Frank Schaeffer: Bachmann's Christianity Radical Even for Evangelicals
For anyone not already familiar with Frank Schaeffer, I posted this interview back in 2009 just after Schaeffer came out with his book, Crazy for God -- Frank Schaeffer, Author of "Crazy for God" on What's Left of the GOP: Today the Republican Party is rooting for doom. Schaeffer has a new book out, this time focusing on his mother rather than his father as the previous book did and MSNBC's Richard Lui brought him on to discuss the current crop of GOP presidential candidates and whether Michele Bachmann or Rick Perry should he get in, would actually have a chance at winning the nomination.
Schaeffer didn't pull any punches when explaining that Michele Bachmann's radical right-wing religious beliefs are too far to the right even for most evangelical Christians and that the more voters get to know about her, the less likely the chances of her winning the nomination. I'd say I agree with him, but of course that relies on our corporate media doing their jobs, which we know they won't unless we see a whole lot more interviews like this one. Schaeffer also did a great job of explaining how none of them actually care about the social issues other than to use them to dupe religious voters into supporting them so they can go serve their real masters after they get in office.
Rough transcript below the fold.
LUI: Frank, so, you know, as Americans and really Republican primary voters get to know Michele Bachmann a little bit more each and every week, will her faith be an asset going forward, do you think, to the election or a liability here?
SCHAEFFER: It will be a liability with the general public when they learn how radical she is. She comes from a wing of the evangelical movement where takes the Bible literally, and that includes the old testament that has passages about stoning gay people to death and all the rest of it. And, of course, Michele Bachmann, like Sarah Palin and others on the far religious right is too politically savvy to express clearly what she believes.
But the fact of the matter is, the part of Christianity she comes from is radical even for evangelical Bible believers. And so I think- I think gradually, it will become apparent to American voters that she could not win the general election. And Republicans are going to have to make a choice to either be a normal political party or, really, theocracy in waiting with people like Michele Bachmann, who in the best of all possible worlds, as far as she would see it, would produce a theocracy in the country where the Bible would be paramount and no longer the Constitution or the Bill of Rights.
LUI: As we see the Tea Party energy continuously grow in the GOP, do you find that in the primary then that she will have some attraction, that she will generate a lot of momentum?
SCHAEFFER: Yeah. I mean, you know, you mentioned my book Sex, Mom and God and one of the things I talk about in that book is charting the course of the religious right from their beginnings in the 1970s with the anti-abortion movement that my family had something to do with, to the present. And the fact of the matter is they have always engaged in these culture war topics when it comes to primary voters, this small core of hard right religious voters and then they have to change later.
But you've got to understand something, and that is that Michele Bachmann and the others on the far right of the Republican Party have moved the whole party so far right that they are no longer normal political party. They are out of the mainstream to the extent that she represents a fringe. The problem is that fringe controls the nomination process in the primaries and you have to understand that the liability they run is that when the general public gets a look at this, they are going to run a long way away. So that's the bind they are in, appeal to the fringe in the primaries or the general population.
LUI: Now, Frank, your father was a writer, a theologian; Bachmann or the Bachmann family, reportedly, looking towards his writings.
SCHAEFFER: Right.
LUI: So there is some link here, at least to your family's background, and you self-describe yourself as one of the founders of the religious right, to what she's thinking and what she's doing today.
SCHAEFFER: Yeah. And I got out obviously, and the story of why I got out in Sex, Mom & God is very clear. But, I came to understand that these people actually hate the United States as it is. Look, they love a fictional, Christian America that wouldn't include gay people, would not have choice and abortion rights for women and all the rest of this. But in terms of the real America, inclusive, diverse, sustaining of gay people as well as heterosexuals and so forth, this is an America they despise and that's why they talk in terms of taking it back. Well from whom? That would be from the rest of us, ordinary American citizens under the rule of law.
LUI: But Frank, hate is a pretty strong word here. These certainly are citizens of the United States and so far given what they have said and done...
SCHAEFFER: Sure.
LUI: ...have not expressed hatred towards the United States.
SCHAEFFER: Well, you know when you mentioned her husband talking about gay people being barbarians and if you look, for instance at Sarah Palin's family, they've had a lot to do with the secessionist movement in Alaska. You're not part of a movement that says it wants to secede from the union in the United States if you like this country. Folks like Michele Bachmann wrap themselves in the flag, but when push comes to shove, their religious values, theocratic values, they are not talking about the same America the rest of us are looking at.
And the irony is of course when they get elected or they get famous in their politics, when Republicans actually come into office, the only people they actually serve is Wall Street, and so really these social issues are a red herring because they may get the votes of a certain portion of America, mostly white, middle and lower middle class Americans in the evangelical wing of Christianity, but when they get into national office what happens?
It's all about tax cuts for the wealthy, defunding education, narrowing the public space. That's what the real program is and unfortunately they take advantage of a lot of well-meaning people who vote for them on social issues they care passionately about. When they get into power, it's all about Wall Street and you know, they wouldn't let the kind of people vote for them caddy for them on their golf link.
LUI: Frank, we have got to go, but I do want to mention Rick Perry because we've had the introduction very quickly. He also has support from the religious right, from the conservative right. Would he not be a good possibility here to move towards the primary?
SCHAEFFER: Well loo, any guy that starts a national run by calling a prayer meeting and mixing the issues of church and state as he has in Texas is someone who has his eye on this little group. But I say one more time just before we go. It's total hypocrisy because these people know that group helps them win the primary but when the Republicans get into office it's about serving corporate Wall Street interests. It has nothing to do with the social agenda they get elected on so it's a scam, but it's a scam that keeps working. Forty years of Republican domination of the American political process based on abortion, gay rights, these other things they wave around, but actually it's really about corporate America.



lmao
a few more wives to bolster his creds
...wall st. interests once they're elected; the dems do a fine job of it too without wrapping themselves in religious cloth.
Mickey: "It was an epiphany. Do you know what an epipany is?"
Keoni: "NOT NOW MICKEY!"
The Dems just wrap themselves in populist cloth instead.
Sometimes I wish we had more parties, or at least more alternatives. But I suspect they'd corrupt just as easily as what we have now - so we'd have more Wall Street puppets, wrapping themselves in different cloths.
Our government needs a major course correction. Its future depends on just who brings it to them...
"In a round of decades, three stages stand out in a loop,
A slump, then war, then peel back to square one and back for more." - Stereolab
regardless of what the Dem/GOP fear machine may have you believe.
CTHULHU 2012 "Why vote for a lesser evil?"
... but let's be realistic, rare is the third-party candidate that makes any real splash when both parties are running candidates. Our system is nominally pluralistic, but two of that plurality have worked wonders with keeping themselves the only two that have a realistic shot.
"In a round of decades, three stages stand out in a loop,
A slump, then war, then peel back to square one and back for more." - Stereolab
SCHAEFFER: Well, you know when you mentioned her husband talking about gay people being barbarians and if you look, for instance at Sarah Palin's family, they've had a lot to do with the secessionist movement in Alaska. You're not part of a movement that says it wants to secede from the union in the United States if you like this country. Folks like Michele Bachmann wrap themselves in the flag, but when push comes to shove, their religious values, theocratic values, they are not talking about the same America the rest of us are looking at.
And the irony is of course when they get elected or they get famous in their politics, when Republicans actually come into office, the only people they actually serve is Wall Street, and so really these social issues are a red herring because they may get the votes of a certain portion of America, mostly white, middle and lower middle class Americans in the evangelical wing of Christianity, but when they get into national office what happens?
It's all about tax cuts for the wealthy, defunding education, narrowing the public space. That's what the real program is and unfortunately they take advantage of a lot of well-meaning people who vote for them on social issues they care passionately about. When they get into power, it's all about Wall Street and you know, they wouldn't let the kind of people vote for them caddy for them on their golf link.
In a contest of crazy nobody wins and everybody loses.
"I know that there are people who do not love their fellow
man, and I hate people like that! " ~ Tom Lehrer (1928 - )
With Perry and/or Bachmann in the White House, both the Collective and the Family will be running the show.
I'll be considering a one-way ticket to Europe with that scenario.
The book of the year...
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0058KSKHW
And Romney pissed because he knows he can't go there.
Bush II was a big Jesus guy, what happened there? Right...
It amazes me that in the 21st Century a majority of people in this country think the person occupying the most powerful position in the world has to pray/talk to an invisible being in the sky, and, worse, make decisions based on what is perceived as the answer.
I never thought Obama would get elected - that the US had not progressed enough. I wonder how long it will be before an avowed athiest can get elected?
I've seen some stuff, man. And some thangs...
"none of them actually care about the social issues other than to use them to dupe religious voters into supporting them so they can go serve their real masters after they get in office " , that's been obvious for some time now , to everyone but the stooges who vote strictly on abortion and gay marriage . It's the carrot on the stick routine , the jackasses voting Republican in order to get that carrot will never get it , it'll be kept right in front of their noses , just out of their reach , meanwhile they're picking your pockets , robbing you and the country blind , enriching their rich friends , dividing and destroying this country . When Bush and the Republicans had full control , absolute power , what did they do on these issues ? Nothing . LOL . The Bushies were laughing at and mocking the fools ! If they want to win just vote Obama , sounds like our savior is about to do for the Republicans what the Republicans themselves could never do , cut social security and medicare !
"The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all."
My girlfriend who dated in the computer Christian networks said most dates asked her if she would "submit" to the male decision-making within the family. Bachmann is the GOP's vision of the ideal woman; Barbie-like looks, Barbie-like brain with a husband pulling the strings. I'd like to think the US has moved past the Christo-fascist movement in the US and will not elect her President.
Right? You'd think their deity would be Odin, Ares, Mars, or Satan. You know, control freak war gods. Not that hippie kid who said lets all get along and then got strung up on a cross.
The Christian god had a really bad case of the "itchy trigger finger," before he had his kid. His body count alone could give a run for their money to Odin, Ares, and Satan combined.
CTHULHU 2012 "Why vote for a lesser evil?"
True. I forgot about his flood, among other things.
Too bad about the Abrahamic god's no show during the whole Holocaust, his chosen people could have most definitively used some of his old gentile-smiting magic then, or at least some mana.
CTHULHU 2012 "Why vote for a lesser evil?"
A true atheist has no need to boost his own stance by provoking believers with blasphemy. Truth demands something more than patronizing respect for religion or the intellectually lobotomized affirmation of religious pluralism and relativism.
tl;dr
trolls.
Barbie-like looks, Barbie-like brain with a Deeply closted,self hating Gay husband pulling the strings.
"Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing." -- Robert E. Howard
I wonder if Marcus Bachmann, Michelle's main squeeze and plantation boss-man is related to Sloboden Milosevic, the former Youoslav President who died while waiting in The Hague, to be tried for Crimes against Humanity?
Shucks, they could have been separated at birth!
http://www.milkintheclock.com/tag/slobodan-mi...
Red Dawg
Theology is the current, ultimate refuge of the career scoundrel or criminal. Theology guarantees that the ambitious mob leader gets the lowest common denominator as his constituency, a desirable goal since they never question or research, as long as you can quote the appropriate verse of the mob's Assholy Book. In the case of Christianity, Jesus directed his mob to pay Caesar and Paul told them that government is appointed by God, assuring its patronage by tyrants. Genuine sociopaths insist on fundamentalism as a drug test for their opiate--it's not necessary to actually believe in virgin birth, even Jesus called himself the Son of Man, but you'd darned well better say you believe in it. Christian? I doubt it--the Antichrist himself owns these creeps, lock stock and barrel.
Once you have a mob, directing it is easy. Just as many bullies misleadingly call their targets gay for the sole purpose of getting the mob to allow them the violence or theft they crave, political targets may be guiltless of anything except espousing individual liberty, or owning something the mob or leader covets. In this case, majority rule really is two wolves and a lamb voting on lunch--when the majority is dumbed down, craven cowards joining the mob to avoid being scapegoated, or opportunists looking to rise to the top of the toilet bowl.
It's a sorrowful day when women have no ERA, few good office-holders, but plenty of crooks equal to the most despicable of male candidates.
the notion that conservatives ONLY serve corporate interests is false...just look at all the states enacting anti-choice laws...anyone who actually follows this stuff knows how much religion is inserted into politics and policy...check out www.au.org and www.ffrf.org for more info
the state of religion here in the US is far worse than most people want to notice
we are one supreme court justice away from a theocracy...insist your elected officials keep religion out of policy decisions
The GOP wants to sell us all out to the Corps, but our personal lives and morality, they want a theocracy for.
A return to Lords, Clergy, and serfs. The "Church" (Evangelicals) will control everything the Corporations don't.
"Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing." -- Robert E. Howard
and America is the last bastion. Europe has been walking away from it for some time, while we rush to embrace it.
Them riots, they are having over there, ain't due to the soccer off season.
They are being served the same shit sticks in their menu as we are.
CTHULHU 2012 "Why vote for a lesser evil?"
We're number one!
when it comes to number two!
CTHULHU 2012 "Why vote for a lesser evil?"
That's now two prominent people to say it aloud this week: THE GOP IS NOT A NORMAL PARTY!
Frank Schaeffer in the clip above:
Echos of David Brooks' most recent NY Times column:
Pass it on.
There are some articulate, well educated republican posters here. I can't wait to hear all of their fancy, logically impeccable defenses of the nutjobs in the party that they support. It's going to make for some excellent reading here in the months to come. Imagine being a well educated, christian, life long republican and having to go to bat for THIS team.
Frank nails it but "not normal" hardly covers it. These people are ruthless cold-blooded sociopaths.
Recommend Schaeffer's books Crazy and Sex to everyone you know, through every channel you have. They're that important.
And Naomi Klein's "Shock Doctrine", if you really want to knwo what the GOP is uilt around and what they want to accomplish.
"Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing." -- Robert E. Howard
Thanks. I'll definitely pick up the Klein.
I think what "they" -- the Christian Right that forms the core of the Republican electorate -- want is not a "Christian" America, but more of a Christianist America. They want an America that hates and despises what they hate and despise, and makes laws to enforce their morality. They, of course, get to define what's "Christian", and it's what they are, not necessarily what Christ represented.
What they do not want is a Christian America in the sense of an America that tries to act as Jesus implored people to act. They do not want to heal the sick, feed the hungry, clothe the naked, visit the sick in prison. When given the opportunity to enact laws and policies like universal health care, then suddenly it's all about keeping the government out of our lives.
C'mon Christianists, you had an opportunity to make the country more Jesus-like and you said "no". You speak instead of "personal responsibility" and bring up that old quote from "Hezakiah" about "God helps those who help themselves". What you would like is a ban on abortion. You'd like a ban on same-sex marriage. I think you'd be hard-pressed to find Jesus ever mentioning these things.
Guess what I'm gonna do. I'm gonna define what "Christian" is, just like they do. But when I do it, I'm gonna exclude them.
It's an important distinction. Christianists, as you call them, have little to do with Christ.
*Applause*
That is a word I've used consistently to differentiate between those who truly try to live their faith, however much I may disagree with their spiritual perceptions, and those who wear their "faith" on their sleeve and trot it out whenever politically expedient.
In the marketplace of ideas, too many people shop in the bargain basement.
-- Thunder BlueRose
Why, yes, I am a card-carrying member of the ACLU
http://saxman.bravepages.com
a better term is "Teleban." Tele as in "televangelist" and well...you know where the latter half of the word comes from.
Or Christian Dominionists.
to propagate hatred of all minorities.
I just read yesterday that her husband got his PhD on-line. And that he is not licensed to practice psychology in Minnesota. So, what the hell is he doing getting medicare and medicaid money? Sounds like an investigation is in order. At the very least. For a pair of anti-government people they sure do like getting their grubby little mitts on as much government dough as they can.
but some of this staff obviously is. In other words, he and an actual licensed counselor/therapist could "treat" a patient and that would be elligible. As to who can actually practice "psychotherapy" varies by state. A licensed mental health professional/counselor can be something entirely different, but in some states anyone can hang their shingle out as a "therapist." Minnesota obvioulsy allows this and I bet there are actual licensed professionals on his staff to be reimbursement elligible.
I don't know if some "therapies" are actually not covered - no way is curing homosexuality in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders. But they probably just record it as "group behavioral therapy" or some other general term which would be acceptable.
I've seen some stuff, man. And some thangs...
Written in the ...80's? Attwood's Handmaid's Tale was made into a movie (which I never watched); I think Natasha Richardson may have played the handmaid.
It's quite an interesting read, in that it describes a pretty ...FREAKY... theocracy governed USA. Chilling. Moreso these days.
ps: forget Europe. Canada or South America are closer. And now that the US is talking 'default', I have to ask: is the US the most powerful country in the world? Has it been for the past 5 years? Honestly??
The right in this country has apparently adopted The Handmaid's Tale as a how-to manual rather than the chilling cautionary saga it is...
In the marketplace of ideas, too many people shop in the bargain basement.
-- Thunder BlueRose
Why, yes, I am a card-carrying member of the ACLU
http://saxman.bravepages.com
Comments are closed on this entry