Bill Moyers Journal: Glenn Greenwald and Amy Goodman Win Independent Media Award
By Heather Sunday Apr 05, 2009 9:00am
You Tube
From Bill Moyers Journal:
Amy Goodman and Glenn Greenwald are the first recipients of the Park Center for Independent Media Izzy Award (named for I.F. Stone) — named "Pillars of independent media, chosen for the award, because of their journalistic courage and persistence in confronting conventional wisdom and official deception."
"I think the way the media works is they show the spectrum of opinion between the Democrats and the Republicans in Washington. Often that is very narrow. But the fact is, the majority of Americans fall outside of that opinion." -Amy Goodman
"It's not even some sort of Machiavellian or conspiratorial effort, sometimes, to exclude certain opinions. It's actually the fact that reporters — and media stars — and corporate and establishment journalists are so embedded into the establishment...That they're so completely insular and out of touch from what public opinion actually is. And polls show that huge numbers of issues and positions that are held by large numbers of Americans are ones that are virtually never heard in our media discussions." - Glenn Greenwald
Transcript below the fold.
BILL MOYERS: Glenn, you were too young to know Izzy Stone, but do you feel, as he said about himself, lonely and marginalized for being independent?
GLENN GREENWALD: Yes and no. In one sense, it's clearly the case that if you are a critic of political power and the media establishment that there are going to be lots of opportunities that you end up not being able to take advantage of. There are going to be lots of invitations that ordinarily you might receive that you end up not getting. Lots of people who shun you. Particularly the targets of your critique. I think that's quite natural. And so, in that sense, I think if you tip, if you purposely remain on the outside of establishment power, in order to critique it, there are going to be lots of episodes that produce a form of loneliness. Which I think is actually quite gratifying and rewarding, and a hallmark of the fact that you're doing the right thing.
But I think one thing that has changed is that there are now lots of other mechanisms, certainly as compared as to when he was writing, that enable like-minded people who are dissatisfied and angry with the establishment to find one another. And to realize that they're not nearly as rare, in terms of what it is that they think, as perhaps even 10, 15 years ago, when there was a monopoly on political discourse.
AMY GOODMAN: You're not alone when you think about the awesome responsibility we have as journalists. With a microphone going to where the silence is. Going to where most people would want to go to ask questions and they can't. So, all of those people are there. And then standing on the shoulders of people like Izzy Stone, I.F. Stone, and all those who feel it's so critical that we have a sacred mission as journalists. There's a reason why our profession, journalism, is the only one explicitly protected by the U.S. Constitution. Because we're supposed to be the check and balance on power. That's our job.
GLENN GREENWALD: Well, what I think is interesting is to look at what journalists, establishment journalists, who work in the largest corporations in the country, in the media division, say about what their role is. In order to understand how the reporting on Iraq was done. How it's done on the financial crisis. Last month Howard Fineman, the "Newsweek" reporter, and MSNBC contributor, wrote an article in which a column, in which he said that the establishment is now worried that Barack Obama is not up to the job. And he made clear that he was speaking on behalf of the establishment, as a member of it. And he said that the establishment, to the extent it exists in America, is now comprised of three stools. The financiers on Wall Street, political elites in Washington, and media stars in the New York/Washington corridor. And there's a "Newsweek" cover story by Evan Thomas, who's a long time Washington insider reporter. And it's concerning Paul Krugman's status as a critic of Obama from the Left. And in this article Evan Thomas, I thought quite revealingly declared himself, as well, like Howard Fineman did, to be a member of the establishment persuasion, as he called it. And what he said was that, by definition, members of the establishment are devoted to preserving the existing order. The prevailing status quo. Keeping things the way they are.
BILL MOYERS: Yeah, actually.
GLENN GREENWALD: Defending institutional prerogatives.
BILL MOYERS: I actually brought his quote. "Protecting traditional institutions, can be healthy and useful, stabilizing, and reassuring." I admire his honesty, but I can't imagine either of you saying anything like that.
GLENN GREENWALD: If you only speak to a very narrow slice of people. If you spend most of your time in Washington only speaking to political elites in both parties, or corporate executives and lobbyists, you have a very distorted picture of what public opinion is. I mean, a lot of times both political parties will agree on a certain position that a huge number of Americans, often even majorities actually reject. And yet, if all you're doing is talking to people in political power and political and financial elite, you will believe that the range of opinion is much narrower than it actually is. And so, it's not even some sort of Machiavellian or conspiratorial effort, sometimes, to exclude certain opinions. It's actually the fact that reporters and media stars and corporate and establishment journalists are so embedded into the establishment as a cultural and sociological matter. That they're so completely insular and out of touch from what public opinion actually is. And polls show that huge numbers of issues and positions that are held by large numbers of Americans are ones that are virtually never heard in our media discussions.
AMY GOODMAN: I think the way the media works is they show the spectrum of opinion between the Democrats and the Republicans in Washington. Often that is very narrow. You look at the lead up to the invasion in Iraq, the core, the major Democrats joined with the Republicans in enabling that. And you look at now with health care, the same thing. But the fact is, the majority of Americans fall outside of that opinion. And it's our role in the media not just to bring you that spectrum, but to, well, provide — I see the media as a huge kitchen table that we all sit around and debate and discuss these critical issues. To open up. That's what the American people want. And it's our responsibility to do it.
BILL MOYERS: When Tim Russert died, the long time and very popular moderator of "Meet the Press," and a friend of mine, by the way. The political and media elites in Washington turned out for him in mass. Do you realize that's not going to happen to you when your time comes?
GLENN GREENWALD: Yeah, but, you know, I'm actually, I consider that to be a good thing. I mean, I found it almost oxymoronic. That Tim Russert was constantly held up as the symbol of what an adversarial journalist would be. That he was supposedly this great thorn in the side of power. And yet, his celebrity was so great that when he died it was almost treated as though it was a death of Princess Diana, and everyone rushed forward in order to from the highest political elites to media stars to treat him as what he, in fact, was. Which was a celebrity. And if you look at what Tim Russert actually did there were a couple of actually interesting episodes where not his image, but the reality of what he did was unmasked, during the Lewis Libby trial, in particular. The trial of Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff for obstruction of justice. That involved a lot of journalists, because they were participants in the effort to unmask Valerie Plame Wilson and to smear Joe Wilson. And what he said during that trial, under oath, was they asked him, well, when you have a conversation with one of your sources, with the government official, when is it that you decide that it's confidential. And when is it that you can report it? And what he said was, well, actually, when I have a conversation with the government official, I consider that conversation presumptively confidential. And I will disclose it only if they authorize me to do so. And it was it was an extraordinary revelation, because if you talk to government officials, and you only disclose to the public things that you know, when they allow you or give you permission to do so, what you're really describing is the role of a propagandist, not of a journalist. And yet, that was what you know, Tim Russert in many ways was. That's what his celebrity was based in.
BILL MOYERS: In fact, Dick Cheney's P.R. fellow said that "Meet the Press" was the ideal format for Cheney to control the message. What does that tell you about government and the media inside Washington?
AMY GOODMAN: That media is broken right now. And I think the embedding process has brought the media to an all time low. You have reporters embedded in the front lines of troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. What about being embedded in Iraqi hospitals and Afghan communities? In the peace movement around the world? And not only the problem of embedding in troops. But the problem is being embedded in the establishment.
We occupy an uncomfortable position. We're supposed to be outside. It's not one that gets a lot of perks, it's one that makes journalism so important to the functioning of a democratic society. Now, I'll tell you, especially around issues around war. And we see just the failing, once again, in the press, not bringing up questions about the expansion of war in Afghanistan. And the same way that questions weren't asked in the lead up to the invasion of Iraq.
You can watch the full interview here.






Login or Register to post comments.
along with Sy Hersh
I can't credit them enough.
I am subscribed to them both.
Yes! The first Izzy award.
I read Goodman's book "Static" where she deconstructs what we are subjected to in the media and its very insightful. I listen to Goodman daily and probably have not missed a podcast of her show in years. I also have a ton of respect for Greenwald's acutely informed opinion on matters legal, and otherwise.
It's great to see three of my media heros together in one room. Fantastic!
I loved watching these three, I've been following them all for years.
Glenn, you needed to take a breath!
Glenn, whose writings I really love, very nearly dominated this entire interview. I really would like to have seen the three of them interacting more instead of Glenn holding forth so long. I wanted more of Amy!
To think that so reasonable and reasoned discussion as this is almost unique in our culture.
I want to weep for our loss.
and I loved the respect they showed over and over for each other... no interrupting another; no talking over someone else; no lunatic ravings from the interviewer... just respectful and insightful repartee. Amazing! I'd forgotten how wonderful it is.
Now imagine the difference between Tim Russert and an actual journalist like Amy Goodman. Even Kieth Olbermann would not have been so treated or would he have been there for the story, and Kieth is among the best.
You can have Amy Goodman "arrested" at your joke of a convention but you will never, ever succeed in supressing the truth. To paraphrase Dr. King, truth pressed to the earth shall rise again.
Maintaining your self serving fraud of a status quo is a huge disservice to America and especially to future generations, who will inherit what we build, for better or worse. Get off your self serving ass like Glenn and Amy have and help those with conscience and character rebuild what self centered toadies like you have torn down.
Thank you John for posting this and I thank Glenn, Amy and Bill Moyers for helping to speak truth to power.
of our country. We need more people to hear them ,and we need more outlets like Bill Moyers Journal and Democracy Now! so that Americans won't be misled.
This show was outstanding. It showed how important showing BOTH sides is vital to the survival of this country. Amy said it so well in this piece, and we should all read-or-watch it again. We should be listening to the voices that are NOT inside the convention center. We should be listening to the voices of those who experience the financial impact--the homeless, the foreclosed on, the jobless.
I listened to George Will this morning and thought of these two when he spouted the 'Libertarian' talking points. He never talked to a homeless person, or a protester. He doesn't want to know the OTHER side of the story.
How many times does a Republican mention a PERSON? It's always Banks, tax cuts and small business....not people.
Public opinion is what the big shots tell us it is. Got it?
I hope and pray that journalim students world-wide aspire fully, and completely, to the standards of these three. I was not even aware of who Izzy Stone was until last week......I asked myself, how was that possible???
The line mentioned about how lonely Izzy Stone's life could be, answered that question. People in journalism, that posess true integrity and are masters of their craft, are excluded from the club.........lucky for us, and just as well for them.
I'm sure Izzy, and the likes of these three, would prefer to excluded from the club rather than sell their souls to get an invitation to a shitty D.C. cocktail partay!!!
Long live integrity, and people like Bill, Amy, Glenn, etc.
Glenn and Amy have been great at exposing the Neocon, AIPAC, War for Israel agenda to the extent that they can discuss such a taboo topic...
But if you *really* want to know the dirty business that's been going on check out philipweiss.org
Read Phil's articles on Neocons, AIPAC and Zionism:
Ferment Over the Israel Lobby - The Nation
Shiksa countries are for practice
Listen to Phil discuss the Neocons War for Israel agenda:
Antiwar.com/Radio - 2008/07/12
Antiwar.com/Radio - 2009/03/18
Prior to the Iraq and Afghan wars, 'authentic journalist' Dan Forbes was documenting how the US government was manipulating both news media and popular entertainment with regards to implanting anti-drugs propaganda to influence the electorate. Since nothing was done about it, that emboldened the government to expand the practice using military PSYOPS personnel within news media corporations during the run-up to the Iraq War.
All the warnings were there that the government was totally suborning and castrating the media, courtesy of Forbe's articles. But because he was writing primarily about drugs, nobody seemed to make the connection. Had it been made, those government efforts might have been exposed, and the War might have been averted out of sheer public disgust. But we'll never know.
It was good to hear Tim Russert called out for what he was.
I think that when the mid-term elections come up next year or the general election in 4 years that the country should be able to vote up or down,on the blowhards on airways,cable & TV (both sides) whom report on what they think that the news is,instead of reporting what the stories of the day actually are!
In otherwords, vote the "Look at me!" blonde airheads,ex failed weathermen and women,ex-politicans who have either been run out of office,or resigned before their term was up...!
This would be a great step to solve the huge problems facing the country today!
Of course it will never happen!
the Empire's approved methods, and toward the same end. Maximum profitability for a corporate based state.
Good interview. Thanks for posting Heather.
(PS Glenn, if you visit here, I always go over to Salon to read your articles, even though I'm not a member,)
DN is one of my favorite programs and Glenn's blog is essential reading. Many thanks to their wonderful efforts and I wish that more journalists would emulate their integrity and passion.
Leading by example is powerful. Traditional media hacks that coast on the contrived construct of Objective Journalism by parroting -- unchallenged and unverified -- bald faced lies for fear of being labeled partisan have enabled the biggest mugging of our constitution, our economy, our political system and our country's integrity in its history. Truth is not found in objectivity. Sometimes truth comes from doing your homework before an interview and calling a person of power on their hypocritical B.S.
Jon Stewart -- who produces humor from raw truth-telling -- is a modern incarnation of Hunter Thompson who pretty much nailed it with this:
"So much for Objective Journalism. Don't bother to look for it here — not under any byline of mine; or anyone else I can think of. With the possible exception of things like box scores, race results, and stock market tabulations, there is no such thing as Objective Journalism. The phrase itself is a pompous contradiction in terms.
"Some people will say that words like scum and rotten are wrong for Objective Journalism — which is true, but they miss the point. It was the built-in blind spots of the Objective rules and dogma that allowed Nixon to slither into the White House in the first place. He looked so good on paper that you could almost vote for him sight unseen. He seemed so all-American, so much like Horatio Alger, that he was able to slip through the cracks of Objective Journalism. You had to get Subjective to see Nixon clearly, and the shock of recognition was often painful."
Congratulations to Goodman and Greenwald. It will take some time -- maybe a long time; generations -- before our nation realizes how grateful it should be for the hard work and good journalism being done by these patriots. Thank you.
Amy Goodman lays the heavy shit on the people sans ego. That's one of the reasons she's one of my heros (and I'm not even a journalist) and why I'm happy she won another award.
Login or Register to post comments.