Go Home

Countdown: Prosecuting CIA Torture

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (1094)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (2506)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Keith talks to Harper's Scott Horton about the reports that Attorney General Eric Holder is about to appoint a Special Prosecutor to investigate the CIA for torturing prisoners. Horton has more at Harpers:

Here’s another question. According to the Los Angeles Times, “Officials said it wasn’t clear that any CIA interrogators were ever informed of the limits laid out in the Justice Department memo. ‘A number of people could say honestly, correctly, “I didn’t know what was in it,”‘ said a former senior U.S. intelligence official.” How would that affect the work of a special prosecutor?

The Times piece builds off accounts furnished by “former senior Justice officials,” close to the torture issue, with apparent knowledge of “investigations.” In all likelihood, we’re talking about Bush Administration political appointees apprehensive about what a special prosecutor might uncover. I would strongly discount the claims that the investigations will never go anywhere because of a lack of witnesses and evidence. That conclusion can’t be justified until a serious investigation has actually been conducted—and it’s clear that the Bush Justice Department did not conduct a serious investigation because they were concerned about where it might lead.

Continue reading....

Share This Post

Link To This Post


39 Comments
CoIntelPro.PronktasticlyAgainst.SCLM.E-Voting.Incumbents's picture

won't happen.


Some stuff you can't make up!

JerryHu's picture

Unfortunately I'm with you on this, it's much like the Iraq inquire in the UK, it's a puppet show for the masses.

The criminals that told the other criminals to do it knew they were never going to be touched.

Tis just the way it is.

rosepierre's picture

agreed -- don't waste our time and taxpayer money just to put on a dog and pony show to scold the Cheney Administration.

pissed off patricia's picture

I'll keep my hopes up and my expectations down.


Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.

surfjac's picture

..so far, that's all we've been able to have, expectations. The aggravation over what should be a simple debate or "teachable" moment over health insurance reform is dominating everything. There is nothing on the President's agenda until the Health Insurance Reform legislation is passed. Given the volume of this debate, there will be violence at some volcanic level if the W administration is taken to task for its crimes. Sad really! We can't have a civil discussion about our health care concerns and we can't or won't prosecute criminals. So much for our democracy today!


Mickey: "It was an epiphany. Do you know what an epipany is?"
Keoni: "NOT NOW MICKEY!"

Stupid Git's picture

Countdown: Torture Prosecutions (from 2005)

The court will be asked to finding Rumsfeld and the others responsible for treatment of the eight detainees, which a joint statement read included “torture and other cruel and degrading treatment, including severe and repeated beatings, cutting with knives, sexual humiliation and assault, mock executions, death threats, and restraint in contorted and excruciating positions.”

None of the eight detainees ever charged with a crime. A similar suit was filed last year in Germany against Rumsfeld and other officials, including the ex-director of Central Intelligence George Tenet, claiming they bore responsibility for the human rights violations at Baghdad‘s Abu Ghraib prison.

Last month, German officials said they would take no action against Rumsfeld in that case.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7066885/

Let's play kick the can...

Seriously, how many times has Countdown done a "Torture Prosecutions" segment in the past four years?

Tax the Rich's picture

So many many crimes. Such little time. Where does one begin?


Rush Limbaugh is what a smart person thinks a stupid bigot sounds like.

liberalNmoderation's picture

Go for bush and cheney first I say.
Go after, and don't stop until they're at the Hague on trial for war crimes.

..fifty years! The point beyond punishing politicians who acted contrary to our laws would hopefully be to dissuade some future politician from persuing the same criminal activity. And it still galls me that these so-called Patriots have acted in such manner all the while receiving support from other so-called Patriots who refuse to see the laws of the land they love be enforced. Shameful!


Mickey: "It was an epiphany. Do you know what an epipany is?"
Keoni: "NOT NOW MICKEY!"

Stupid Git's picture

If a lawyer can't get these guys locked up for perjury at the very least, they don't deserve their job:

Bush:

2005: “We do not torture,” Bush declared in response to reports of secret CIA prisons overseas.

Really?

2008: "As a matter of fact," Bush added, "I told the country we did that. And I told them it was legal. We had legal opinions that enabled us to do it."
http://www.seattlepi.com/opinion/361447_thoma...

Gonzo:

During his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Gonzales described Army reservists who abused and sexually humiliated Iraqi detainees as "people who are morally bankrupt, having fun. ... Like all of you, I have been deeply troubled and offended by reports of abuse."
Gonzales, 49, said he "absolutely condemned" harsh interrogation tactics used at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-...

Really? That's not what this says:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles...

And that's in just five minutes on Google. Our Dem leadership sucks.

SadButTrue's picture

After Ashcroft, Gone-zero and Mukasey you'd think it couldn't get any worse - but it has. Eric Holder is now just as guilty as his GOP-appointed predecessors were of maintaining the principle that those in power are above the law. As Glenn Greenwald pointed out a week or two ago, this is despicable because now both parties have agreed on it it becomes entrenched in the way things are done and the way they will be done going forward.


"In theory theory and practice are alike. In practice they are very different."

surfjac's picture

..Holder, Pelosi, Obama...all of them and all of us. Until they start the investigations, they are violating our laws. We are compelled to investigate the allegations of torture and prosecute if its been found we tortured. There is no shade of gray; its clearly spelled out in the law and in the agreements we've signed. Since they've admitted to torturing, gee, how much of an investigation does it have to be?


Mickey: "It was an epiphany. Do you know what an epipany is?"
Keoni: "NOT NOW MICKEY!"

liberalNmoderation's picture

you have to be under oath...but I could be mistook.

pissed off patricia's picture

If you aren't under oath you are just a run of the mill regular lying son of a bitch. I think that's the way it goes.


Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.

liberalNmoderation's picture

sums it up nicely PoP.

FloydGeorge104's picture

When the 911 wanted bush to come in what did they do. Sure,I wand "DICK by my side, no tapes, no vidio and WE will not be under oath. makes me sick how these fucktards have F-up our country and now collect a retirement, for life.

Stupid Git's picture

You're right that Bush wasn't - but Gonzo was under oath.

pissed off patricia's picture

Just throw us some red meat so we know that someone, anyone is serious about this.


Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

Diabolus est Deus Inversus

The Science Pundit's picture

David Iglesias for special prosecutor. ;-)

Niques's picture
LOL

I second that nomination!

That Mick Piobr's picture

of whitewash is holding up well.

Change that you can pretend in. (And I voted for him)

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

We'll just get more of this kind of people:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/1xtra/tx/weekinpictures/...

No one higher up.


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

Stupid Git's picture

It's a shame those few bad apples spoiled the honorable President Bush's image as a moral and just leader.

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

Diabolus est Deus Inversus

Pete Seattle's picture

Start with Bush and Cheney, how hard is that?

Liberal AND Proud's picture

A fish rots from the head back.


"Anyone that makes less than $150K in this country, has no business voting Republican."

Samson-'s picture

something about the eric holder-DOJ angle in investigating those that went beyond the bounds of what yoo and the other thuggies said was acceptable seems to be almost worse than doing nothing in regards to bringing our domestic terrorists to justice.

it tacitly supports the bush admin's views on what is and what is not torture.

Terrible's picture

but is itself a criminal act. if Holder doesn't prosecute all the way to the top to the full extent of our laws then Holder needs to go to prison. period. IT'S THE LAW!

Handypants's picture

An investigation, a few strongly worded letters and (sadly) no prosecutions.


"I know that there are people who do not love their fellow
man, and I hate people like that!
" ~ Tom Lehrer (1928 - )

... does that mean I can carry a pound of marijuana in the trunk?


Corruption favors the wealthy.

pissed off patricia's picture

If you did it yesterday it's probably okay. I wouldn't try it today though.


Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.

Samson-'s picture

and please stop by mi casa for a spell

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

Diabolus est Deus Inversus

surfjac's picture

..


Mickey: "It was an epiphany. Do you know what an epipany is?"
Keoni: "NOT NOW MICKEY!"

mrspeel's picture

...the good old "unnamed sources" rhetoric gets published as fact! When so-called journalists use this tactic and actually get treated as though it's the weeks biggest story - even when it's not true - I suspect they will just continue to make things up.

I don't believe anything anymore about what the government is supposedly doing unless it comes from a "named source"!

SadButTrue's picture

"Should any American soldier be so base and infamous as to injure any [prisoner]. . . I do most earnestly enjoin you to bring him to such severe and exemplary punishment as the enormity of the crime may require. Should it extend to death itself, it will not be disproportional to its guilt at such a time and in such a cause… for by such conduct they bring shame, disgrace and ruin to themselves and their country."

-- George Washington, charge to the Northern Expeditionary Force,
Sept. 14, 1775


"In theory theory and practice are alike. In practice they are very different."

project's picture

surfjac
..fifty years! The point beyond punishing politicians who acted contrary to our laws would hopefully be to dissuade some future politician from persuing the same criminal activity. And it still galls me that these so-called Patriots have acted in such manner all the while receiving support from other so-called Patriots who refuse to see the laws of the land they love be enforced. Shameful!

I agree with that 100%.
But I wonder if Holder is so reluctant because they are all crooks and if they start with the biggest fish it won't be long before they we are going after the small fry also?
Look they all take bribes and we know that has been going on longer then I have been alive. But I think bribery has become the standard operating proceedure in our government today. As a matter of fact I think that 99% of all the people in the current congress and senate are only there for the money they can steal! Of corse the republicans are so greedy and narrow minded that they don't care about anything other then greed!
But republicanism is a mental illness!

No longer from Japan Tim's picture

I believe in heaven and hell and by my beliefs, I'll be able to meet a lot of you good people in heaven (as long as I keep my poop in a group) and none of us will have to deal with or see any of these asshat criminals.

Shit, THAT, in and of itself, is pretty close to heavenly!

Comments are closed on this entry