humans richER. I include the corporate rapists who have invested in "representatives" and have raped a huge profit.

These industries already have death boards(of directors) who control the life and death of millions of humans. Too expensive to pay for on your own? They dance on your grave. If the payout for expensive medical care cuts into the rapists profits, you're dropped ASAP. And then they dance on your grave.
If they're in a frisky mood, they'll rape you grave to steal gold fillings or anything else they like from the box they put you in. In all fairness, they're just trying to recoup any of the money they paid out to you before they shit-canned you. Gotta protect that bottom line and those holy profits. If some riff-raff has to die, sobeit. They were poor after all, and by definition, losers.

EPN

Health care, like most of our current problems, is presently structured to be insoluable. It simply cannot happen in a society where there is a such a huge gap between a small caste of the rich and the rest, and a terrifying abyss between the shrinking middle class and a growing underclass of workers who make minimum wage-- or less. Of course minimum wage jobs more and more come with no benefits. We're in a race to the bottom. Many of the working poor make less per year at two jobs put together than the amount a corporation that offers health insurance benefits pays to insure each middle class salaried worker and his/her family.
A significant number of doctors and administrators are among the rich-- and the middle class realizes that paying these rich people to take care of the health needs of poor people will cost THEM: in taxes, or reduced benefits, or the continued shrinking of the purchasing power of Medicare and Social Security. The lower class can't pay: the top class won't, and has the power to defeat legislation that would force them to. So the middle class quite rightly fears that any attempt to "cover" the uninsured will make the rich richer and push them further down towards the humiliation and insecurity and blame associated with being poor. The right is tapping into those (justifiable) fears, and the Democrats can not counter with the only prospect that makes sense -- a vigorous redistribution of resourses in the interest of minimizing inequality-- e.g. "Socialism".
We have exploited mimimun wage workers-- especially African Americans, because New Deal and post WWII social safety net was deliberately designed so that the sort of jobs nonwhites had access to would fall through the cracks-- and the less than minimum wage workers who come here on visas or illegally--- for generations, letting them die here un-cared for or with some attention by pro-bono professionals; or encouraging them to go for care to countries where doctors and nurses make salaries that are proportional to what these workers are "worth". Until we can figure out a way to use "all people are created equal and (should be) endowed with certain rights that include food, shelter, education and basic health care" as a measure of "worth" and a policy guide, we will continue in this death spiral.

121 comments

Login or Register to post comments.