Eric Cantor on the GOP's Nonexistent Plan for Health Care Reform
Chris Wallace asks Eric Cantor just why the public should trust Republicans more than Democrats to be looking out for the voters' interests, and specifically on the issue of health care reform, and Cantor brings up their "listening tour" and again, doesn't give an ounce of specifics about just what their plan is.
WALLACE: So how does the GOP turn around that public perception, “Yeah, we’ve got doubts about the Democrats. We’ve got even more doubts about Republicans?”
CANTOR: Well, the bottom line is Republicans need to demonstrate that we’ve got the solutions for the issues that face American families today.
Barack Obama promised that he would not raise taxes on working families. Well, they just did that last week with the cap and trade vote. They’re about to do it this week and next with the health care vote.
All we’re talking about now is how are we going to pay for these gargantuan government programs, and really not only to no effect to address the current problem but to make matters worse.
So the Republican Party does have a plan. We are proffering solutions to these very difficult economic problems. What we’re also doing is we’re launching national efforts to go about this country, to engage a discussion with the American people about how our solutions work better for them in these economic times.
WALLACE: All right. But let’s talk about health care reform, because actually, the plan that’s coming out of the House, among House Democrats, is not to tax the middle class. In fact, they’re proposing a $550 billion tax increase on the rich, on anyone making over $280,000 a year. What’s wrong with that?
CANTOR: Well, really, the big issue, I think, surrounding health care is, number one, do you -- do you believe that the government can actually be the one taking over the system and providing the type care that we have.
But number two, how are you going to pay for it? And you’re right. Charlie Rangel is poised to announce this incredible half a trillion dollar tax on folks making over $200,000 a year.
But if you look at who that is, half of those people derive their income from small businesses. Half of those people are the ones making the decision as to whether to hire Americans or not. So again, why would we be going into the direction of saying to business owners, “I’m going to take yet even more from you to make it more difficult for you to hire the Americans who are now out of work?”
WALLACE: Congressman, do you believe that every American should have health insurance?
CANTOR: I believe that we ought to certainly put out there as a goal that everyone should have access to health insurance coverage, absolutely.
We ought to make sure that we create a system where you can hold costs down and provide access to a basic plan for all Americans that are out there and can do so.
WALLACE: So how would you get those -- you know, you say a goal. This has been something that we’ve been talking about for 30 years, 40 years. How would you get that 40, 50 million Americans who are uninsured protected?
CANTOR: Well, I mean, listen. That number of uninsured is always fluid. It’s changing. And a large part of those that are uninsured have to do with the people who are in job transitions, have lost their jobs.
We need to, number one, put in place some flexibility in insurance coverage so that people are protected if they lost their job, that do -- we could say that entrepreneurs who want to go out and start to create their own business and hire people will be protected if we put in some type of self-insured -- self-employed insurance plan, so that people can have access to affordable basic coverage. So we need to expand the ability for them to enter larger risk pools to do that.
But listen. The bulk of the people in this country are insured by their employer. And that’s about 70 percent of the people. We need -- and we need to make sure that those employers stay in the game, and we need to allow them the flexibility so that they can bring down costs.
Government has never demonstrated the ability to do that.





So it's damaging to jobs if government taxes small business, but the republican plan to have small business fund healthcare has no effect? Does the republican plan require employers to provide affordable insurance or is it still only if they feel like it. What about companies that choose insurance plans that are so expensive that the employees can't afford to take it or or such a bad policy that employees would be insane to take it?
How do people who lose their job pay for this insurance while out of work? Does the republican plan require that the previous employer keep paying into it until new employment is found?
is SECRET?
Well, not so much secret as much as NON-EXISTENT!
Okay, okay. It can be revealed here that Their "PLAN", unfortunately, is the very same as the
"OBAMA PLAN (TM)". The very lame "Public Option" will be nothing more than yet another fine
example of Corporate Welfare. It will merely provide minimal health care coverage for that
sector of society that the Health Care Cabal deems unworthy of coverage. The Health Care
Cabal MUST be guaranteed Their obscene profits, made on the backs of nearly ALL taxpayers
(minus the top 2%), in order to cover perhaps one-half of those currently uninsured. That
portion of the financial burden that does not fall on the backs of the Average Joe and jane
will be forced upon Small Business. Count on it!
The rapacious bail-out of the Wall Street Bankers and "Too Big To Fail" Financial Institutions
is about to be repeated with the Health Care Cabal -- Socialized Risk and Privatized Profit.
The proper term is called Corporate Socialism, or as Mussolini called it ... FASCISM.
I am not going to wait for the other parts of this pogrom, which will include euthanasia of
the elderly, those with serious mental disorders (excluding all those fine Republicans and
Blue Dog Democrats), those with life-threatening diseases -- all based upon Malthusian
cost-benefit calculations. I have seen this script before, and it was called Hitler's Third
Reich the last time.
Am I having "Voter's Remorse" at having voted for Obama, the lesser of two evils?
You betcha!
Twwedle-Dee and Tweedle-Dum; there doesn't appear to be any real difference between the
GOP and the mainstream Democrats these days. Of course, since the MSM and the Corporate
Socialists run this country, none of us should have expected that ANY candidate running
would not already have been vetted for their "political correctness".
Glen Beck is a total ass-wipe, but he is nearly correct about a few things -- Obama and Co.
are socialists (National Socialists), and there does, apparently, need to be a populist (Left-
Center, not Bat-Shit Crazy Right) revolution in this country. Near the close of WW-II, the
Italians rose up against El Duce, and hung him from a lamppost. There are plenty of
lampposts in Washington whose looks could only be improved by some new "decorations".
Who will bring the rope?
(Just sayin'.)
Sorry, just letting my mind wander a bit ...
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
-- John F. Kennedy
republicanism is a mental illness!
Nothing more or less. republicans must be crazy, how else can you explain the the thing they do and say?
Comments are closed on this entry