Go Home

Archives for May, 2010

Nights At The Roundtable - The Blue Van - 2009

The Blue Van - 3_6ad87.jpg
(The Blue Van - a little indie/soul/rock/retro from Denmark)

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: 350
WMV
PLAYS: 18
Embed

Heading up north tonight with The Blue Van from Copenhagen Denmark. They list their influences on their Myspace page as Decca, Immediate, Stax and Blue Horizon - and anybody who is remotely into that period of music (1966-1969) will instantly know what they're talking about, and there is a little bit of Small Faces in their stuff, particularly this track, There Goes My Love which I think is off their newly released album Man Up which is available from iTunes as a download.

At any rate, they've got some good tracks, well produced and if this cut appeals, they have a lot more where that came from.



Open Thread

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Rick K. and the Allnighters! Actually, I really posted this video because of the drummer, Steve Moore. I want to jam with that guy!

Open thread below...



C&L's Late Night Music Club With The Animals

Title: Sky Pilot

Happy Memorial Day! Ya'll be safe out there.



When I wrote that the Texas schoolbook rewrites were important becuase they could happen in other states, I didn't really expect to see the early adopters be the United Kingdom. Yet, the Guardian reports:

Niall Ferguson, the British historian most closely associated with a rightwing, Eurocentric vision of western ascendancy, is to work with the Conservatives to overhaul history in schools.

Speaking at the Guardian Hay festival, the Harvard-based academic, whose historiography is often considered to be an apology for imperialism, laid out his ideas for a vision of the school history curriculum in which, he said, children should be taught that the "big story" of the last 500 years "is the rise of western domination of the world".

In Ferguson's 2004 book "Empire: the rise and demise of the British world order and the lessons" he wrote this:

Between the early 1600s and the 1950s, more than 20 million people left the British Isles to begin new lives across the seas. Only a minority ever returned...To us, their decision to gamble everything on a one-way ticket seems baffling. Yet without millions of such tickets -- some purchased voluntarily, some not -- there could have been no British empire. For the indispensable foundation of the Empire was mass migration: the biggest in human history. This Britannic exodus changed the world. It turned whole continents white." (p. 44-45)

What a remarkable statement. No mention of the reasons for the mass diaspora; at least, not in this introductory paragraph. Just this: It turned whole continents white. The implications of that conclusion are mind-boggling.

This is the man who will be forming the curriculum for British schoolchildren, and here are his plans:

Along with a Channel 4 television series, he plans to produce materials for use in schools: "a four-year history syllabus on the west and the world".

The big question the course would attempt to answer, he said, was how in AD 1500 "the small warring kingdoms of Europe, which looked so feeble compared with the Ming or Ottoman empires, got to be so powerful". He said the syllabus was "bound to be Eurocentric" because the world was Eurocentric.

Answering criticisms from the audience that the project sounded uninterested in the fates of the oppressed, Ferguson lashed out against "the militant tendency" in the audience and said: "Can we get away from this rightwing-historian, apologist-for-empire crap?"

Oh, silly us, caring about the oppressed and those continents that weren't turned white, that aren't white, that aren't Eurocentric. Pity those who don't bow down to the great White Legend in deference.

Wanna bet Rupert Murdoch has a stake in it?



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (465)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (613)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Boy this guy's batting 1000 isn't he?

BP CEO: We Have Got To Stop This Spill -- I Want My Life Back!:

Tony Hayward announced over the weekend that while he's "sorry for the massive disruption" the oil spill has caused, "there's no one who wants this thing over more than I do."

"Y'know, I'd like my life back," he said. "So there's no one who wants this thing done more than I do, and we are doing everything we can to contain the oil offshore, defend the shoreline and return people's lives to normal as fast as we can."

Tell that to the people who's lives you've destroyed Mr. Hayward. He told the CNN reporter in the same press conference that they're doing a good job of containing the oil offshore. So let's see, first he said that the oil spill impact was "very modest". Then he admits that it is an environmental catastrophe.

But he's also saying that the sickened cleanup workers probably have food poisoning. Heaven forbid it's the toxins in the oil and dispersants that are making them sick. And he's denying that the giant underwater oil plumes exist.

We may need BP's engineers and experts to help get the oil well plugged but Hayward and their attorneys are doing nothing but damage control. Personally I'd rather be seeing this guy take a perp walk than doing any more television interviews.



Rashomon On The Mediterranean - May 31, 2010

toshiro_mifune_in_rashomon_2_f33ba.jpg
(Rashomon - how many ways to interpret an event? Can we count them?)

With the events in the Middle East of the last 24 hours, and reading the comments posted about it, it seems there are as many ways to interpret an event as incidents taking place in the event itself. I was reminded by one writer to my colleague David Neiwert's post that "as many as sixteen" and "at least sixteen" held wildly different connotations. And were these observations based on the fog of events, the political beliefs of the players, or the simple choice of words? And how these observations translate into reactions on the parts of the viewers and listeners.

So I thought I would take a quick roundup of the English speaking broadcast media throughout the world and get a sampling of how the event was interpreted. Certainly isn't scientific. Some of the reported is decidedly slanted (i.e. the Israel National Radio segment is an extreme example), but you get an idea of just how many views can be had when an international incident takes place.

BBC+World+Service_2fff6.JPG

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: 422
WMV
PLAYS: 11
Embed

Let's start with the BBC World Service Newshour, probably one of the most widely listened to broadcasts throughout the world and how they saw it.

561828_79645.jpg

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: 371
WMV
PLAYS: 7
Embed

RTE, the national radio network of Ireland offers their interpretation of events, which coincide with a member of the Irish government taking part in the flotilla and how the Irish view this event.

logo112x38-cbcradio1_722aa.jpg

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: 370
WMV
PLAYS: 5
Embed

CBC's Hourly newscast from 12 noon (EDT) today. Israeli Prime Minister Natanyahu was visiting Canada before his arrival in the U.S. later this week, which was cut short because of the event.

bp_rn_e4417.jpg

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: 391
WMV
PLAYS: 3
Embed

ABC Radio National's PM newscast gives their view on the event.

islogo_afd18.jpg

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: 381
WMV
PLAYS: 6
Embed

Closer to the source, Kol Israel, considered the more moderate of Israeli news outlets gives a matter-of-fact description of events in their 10:30 am newscast

rsslogo_c68f6.jpg

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: 388
WMV
PLAYS: 5
Embed

And finally, Israel National Radio considered (even by them) to be the most right wing and extreme of radio outlets in the world, offers their views on the event with a 45 minute wrapup.

Somewhere in all of this is probably where the truth of the event lies. The Turkish media, broadcasting the event live and non-stop since it broke does not have English broadcasts available. Needless to say, the event will continue to unfold over the next several hours and days and no doubt the opinions and observations will grow and galvanize as well.

One event seen six different ways.



marshall_cf640.jpg

We have so many things to worry about right now, I figure we can stand a little good news, right? Whenever I read a story like this column by Rick Reilly, it makes me feel a lot less hopeless about humanity:

We live in a world where Peyton Manning walks off the Super Bowl field without shaking anybody's hand. Where Tiger Woods leaves the Masters without a word of thanks to the fans or congratulations to the winner. Where NFL lineman Albert Haynesworth kicks a man's helmetless head without a thought.

So if you think sportsmanship is toast, this next story is an all-you-can-eat buffet to a starving man.

It happened at a junior varsity girls' softball game in Indianapolis this spring. After an inning and a half, Roncalli was womanhandling inner-city Marshall Community. Marshall pitchers had already walked nine Roncalli batters. The game could've been 50-0 with no problem.

Yes, a team that hadn't lost a game in 2½ years, a team that was going to win in a landslide purposely offered to declare defeat. Why? Because Roncalli wanted to spend the two hours teaching the Marshall girls how to get better, not how to get humiliated.

It's no wonder. This was the first softball game in Marshall history. A middle school trying to move up to include grades 6 through 12, Marshall showed up to the game with five balls, two bats, no helmets, no sliding pads, no cleats, 16 players who'd never played before, and a coach who'd never even seen a game.

One Marshall player asked, "Which one is first base?" Another: "How do I hold this bat?" They didn't know where to stand in the batter's box. Their coaches had to be shown where the first- and third-base coaching boxes were.

That's when Roncalli did something crazy. It offered to forfeit.

Yes, a team that hadn't lost a game in 2½ years, a team that was going to win in a landslide purposely offered to declare defeat. Why? Because Roncalli wanted to spend the two hours teaching the Marshall girls how to get better, not how to get humiliated.

"The Marshall players did NOT want to quit," wrote Roncalli JV coach Jeff Traylor, in recalling the incident. "They were willing to lose 100 to 0 if it meant they finished their first game." But the Marshall players finally decided if Roncalli was willing to forfeit for them, they should do it for themselves. They decided that maybe -- this one time -- losing was actually winning.

That's about when the weirdest scene broke out all over the field: Roncalli kids teaching Marshall kids the right batting stance, throwing them soft-toss in the outfield, teaching them how to play catch. They showed them how to put on catching gear, how to pitch, and how to run the bases. Even the umps stuck around to watch.

Continue reading »



One of the most tragic consequences of the subprime mortgage crisis has been the toll minorities have paid. Republicans point to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and ACORN as the mortgage Satans of the 21st century, but the truth is something else entirely.

Here's one example:

For two decades, Tyrone Banks was one of many African-Americans who saw his economic prospects brightening in this Mississippi River city.

A single father, he worked for FedEx and also as a custodian, built a handsome brick home, had a retirement account and put his eldest daughter through college.

Then the Great Recession rolled in like a fog bank. He refinanced his mortgage at a rate that adjusted sharply upward, and afterward he lost one of his jobs. Now Mr. Banks faces bankruptcy and foreclosure.

“I’m going to tell you the deal, plain-spoken: I’m a black man from the projects and I clean toilets and mop up for a living,” said Mr. Banks, a trim man who looks at least a decade younger than his 50 years. “I’m proud of what I’ve accomplished. But my whole life is backfiring.”

Like so many, Mr. Banks was lured by the promises made by the big banks like Wells Fargo and others: Refinance your home, take out some money for yourself, and hey, the interest rate will be low...for awhile, anyway.

The squeeze came for him when the interest rates on that variable rate mortgage rose and his income dropped. While it's not limited to minority borrowers, the impact on minority communities has been deeper than on white communities, largely because the unemployment rate is much higher.

Black middle-class neighborhoods are hollowed out, with prices plummeting and homes standing vacant in places like Orange Mound, White Haven and Cordova. As job losses mount — black unemployment here, mirroring national trends, has risen to 16.9 percent from 9 percent two years ago; it stands at 5.3 percent for whites — many blacks speak of draining savings and retirement accounts in an effort to hold onto their homes. The overall local foreclosure rate is roughly twice the national average.

It appears that the higher foreclosure rate is no accident. In fact, it seems that Wells Fargo targeted minorities to market higher-risk loans. At least, that's the accusation causing federal authorities to take a closer look at their lending practices there.

Camille Thomas, a 40-year-old African-American, loved working for Wells Fargo. “I felt like I could help people,” she recalled over coffee.

As the subprime market heated up, she said, the bank pressure to move more loans — for autos, for furniture, for houses — edged into mania. “It was all about selling your units and getting your bonus,” she said.

What follows next is a story told across the country, but when the scam is played on a community just beginning to get a toehold on forward economic progress, the setback is one that may take more than a generation to overcome.

She described tricks of the trade, several of dubious legality. She said supervisors had told employees to white out incomes on loan applications and substitute higher numbers. Agents went “fishing” for customers, mailing live checks to leads. When a homeowner deposited the check, it became a high-interest loan, with a rate of 20 to 29 percent. Then bank agents tried to talk the customer into refinancing, using the house as collateral.

Ask a conservative and they'll tell you those people shouldn't have believed they'd get something for nothing. Well, I beg to differ. In the subprime heyday, phone calls rolled in here at record pace, promising us we could refinance our home and pull out enough cash to retire. When our middle son graduated from high school we were inundated with offers to refinance to send him to college. We had already been stung during the S&L crisis, so we knew it was a scam. But to the uninitiated, it seemed like a step up.

But then, look what happens:

Two years ago, his doorbell rang, and two men from Wells Fargo offered to consolidate his consumer loans into a low-cost mortgage.

“I thought, ‘This is great! ’ ” Mr. Banks says. “When you have four kids, college expenses, you look for any savings.”

What those men did not tell Mr. Banks, he says (and Ms. Thomas, who studied his case, confirms), is that his new mortgage had an adjustable rate. When it reset last year, his payment jumped to $1,700 from $1,200.

We've heard all of these stories before, but in Memphis the result is deep, dire and depressing.

“We’re wiping out whatever wealth blacks have accumulated — it assures racial economic inequality for the next generation,” said Thomas M. Shapiro, director of the Institute on Assets and Social Policy at Brandeis University.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (698)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (939)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Comparing the Gulf oil spill to Katrina doesn't explain the amount of damage being done to Barack Obama's presidency if you believe a new meme that is circulating in the media.

President Bush was already in his second term when his government responded so poorly to Katrina hitting the Gulf coast. The poor response could hardly be blamed for destroying an already crippled president in his second term.

Conservatives have now picked up the talking point that the oil spill is equivalent to the Iranian hostage crisis that is credited with destroying President Jimmy Carter's presidency.

George Will advanced the idea Sunday.

"I think the danger isn't that this is his Katrina. It's that it's his Iranian hostage crisis," Will told ABC's Jake Tapper.

"That happened to Carter in his first and it turned out only term. So it wasn't like Katrina which was sort of beside the point, Bush was a spent force by then anyway and it reinforced the perception, people said Carter is well meaning, they like him, intelligent fellow but maybe he isn't up to the job and the jury is still out on that for Barack Obama," said Will.

Another conservative voice, Chris Wallace, also echoed the talking point.

"I spoke with a top Democratic strategist this week who said he really thinks it's more Obama's Iranian hostage crisis in the fact it's dragging out over time and there is a question if he should be fairly blamed for it, but the public is going to become increasingly frustrated and they will blame the president for somehow not fixing it," Wallace said on Fox News Sunday.

But the meme may have been started by a pundit that is often friendly to the president. Following Obama's Thursday news conference, Chris Matthews criticized the Commander in Chief for not seizing control of the disaster.

"I think this is more like the Iranian hostage crisis that brought down Jimmy Carter than Katrina," he said.

The following day a Reuters blogger furthered the thought.

"Then the problem isn’t Obama’s Katrina, it is his Iranian hostage crisis — a long-term problem he has no control over that continually drains his political capital and popularity," wrote James Pethokoukis.



Dems Refuse to Face War Realities

Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) shows the kind of spirit and initiative required to drum some sense into the debate about how long President Obama intends to keep our troops in Afghanistan.

Unfortunately, there aren't many Democratic politicians willing to stand with him in an election year. Listen to what he says - he's not anti-war, he understands the need for a military and that there is a time and place to use military force. But spending our soldiers' blood and our nation's treasure against unclear objectives and without clear progress toward achievable objectives just isn't wise.

As the war in Afghanistan surpasses the Vietnam war in length and cost, maybe the Dems will find their courage after the mid-terms.