Fineman: Lieberman Wants Revenge on Those Who Rode Around on the Bus of Democratic Primary Challenger
Howard Fineman pointed out the obvious on Hardball the other day. From BarbinMD at Daily KOS--It's All Your Fault. As she notes, "was there ever any doubt?"
Phoenix Woman as FDL has more--Senator Hissyfit Lets the Mask Slip:
The man who owes his Senate seat to movement Republicans wanting revenge on Lowell Weicker for doing the right thing with regard to Richard Nixon has shown the public the real person behind his mask of unctuous piety and bipartisanship — namely a man so petty he’s willing to go back on his stated support of a position (in this case, Medicare expansion) just because someone he doesn’t like who favors it.
[...]
As HuffPo’s Rachel Weiner notes, this goes a long way toward validating the belief in progressive blogger circles that Lieberman, as the Washington Post’s Ezra Klein put it, “seems primarily motivated by torturing liberals.”
As usual, it's all about Joe and his ego. Sadly anything we "leftie" bloggers do is just going to make him act worse. Here's one idea via Bob Cesca (my apologies for lifting the entire post, but it was a short one):
BooMan has a great idea for dealing with Joe Lieberman.
Maybe we should find out how Lieberman likes to get to work and just go park our cars in the middle of those streets each morning. You know, just because we can.
I have a serious question here: From now on, do we have to support the exact opposite of what we want in order to fake out Joe Lieberman? I mean, I know he sounds like Elmer Fudd, but now we have to outsmart him as if we're in a Bugs Bunny cartoon?
US: Public option!
LIEBERMAN: No public option!
US: No public option!
LIEBERMAN: Public option!
US: Thank you! ZOOM!
Hardball transcript via below the fold.
MATTHEWS: We‘re back. Time for the politics fix, with “Newsweek‘s” Howard Fineman, who is an MSNBC political analyst, and the “Washington Post‘s” Anne Kornblut. Thank you. We‘re awaiting that book. It‘s coming out soon. Good timing, by the way, right after Christmas. Before New Years. We‘re all going to be at the news stands. Lots of cash in people‘s hands that time of year.
Let‘s go with this one—no really, all the gift money, you go buy a book with it. Let‘s talk about this thing with Harry Reid and Lieberman. I call him Joe the Bummer, as in Joe the Plumber, because he‘s brilliantly timing this thing of I‘m not for this; I‘m not for the public option; now I‘m not for the buy-in on age 55. He‘s just killing these guys.
HOWARD FINEMAN: I talked to a spokesman today.
I said, look, I‘m going on HARDBALL; give me your side of the story.
MATTHEWS: Good move.
FINEMAN: OK, their side of the story is, it‘s a principled thing. There are many parts of the bill he believes in. The Medicare buy-in is an add on because there are all these subsidies. The guy gave me a lot of plausible stuff. And I half believe it. I‘m sorry, I half—
MATTHEWS: What‘s the other half of your belief, revenge?
FINEMAN: The other half is personal—not with Obama. Don‘t forget, Obama, the president supported Lieberman in the fight in the party in Connecticut.
MATTHEWS: Oh.
FINEMAN: It‘s the grass roots left of the Democratic party that—
MATTHEWS: -- that enjoyed his torture.
FINEMAN: -- that enjoyed his torture. And this is pay-back to them. Obama‘s caught—excuse me, the president is caught in the middle here. That‘s my take on it.
MATTHEWS: So he wants Markos Moulitsas to take it.
FINEMAN: He wants Kos. He wants Fire Dog Lake. He wants all those people who rode around on—on the bus of the challenger who defeated him in the Democratic primary.
MATTHEWS: Wow. You think this goes back to that defeat in the primary up in Connecticut, where, after all those years in Connecticut politics as a Democrat, he got bumped by the party?
ANNE KORNBLUT: I think Howard makes a really good point. I have two colleagues at the Post, Ezra Klein and Alec McGillis, who have been covering this really closely, who both earlier today made the point that it was hard to find the policy reasoning here behind this. You know, he says it‘s got to make it more expensive. The CBO hasn‘t scored it yet.
MATTHEWS: Especially since he came out for this very proposal three months ago. Luke Russert, Tim‘s son, who works for NBC News now, went out and dug this story up, that three months ago, he came out for exactly the same thing he‘s now saying is unacceptable. He initiated it.
KORNBLUT: More recently than that, even, was cool to the idea, but didn‘t outright oppose it, and, of course, could have blocked it sooner. The timing couldn‘t be worse. It‘s so I think hard to—there‘s absolutely no way to overlook the politics in this, because it‘s driving the liberals crazy. As a result, as Howard points out, it‘s driving the White House crazy.
MATTHEWS: So, as a straight news person, who is not allowed to tell opinion, you can say now, Anne Kornblut, that this is an act of political revenge?
KORNBLUT: I can say there‘s a good case to be made. It sure looks like it.
MATTHEWS: Political observers believe that—
FINEMAN: I consider myself a straight news person too, and I‘m trying to understand the motivation here.
What Lieberman‘s people told me made sense, because they will distinguish the thing from September. They will say that now there‘s subsidies in the bill.
MATTHEWS: Is Joe Lieberman a Democrat or is he an independent completely now?
FINEMAN: He‘s an independent.
MATTHEWS: Is he going to keep the chairmanship of Homeland Security?
FINEMAN: As we speak, there‘s a meeting of Democrats going up on the Hill. My understanding was everybody going in was ready to yell at Joe Lieberman. They‘re not going to kick him out of the room. They‘re not going to say out, because the question somebody said to me is do they want a scapegoat or a bill. They‘ll vent. But they still want his vote in the end.
I don‘t think he thinks of himself as anything other than the one man member of the Lieberman party. That‘s who he is. He may not run again in 2012. He‘s estranged from the base of the Democrats. He‘s off on his own here.
MATTHEWS: It‘s one thing, Anne, to be really tough and to make the Democrats do—basically say heal, dog, heal, and get the Democrats do this bill the way he wants. Is he willing to bring down the house, kill this bill right before Christmas, and be the the guy who does it? Is he willing to do that?
KORNBLUT: We didn‘t think that he would do what he did in the
Connecticut race and he did. He‘s shown nothing but political courage, if
you want, or willingness to buck the party all the way through. I wouldn‘t
it wouldn‘t surprise me all that much if he did.
MATTHEWS: What a story this is.
KORNBLUT: I will say this is expanding now beyond just Democrats yelling at him in the caucus meeting. You have got liberal bloggers and even some Democrats again saying that they don‘t want, especially if he kills this, to be the chairman of the Homeland Security Committee. There‘s been today for his wife to no longer be a global ambassador for the Susan G. Komen Cure for Breast Cancer Foundation, which they said wouldn‘t be. I think this thing is expanding, but you cannot, I don‘t think, overstate the level of anger.
FINEMAN: Those are the same. By the way, those are the same blogs who were out after him in 2006. So this is a continuing fight. And it‘s going end up being more than Lieberman. I don‘t think Joe Lieberman would like to be—as egotistical as he sometimes can be or seem, I don‘t think wants to do this alone. I think if it happens, he sure as heck would like to have Ben Nelson and maybe a couple of others.
I don‘t think the deal is over yet. Despite all the yelling and screaming, it‘s still possible. They‘re holding reconciliation in the background. They don‘t want to mention it. Harry Reid doesn‘t want to mention it, because the moment he mentions or doesn‘t react negatively to the idea of reconciliation, everybody will immediately interpret that for what it is.
MATTHEWS: The left will want it, yes. He‘s saying OK. That is really Armageddon.




To quote Lewis Black...Lieberman is just an angry old Jewish woman.
Vote GOP and move forward to the 18th Century.
corporate shill--At least nelson has a conscience--I do not agree with him and see it as a end run on ROe v.Wade but he will have to live with the results!
If congress had done the job elected to do this would have been done in July..Shameless pandering to the stupid blue dogs and republicans got us in this mess..Where are the Statesmen???
Call the mutt and let him hear your digust 1.800.828.0498!
Where are the Statesmen???
I think they're planning a reunion tour with Pontius Pilate and the Naildrivers.
Vote GOP and move forward to the 18th Century.
:)
What is your conceptual, continuity?
Did he recently get raped? Is he pregnant??
"Egotism is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of Stupidity" - Frank Leahy
I love Lewis Black!
Here is the clip
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-novembe...
He's getting cover from the White House while Howard Dean is getting attacked.
I guess it's just Joe's turn to play the bad guy.
Corruption favors the wealthy.
That will teach dumb Gov. Dean to prostitute his principles and support last week's deal.
He lost credibility with me (so..who cares), he's even further removed from the Democratic Party now.
He's a pariah who prostituted his original principles. The worst kind of pariah.
He should have NEVER backed off from his demand for the public option.
Howard Dean is finished at the national level. Done. Completed.
Vote GOP and move forward to the 18th Century.
What was the deal?
The elimination of the public option and replacement with the Medicare buy in at age 55.
The public option was dropped as you recall. Then Lieberman reneged and said on Sunday he could not vote for the Medicare buy in.
Vote GOP and move forward to the 18th Century.
Lie-berman?
I hate to say it but a Beck post would be more interesting - seriously.
Scrooo Joe.
"I know that there are people who do not love their fellow
man, and I hate people like that! " ~ Tom Lehrer (1928 - )
In order to stick it to us, Joe Lieberman will prove our point. Interesting tactic.
That he knows he can get away with it is what should scare us. In a sane world, he'd be too worried about the next election to act like that.
Everyone is equally entitled to the pursuit of happiness. Wasn't that once self evident?
He knows he is not running the next time his seat is up for election.
Correct, Captain.
This debacle is Lieberman's partying gift to the Democratic Party and to his favorite john, the insurance industry.
Vote GOP and move forward to the 18th Century.
. . . to an insurance concern.
He's not running again, and he's cutting a financial deal for his next gig.
Fair enough. I'll amend my earlier statement.
That he knows he can get away with it is what should scare us. In a sane world, his acting in exactly the manner progressives warned the Party that he would act would come with political repercussions, as Harry Reid -- the guy who said, "I trust him to be with us," -- and other caucus leaders would realize that the progressives were correct, feel betrayed and fear for their own electoral prospects.
Everyone is equally entitled to the pursuit of happiness. Wasn't that once self evident?
Harry Reid is a senile old fool.
His only goal is to suck off the casino lobby enough to be permanently comped once he retires from Congress.
Vote GOP and move forward to the 18th Century.
I'm beginning to think that Lieberman is doing the bidding of the Administration. They're scratching each other's backs. I don't believe for a minute that Obama wanted a public option.
That's becoming more evident as time goes on.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/12/16-2
"Someday somebody related to some of these sufferers, these victims, these collaterally damaged souls, may try to kill you. And I have to tell you, I think you’ll have it coming." - Christopher Cooper
"Obama, the president supported Lieberman in the fight in the party in Connecticut."
Factually incorrect. Obama supported Lamont.
"I know that there are people who do not love their fellow
man, and I hate people like that! " ~ Tom Lehrer (1928 - )
I thought Obama supported LIEberman against Lamont in the primary but supported Lamont a in the main election.
So did Boxer. This was in the primaries. I forget what happened next. But Boxer pissed me off doin it. I let her have it too.
A whole bunch of the good old boys and girls club stumped for him.
I seem to recall something about Joe being Obama's mentor.
Correct me if I'm wrong on that one.
What is your conceptual, continuity?
I'm not sure why we bother but . . .
"Especially since he came out for this very proposal three months ago. Luke Russert, Tim‘s son, who works for NBC News now, went out and dug this story up, that three months ago, he came out for exactly the same thing he‘s now saying is unacceptable. He initiated it."
Luke Russert credited someone else and was not the guy "digging" things up.
But since facts never matter to Tweety . . .
From NBC's Luke Russert - (Hat tip: Greg Sargeant at the Plum Line).
"I know that there are people who do not love their fellow
man, and I hate people like that! " ~ Tom Lehrer (1928 - )
"Yes we can!
No you can't
Yes we can!
No you can't
Yes we can!
No you can't
No we can't
Yes you can!
There. Fixed.
"Someday somebody related to some of these sufferers, these victims, these collaterally damaged souls, may try to kill you. And I have to tell you, I think you’ll have it coming." - Christopher Cooper
is just one of the very worst examples of what is wrong with the Senate and the government in general: it is populated with self-serving, sanctimonious, sociopaths who have no intention of performing their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution and represent the People.
Nothing will change unless we insist that it does.....and voting is probably not going to be the weapon of choice.
"Egotism is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of Stupidity" - Frank Leahy
Voting is critical to changing the system. Public Campaign Financing needs to be one of the major policy shifts. This is the only way to help ensure not only rich people can run for office and have a chance. The system has to fundamentally be changed or the only kind of legislation expected in the future will be legislation in favor of corporations.
If this was something that would be good for israel, lie-berman would have voted for it in a second.
... I wonder how they can afford it, but we can't.
Corruption favors the wealthy.
Heh heh. Do you REALLY want to know.
Vote GOP and move forward to the 18th Century.
As VP Lieberman would have been out of the Senate and muzzled.
I'd pay good money to slap Lie-berman in both his droopy jowls.
Can I do it if I donate to a good cause?
My two nieces in CT have to grow up without health coverage because my brother dropped work-provided insurance on himself and his family in order to keep food on the table.
I'm so glad I no longer live in CT... and wish they would move.
why he thinks it's okay for the USer treasury to finance universal health-care in Israel, but not in the USofA?
Ohh...so many comments...so many potential reasons to ban me.
Vote GOP and move forward to the 18th Century.
Good For Israel.
Thanks a lot Connecticut, fir gifting us with this POS.
If you gave Elmer Fudd some quaaludes and put him in a suit, then yes, maybe Lieberman would sound like him. But Fudd was resouceful, passionate in speech and belief, and never, ever waivered.
It is simple - Joe sold his soul to AIPAC which largely helped him defeat Lamont to remain in the senate. Lieberman was an attack dog for John McCain's foreign policy views and staunch defender of Israel no matter what.
Lieberman's actions have everything to do with Obama -
Baack in 2008 - Lieberman argued that Obama was putting the blame for Iran's rise in the Middle East on America's doorstep, pushing the argument that the Iraq war had strengthened Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's standing in the region and left Israel less secure.
"If Israel is in danger today it is not because of U.S. foreign policy, which has been strongly supportive of Israel in every way," he said. "It is not because of what we have done in Iraq. It is because Iran is a fanatical, terrorist, expansionist state and has a leader and a leadership that constantly threatens to extinguish the state of Israel."
Recall that one of the few times Obama has publicly shown more emotion than usual -
During a Senate vote during that time period, Obama dragged Lieberman by the hand to a far corner of the Senate chamber and engaged in what appeared to reporters in the gallery as an intense, three-minute conversation.
Joe Lieberman is just another Renfield, but it's Harry Reid that is letting Lieberman call the shots.
Why, Harry?
Reid, if he himself was not a Renfield, would have dumped Lieberman from all committees the moment he was elected as a non-Democrat.
How many more Renfields are in congress, scuttling and drooling every time an all-mighty industry lobbyist tosses a sheckle or a bug on their office floor?
We should all chant, "Renfield! Renfield!" every time we see these sycophant slaves. Will they get the hint? Of course not; their masters pay them well not to understand.
I supported Ned Lamont financially and would do so again...
It isn't Joe...he's the handy dandy skapegoat...
This is all Rahm & the DLC...and their insufferable stupidity/greed
We don't inherit the Earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children - Native American proverb
If being cold means there's no such thing as global warming, does being full mean there's no such thing as world hunger?
"Revenge is sweetest to those with the narrowest of minds."
It's been my sense for a while that Lieberman is being motivated by spite. He's angry about being rejected by the Dems, and wants revenge. It's that simple.
As a lifelong armchair psychologist (mainly novels, the movies, my legal work) I must say I think it should be obvious to all that this man is pathetic. Sen.
LiarmanLieberman has some sort of perverted Messianic complex and is in fact exhibiting the onset of acute schizophrenia. He reminds me a bit of the ventriloquist in that weird suspense movie with Anthony Hopkins. Just like Lieberman, his dummy had taken over his thinking. We are not really witnessing the Real Joe Lieberman now, but his dummy."Respect for the rights of others is peace." --Benito Juarez
Comments are closed on this entry